Is the rabbit a natural model of fetal growth restriction? Morphological and functional characterization study using diffusion-weighted MRI and stereology.

INTRODUCTION: Rabbits are routinely used as a natural model of fetal growth restriction (FGR); however, no studies have confirmed that rabbits have FGR. This study aimed to characterize the fetoplacental unit (FPU) in healthy pregnant rabbits using diffusion-weighted MRI and stereology. A secondary objective of the study was to describe the associations among findings from diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), fetal weight measurement and histological analysis of the placenta. METHODS: Pregnant rabbits underwent DW-MRI under general anesthesia on embryonic day 28 of pregnancy. MR imaging was performed at 3.0 T. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated for the fetal brain, liver, and placenta. The placenta was analyzed by stereology (volume density of trophoblasts, the maternal blood space and fetal vessels). Each fetus and placenta were weighed. Two groups of fetuses were defined according to the position in the uterine horn (Cervix group versus Ovary group). RESULTS: We analyzed 20 FPUs from 5 pregnant rabbits. Fetuses and placentas were significantly lighter in the Cervix group than in the Ovary group (34.7 ± 3.7 g vs. 40.2 ± 5.4 g; p = 0.02). Volume density analysis revealed that the percentage of fetal vessels, the maternal blood space and trophoblasts was not significantly affected by the position of the fetus in the uterine horn. There was no difference in ADC values according to the position of the fetus in the uterine horn, and there was no correlation between ADC values and fetal weight. DISCUSSION: The findings of a multimodal evaluation of the placenta in a rabbit model of FGR suggested is not a natural model of fetal growth restriction.

Universal screening of postpartum depression with Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of universal screening of postpartum depression (PPD), using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) in the general population. To investigate the proportion of women identified as being at risk of PPD and with confirmed PPD or other mental disorders after a psychiatric consultation. METHODS: A multicenter prospective cohort study in four French maternities conducted between 2020 and 2023. All women aged over 18 years, who delivered following a singleton pregnancy after 37 weeks of gestation were eligible for inclusion. The exclusion criteria were pre-existing psychiatric disorders such as depressive syndrome. The EPDS was completed at 8 weeks postpartum via an online self-administered questionnaire. If the response to the questionnaire suggested a mental disorder, a psychiatric consultation was proposed to the women concerned. The endpoints were the proportion of women completing the EPDS, the EPDS score, the proportion of women at risk of PPD, the proportion of psychiatric consultation, and the subsequent diagnosis. RESULTS: The study included 923 women, of whom 55.0% (508/923) completed the EPDS. Among them, 28.1% (143/508) had an EPDS score of 10 or more, and 11.2% (57/508) received a psychiatric consultation. PPD was confirmed in 8.8% (5/57) of women. Other disorders detected were mood disorders, disorders specifically associated with stress, and anxiety/fear-related disorders, in 33.3%, 28.1%, and 14.0% of the women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Screening with self-administered EPDS is feasible, with a good response rate, making it possible to suspect mental disorders, including PPD, and to offer psychological support when needed.

Opportunities for, and barriers to, uterus-preserving surgical techniques for placenta accreta spectrum.

INTRODUCTION: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) can lead to major peripartum morbidity. Appropriate management approaches depend on the clinical severity, each individual's preference, and the treating team's expertise. Peripartum hysterectomy is the most frequently used treatment option. However, it can impact psychological well-being and fertility. We investigated whether conservative treatment with focal resection or leaving the placenta in situ is associated with comparable or lower maternal morbidity than hysterectomy in centers of excellence within the International Society for placenta accreta spectrum (IS-PAS). Furthermore, a survey was conducted to explore potential barriers to conservative management in antenatal counseling and intraoperative decision-making. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Confirmed PAS cases in the prospective IS-PAS database from 22 registered centers between January 2020 and June 2022 were included in the analysis. A separate online survey with 21 questions was answered by the IS-PAS center experts about indications, diagnostic criteria, patient counseling, surgical practice, changes from the preoperative treatment plan, and why conservative management may not be offered. RESULTS: A total of 234 cases were included in the analysis: 186 women received hysterectomy and 38 women were treated by focal resection, and 10 by leaving the placenta in situ. Blood loss was lower in the focal resection group and in the placenta in situ group compared to the hysterectomy group (p = 0.04). 46.4% of the women initially planned for focal resection, and 35.7% of those initially planned for leaving the placenta in situ were ultimately treated by hysterectomy. Our survey showed that the IS-PAS centers preferred hysterectomy according to a woman's wishes (64%) and when they expected less blood loss and morbidity (41%). Eighteen percent of centers did not offer focal resection at all due to a lack of experience with this technique. Reasons for not offering to leave the placenta in situ were avoidance of unexpected reoperation (36%), puerperal infection (32%), or skepticism about the method (23%). CONCLUSIONS: Uterus-preserving treatment strategies such as focal resection appear to be safe alternatives to peripartum hysterectomy. However, less than half of the IS-PAS centers perform them. Acceptance of conservative treatments could be increased by standardized criteria for their implementation and by systematic training for PAS experts.

Analysis of the transplacental transmission of SARS CoV-2 virus and antibody transfer according to the gestational age at maternal infection.

To quantify transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus and antibody transfer in pregnant women and their newborns according to the gestational age at maternal infection. A prospective observational multicenter study including pregnant women with a positive RT-PCR or a positive serology for SARS-CoV-2 and compatible symptoms, from April to December 2020, in 11 French maternities. The study was designed to obtain a systematic collection of mother-infant dyad's samples at birth. SARS-CoV-2 viral load was measured by RT-PCR. IgG and IgM antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Antibody concentrations and transplacental transfer ratios were analyzed according to the gestational age at maternal infection. The primary outcome was the rate of SARS CoV-2 materno-fetal transmission at birth. The secondary outcome was the quantification of materno-fetal antibody transfer. Maternal and neonatal outcomes at birth were additionally assessed. Among 165 dyads enrolled, one congenital infection was confirmed {n = 1 (0.63%) IC95% [0.02%; 3.48%]}. The average placental IgG antibody transfer ratio was 1.27 (IC 95% [0.69-2.89]). The transfer ratio increased with increasing time between the onset of maternal infection and delivery (P Value = 0.0001). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were reassuring. We confirmed the very low rate of SARS-CoV-2 transplacental transmission (< 1%). Maternal antibody transfer to the fetus was more efficient when the infection occurred during the first and second trimester of pregnancy.

Impact of discontinuing oxytocin in active labour on neonatal morbidity: an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxytocin is effective in reducing labour duration but can be associated with fetal and maternal complications that could potentially be reduced by discontinuing the treatment during labour. We aimed to assess the impact of discontinuing oxytocin during active labour on neonatal morbidity. METHODS: STOPOXY was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, controlled, superiority trial conducted in 21 maternity units in France. Participants who received oxytocin before 4 cm dilation were randomly assigned 1:1 to either discontinuous oxytocin (oxytocin infusion stopped beyond a cervical dilation equal to or greater than 6 cm) or continuous oxytocin (administration of oxytocin continued until delivery). Randomisation was stratified by centre and parity. The primary outcome, neonatal morbidity, was assessed at birth using a composite variable defined by an umbilical arterial pH at birth less than 7·10, a base excess greater than 10 mmol/L, umbilical arterial lactates greater than 7 mmol/L, a 5-min Apgar score less than 7, or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Efficacy and safety was assessed in participants who were randomly assigned (excluding those who withdrew consent or were deemed ineligible after randomisation) and had reached a cervical dilation of at least 6 cm. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03991091. FINDINGS: Of 2459 participants randomly assigned between Jan 13, 2020, and Jan 24, 2022, 2170 were eligible to receive the intervention and were included in the final modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome occurred for 102 (9·6%) of 1067 participants (95% CI 7·9 to 11·5) in the discontinuous oxytocin group and for 101 (9·2%) of 1103 participants (7·6 to 11·0) in the continuous oxytocin group; absolute difference 0·4% (95% CI -2·1 to 2·9); relative risk 1·0 (95% CI 0·8 to 1·4). There were no clinically significant differences in adverse events between the two groups of the safety population. INTERPRETATION: Among participants receiving oxytocin in early labour, discontinuing oxytocin when the active phase is reached does not clinically or statistically significantly reduce neonatal morbidity compared with continuous oxytocin. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health and the Département de la Recherche Clinique et du Développement de l'Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris.

Contribution of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion (AGATA): protocol for a prospective comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Adnexal torsion is a surgical emergency and its prognosis depends on the time elapsed prior to treatment. The diagnosis relies on pelvic ultrasound in which sensitivity remains low and may lead to misdiagnosis.The primary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of adnexal torsion in women with suspected adnexal torsion. The secondary objectives are: (1) to describe the perfusion parameters of the ovaries by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, (2) to compare diagnostic performance of contrast ultrasound with bidimensional (2D) Doppler for the detection of adnexal torsion, (3) to describe the perfusion parameters of the ovarian as a function of the degree of adnexal torsion, (4) to compare perfusion parameters before and after ovarian detorsion and (5) to describe perfusion parameters of the ovarian by using MicroVascular Flow technique. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a monocentric, prospective comparative, non-randomised, open and interventional study. We hypothesise to include 30 women: 20 positive cases compared with 10 control cases. Women are informed and recruited in the emergency ward, over a period of 36 months.The primary endpoint is the signal intensity measurement to assess sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for detection of adnexal torsion in women with suspected adnexal torsion. The presence or absence of adnexal torsion is confirmed during the surgical intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the French Ethics Committee, the CPP (Comité de Protection des Personnes) OUEST I on 3 July 2020 with reference number 2020T1-16. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT04522219); EudraCT registry (2020-000993-27).

Perinatal outcomes of severe, isolated intrauterine growth restriction before 25 weeks' gestation: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perinatal outcome associated with severe and isolated intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) diagnosed before 25 weeks and to describe factors related to fetal death. METHODS: This retrospective study included singleton pregnancies with an estimated fetal weight (EFW) ≤ 3rd centile between 21 + 0 and 24 + 6 weeks' gestation referred between 2013 and 2020. All fetuses with morphological or chromosomal abnormalities were excluded. We constituted three groups based on perinatal outcomes to highlight poor prognostic factors: live birth, fetal death and termination of pregnancies (TOP). RESULTS: We included 98 pregnancies with an overall survival rate of 61.2% (60/98). There were 63.2% (62/98) live births, 24.5% (24/98) TOP, and 12.2% (12/98) fetal death. Of the live births, 27.4% (17/62) of fetuses were born before 32 weeks, and two died in the neonatal period (2/62; 3.2%). The fetal death rate was higher with the presence of an EFW below the first percentile (83.3% of fetal death Vs 33.8% of live births; p = 0.002), Doppler abnormalities (83.3% of fetal death Vs 6.4% of live births; p<0.001), and oligoamnios (41.9% of fetal death Vs 11.3% of live births; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Severe growth restriction detected before 25 weeks was associated with poor perinatal outcomes. There were more often EFW <1st percentile, abnormal Doppler and oligoamnios in cases of fetal death compared to live births.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Angiography of Physiological and Pathological Pregnancy Placentas Ex Vivo: Protocol for a Prospective Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia (PE) and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are 2 major pregnancy complications due to abnormal placental vasculogenesis. Data on whole fetoplacental vasculature are still missing; hence, these pathologies are not well understood. Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) angiography has been developed to characterize the human placental vasculature by injecting a contrast agent within the umbilical cord. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to compare the placental vascular architecture between normal and pathological pregnancies. This study's secondary objectives are to (1) compare texture features on MRI between groups (normal and pathological), (2) quantitatively compare the vascular architecture between both pathological groups (pathological IUGR, and pathological PE), (3) evaluate the quality of the histological examination in injected placentas, and (4) compare vascularization indices to histological characteristics. METHODS: This is a prospective controlled study. We expect to include 100 placentas: 40 from normal pregnancies and 60 from pathological pregnancies (30 for IUGR and 30 for PE). Ex vivo MR image acquisition will be performed shortly after delivery and with preparation by injection of a contrast agent in the umbilical cord. The vascular architecture will be quantitatively described by vascularization indices measured from ex vivo MRI angiography data. Comparisons of vascularization indices and texture features in accordance with the group and within comparable gestational age will be also performed. After MR image acquisition, placental histopathological analysis will be performed. RESULTS: The enrollment of women began in November 2019. In view of the recruitment capacity of our institution and the availability of the MRI, recruitment should be completed by March 2022. As of November 2021, we enrolled 70% of the intended study population. CONCLUSIONS: This study protocol aims to provide information about the fetal side of placental vascular architecture in normal and pathological placenta through MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04389099; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04389099. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/35051.

Improving prenatal care during lockdown: Comparing telehealth and in-person care for low-risk pregnant women in the PROTECT pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: to compare telehealth and in-person care during the COVID-19 lockdown in a population of low-risk pregnant women for prenatal care received and perinatal outcome. METHODS: This single-center study began during the first French lockdown in 2020. Women with at least one telehealth (remote) prenatal care visit were compared with those who received care only in person. Data include results from self-administered surveys and perinatal outcomes. The main outcome was the prenatal care experience, assessed by the 5-point Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ) score. Exploratory analyses sought to identify connections between perinatal outcomes and any of their levels of QPCQ score, health/eHealth literacy, stress, and social deprivation scores . RESULTS: The experimental group included 55 women and the control group 52. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups. The mean QPCQ scores did not support any difference between the mothers' experience of prenatal care in each group: 4.15±0.52 in the telehealth and 4.26±0.63 in the in-person groups. Similarly, levels of social deprivation, stress, and health and eHealth literacy did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Regardless of social deprivation or literacy level, both telehealth and in-person monitoring appeared to provide equivalent and good-quality prenatal care experiences during the pandemic, ClinicalTrial.gov registration NCT04368832 (30th April 2020).

Training in Obstetric Ultrasound Biometry: Results from a Multicenter Reproducibility Study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the intra- and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry measurements obtained by trainee (junior) and experienced sonographers (senior) in the contest of two training programs in obstetric ultrasound. METHODS: This was a prospective study on 192 women recruited ensuring an even distribution throughout gestation (18-41 weeks), at University College London Hospital (UCLH), England (87 cases), and at Maternité Regionale Universitaire de Nancy (MRUN), France (105 cases). The training took place in two training centers with experience in ultrasound training and subspecialist training in fetal medicine. Measurements for head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were obtained twice by junior and senior sonographers, blind to their own and each other's measurements. Differences between and within sonographers were expressed in millimeters and as a percentage of fetal dimensions. Reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Reproducibility was overall high with 95% confidence intervals (CI) within <6% for intraobserver and <8% for interobserver reproducibility. Intraobserver reproducibility was lower within junior than within senior sonographers' measurements for HC (95% CI: <4% versus <3%) and FL (95% CI: <6% and < 5%). Intraobserver reproducibility was similar between the two centers/training programs (AC 95% CI: <6%). Cumulative interobserver reproducibility in both centers was similar to the reproducibility within a single site (95% CI: <5%, <8%, and <7% for HC, AC, and FL, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of fetal biometry measurement was high in centers with structured training programs regardless of sonographers' experience. Reproducibility was higher in sonographers who completed the training.

Comparison of T2 Quantification Strategies in the Abdominal-Pelvic Region for Clinical Use.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition strategies appropriate for T2 quantification in the abdominal-pelvic area. The different techniques targeted in the study were chosen according to 2 main considerations: performing T2 measurement in an acceptable time for clinical use and preventing/correcting respiratory motion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acquisitions were performed at 3 T. To select sequences for in vivo measurements, a phantom experiment was conducted, for which the T2 values obtained with the different techniques of interest were compared with the criterion standard (single-echo SE sequence, multiple acquisitions with varying echo time). Repeatability and temporal reproducibility studies for the different techniques were also conducted on the phantom. Finally, an in vivo study was conducted on 12 volunteers to compare the techniques that offer acceptable acquisition time for clinical use and either address or correct respiratory motion. RESULTS: For the phantom study, the DESS and T2-preparation techniques presented the lowest precision (ρ2 = 0.9504 and ρ2 = 0.9849 respectively), and showed a poor repeatability/reproducibility compared with the other techniques. The strategy relying on SE-EPI showed the best precision and accuracy (ρ2 = 0.9994 and Cb = 0.9995). GRAPPATINI exhibited a very good precision (ρ2 = 0.9984). For the technique relying on radial TSE, the precision was not as good as GRAPPATINI (ρ2 = 0.9872). The in vivo study demonstrated good respiratory motion management for all of the selected techniques. It also showed that T2 estimate ranges were different from one method to another. For GRAPPATINI and radial TSE techniques, there were significant differences between all the different types of organs of interest. CONCLUSIONS: To perform T2 measurement in the abdominal-pelvic region, one should favor a technique with acceptable acquisition time for clinical use, with proper respiratory motion management, with good repeatability, reproducibility, and precision. In this study, the techniques relying respectively on SE-EPI, radial TSE, and GRAPPATINI appeared as good candidates.

Management of persistent occiput posterior position: The added value of manual rotation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the delivery rate in the occiput posterior position according to the result of manual rotation performed in the case of persistent occiput posterior position. Secondary objectives were perinatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in two French tertiary care units. All women with a singleton pregnancy after 37 weeks of gestation with a fetus in persistent occiput posterior position and an attempt of manual rotation were included. The main outcome was the occiput position at delivery. The secondary outcomes were duration of labor, mode of delivery, and perineal tears. Two groups were compared according to the result of manual rotation. RESULTS: In total, 460 women were included, with a manual rotation success of 62.4%. The success was significantly associated with a decrease in occiput posterior position at vaginal delivery (1.4% vs 57.2%, P < 0.0001), cesarean (0.7% vs 17.9%, P < 0.0001), operative vaginal delivery (40.1% vs 78%, P < 0.0001), episiotomy (40.1% vs 54.9%, P < 0.0001), and obstetric anal sphincter injury (3.1% vs 8.7%, P = 0.008) compared with a failure. CONCLUSION: An attempt of manual rotation in the case of persistent occiput posterior position is associated with decreased rates of occiput posterior position at delivery, operative delivery, and anal sphincter injuries.

Manual rotation of occiput posterior or transverse positions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess the association between spontaneous vaginal delivery and manual rotation during labor for occiput posterior or transverse positions. Our secondary objective was to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials covered the period from January 2000 to September 2021, without language restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The eligibility criteria included all randomized trials with singleton pregnancies at ≥37 weeks of gestation comparing the manual rotation groups with the control groups. The primary outcome was the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Additional secondary outcomes were rate of occiput posterior position at delivery, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, obstetrical anal sphincter injury, prolonged second stage of labor, shoulder dystocia, neonatal acidosis, and phototherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed according to types of position (occiput posterior or occiput transverse), techniques used (whole-hand or digital rotation), and parity (nulliparous or parous). METHODS: The quality of each study was evaluated with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, known as RoB 2. The meta-analysis used random-effects models depending on their heterogeneity, and risks ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: Here, 7 of 384 studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected. They included 1402 women: 704 in the manual rotation groups and 698 in the control groups. Manual rotation was associated with a higher rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery: 64.9% vs 59.5% (risk ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.16; P=.005; 95% prediction interval, 0.90-1.32). This association was no longer significant after stratification by parity or technique used. Manual rotation was associated with spontaneous vaginal delivery only for the occiput posterior position (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.15). Furthermore, it was associated with a reduction in occiput posterior or transverse positions at delivery (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.87) and episiotomies (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.98). The groups did not differ significantly for cesarean deliveries, operative vaginal deliveries, or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Manual rotation increased the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery.

Comparative evaluation of the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on perinatal experience: A prospective multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare in the early postpartum the perinatal experience during a COVID-19 related lockdown ('lockdown' group) and a pandemic control group subject to looser restrictions. DESIGN AND SETTING: This national multicentre prospective cohort study took place in four French maternity units. POPULATION: Women were recruited during the postpartum stay for the lockdown and pandemic control groups, according to their enrolment period. Both faced the same labour and delivery restrictions but only the pandemic control group could have a postpartum visitor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the perinatal experience during childbirth, assessed by the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS) self-administered questionnaire, completed before discharge. RESULTS: The study included 596 women and analysed 571 of them: 260 in the lockdown group and 311 in the pandemic control group. The mean LAS score was lower in the lockdown group (161.1 ± 26.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 157.8-164.3 versus 163.3 ± 24.0, 95% CI 160.6-166.0; P = 0.289). In multivariable analysis, the LAS score was lower in the lockdown group (-6.2 points, P = 0.009), in women with caesarean (-21.6 points, P < 0.001) versus spontaneous deliveries, and among women financially impacted by the lockdown (-6.4 points, P = 0.007) or who experienced restrictions during childbirth (-8.1 points, P < 0.001). The LAS score rose with the prenatal care quality score (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The perinatal experience was more negatively affected by lockdown restrictions than by the looser pandemic restrictions for controls, but mode of delivery remained the main factor influencing this experience.

Performance of antenatal imaging to predict placenta accreta spectrum degree of severity.

INTRODUCTION: In cases of placenta accreta spectrum, a precise antenatal diagnosis of the suspected degree of invasion is essential for the planning of individual management strategies at delivery. The aim of this work was to evaluate the respective performances of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the antenatal assessment of the severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders included in the database. The secondary objective was to identify descriptors related to the severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All the cases included in the database for which antenatal imaging data were available were analyzed. The rates of occurrence of each ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging descriptor were reported and compared between the Group "Accreta-Increta" (FIGO grades 1 & 2) and the Group "Percreta" (FIGO grade 3). RESULTS: Antenatal imaging data were available for 347 women (347/442, 78.5%), of which 105 were included in the Group "Accreta - Increta" (105/347, 30.2%) and 213 (213/347, 61.4%) in the Group "Percreta". Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in addition to ultrasound in 135 women (135/347, 38.9%). After adjustment for all ultrasound descriptors in multivariate analysis, only the presence of a bladder wall interruption was associated with a significant higher risk of percreta (Odds ratio 3.23, Confidence interval 1.33-7.79). No magnetic resonance imaging sign was significantly correlated with the degree of severity. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate mild from severe placenta accreta spectrum disorders is very poor. To date, the benefit of additional magnetic resonance imaging has not been demonstrated.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in planned versus emergency cesarean delivery for placenta accreta spectrum: A multinational database study.

INTRODUCTION: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a condition often resulting in severe maternal morbidity. Scheduled delivery by an experienced team has been shown to improve maternal outcomes; however, the benefits must be weighed against the risk of iatrogenic prematurity. The aim of this study is to investigate the rates of emergency delivery seen for antenatally suspected PAS and compare the resulting outcomes in the 15 referral centers of the International Society for PAS (IS-PAS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen centers provided cases between 2008 and 2019. The women included were divided into two groups according to whether they had a planned or an emergency cesarean delivery. Delivery was defined as "planned" when performed at a time and date to suit the team. All the remaining cases were classified as "emergency". Maternal characteristics and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups according to gestation at delivery. RESULTS: In all, 356 women were included. Of these, 239 (67%) underwent a planned delivery and 117 (33%) an emergency delivery. Vaginal bleeding was the indication for emergency delivery in 41 of the 117 women (41%). There were no significant differences in terms of blood loss, transfusion rates or major maternal morbidity between planned and emergency deliveries. However, the rate of maternal intensive therapy unit admission was increased with emergency delivery (45% vs 33%, P = .02). Antepartum hemorrhage was the only independent predictor of emergency delivery (aOR: 4.3, 95% confidence interval 2.4-7.7). Emergency delivery due to vaginal bleeding was more frequent with false-positive cases (antenatally suspected but not confirmed as PAS at delivery) and the milder grades of PAS (accreta/increta). The rate of infants experiencing any major neonatal morbidity was 25% at 34+1 to 36+0  weeks and 19% at >36+0  weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency delivery in centers of excellence did not increase blood loss, transfusion rates or maternal morbidity. The single greatest risk factor for emergency delivery was antenatal hemorrhage. When adequate expertise and resources are available, to defer delivery in women with no significant antenatal bleeding and no risk factors for pre-term birth until >36+0  weeks can be considered to improve fetal outcomes. Further studies are needed to investigate this fully.