Malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour: lymph node ratio and Ki67 are predictors of recurrence after curative resections.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNENs) are generally associated with a good prognosis after radical resection. In other pancreatic malignancies predictors of recurrence and the role of lymph node ratio (LNR) are well known, but both have been scarcely investigated for malignant PNETs. METHODS: The prospective database from the surgical Department of Verona University was queried. Clinical and pathological data of all patients with resected malignant PNET between 1990 and 2008 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (male/female ratio=1) with a median age of 58 years (33-78) entered in the study. Twenty-nine (51%) patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and 28 (49%) distal pancreatectomy. Postoperative mortality was nil with a 37% morbidity rate. There were 36 (63%) patients with lymph node metastases (N1). Of these, 23 (64%) had a lymph node ratio (LNR) >0 and ≤0.20 and 13 (36%) had a LNR >0.20. The median overall survival and the median disease free survival (DFS) were 190 and 80 months, respectively. Recurrent disease was identified in 24 patients (42%) with a 2 and 5-year DFS rate of 82% and 49%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, LNR >0.20 (HR=2.75) and a value of Ki67 >5% (HR=3.39) were significant predictors of recurrence (P<0.02). CONCLUSIONS: After resection for malignant PNETs, LNR and a Ki67 >5% are the most powerful predictors of recurrence. The presence of these factors should be considered for addressing patients to adjuvant treatment in future clinical trials.

Tumor size correlates with malignancy in nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor.

BACKGROUND: Tumor size is a criterion of staging in nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors as well as a predictor of outcome after curative resection. This study analyzes the correlation between tumor size and malignancy in patients with nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. METHODS: All patients with nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors who underwent curative resection (R0) at our institution between 1990 and 2008 were considered. Their clinicopathologic characteristics were compared among 3 different groups according to tumor size. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Over the study period, 177 patients were identified. Overall, 90 patients (51%) had a tumor size ≤2 cm (group 1), 46 (26%) had tumor size between >2 cm and ≤4 cm (group 2), and 41 (23%) had tumor size >4 cm (group 3). Tumors ≤2 cm were more frequently incidentally discovered (group 1, 57% vs group 2, 51% vs group 3, 32%; P = .014) and benign (group 1, 81% vs group 2, 65% vs group 3, 5%; P < .0001). The presence of a nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor >2 cm and a nonincidental diagnosis of the tumor were independent predictors of malignancy at multivariable analysis. None of the 51 patients (29%) with a pancreatic endocrine tumor ≤2 cm that was incidentally diagnosed died of disease. CONCLUSION: A strict correlation between tumor size and malignancy in nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors was demonstrated. A nonoperative management could be advocated for tumors ≤2 cm when discovered incidentally.

Role of resection of the primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour only in patients with unresectable metastatic liver disease: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the only curative option for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs), but its indication is limited by metastatic disease in most patients. Indication for removing the primary lesion only in the setting of unresectable liver disease is controversial. The present systematic review aims at determining the potential bene- fits (survival, progression-free survival) or harms (morbidity, mortality) of surgical resection of the primary lesion only in patients with PNETs and unresectable metastases. METHODS: Medline was queried for studies reporting the outcome of PNET patients with unresectable liver metastases whenever there was an explicit comparison between resection of the primary lesion only ('active treatment') and no resection ('non-active treatment'). The primary outcome was survival; possible secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, treatment-related mortality and morbidity, and relief of symptoms. RESULTS: Only 3 cohort studies found were eligible and analysed; no meta-analysis could be performed. The number of patients undergoing 'active treatment' varied from 16 to 20, with a percentage ranging from 17 to 39% of cohorts. Survival was longer in patients who received 'active treatment' in 2 studies, and the 5-year survival rate also seemed higher, without significant complications. DISCUSSION: Available data suggest a possible benefit of resection of the primary lesion only in this setting. However, a bias towards a more aggressive surgical approach in patients with a better performance status or less advanced disease seems likely, and no conclusion can be drawn except for the need of randomised trials. We calculated that such a trial would require at least 118 patients per arm.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors: improved TNM staging and histopathological grading permit a clinically efficient prognostic stratification of patients.

Pancreatic endocrine tumors are rare diseases and devising a clinically effective prognostic stratification of patients is a major clinical challenge. This study aimed at assessing whether the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM)-based staging and proliferative activity-based grading recently proposed by the European NeuroEndocrine Tumors Society (ENETS) have clinical value. TNM was applied to 274 patients with histologically diagnosed pancreatic endocrine tumors operated from 1991 to 2005, with last follow-up at December 2007. According to World Health Organization (WHO) classification, 246 were well-differentiated neoplasms (51 benign, 56 uncertain behavior, 139 carcinomas) and 28 poorly differentiated carcinomas. Grading was based on Ki67 immunohistochemistry. Survival analysis not only ascertained the prognostic value of the TNM system but also highlighted that in the absence of nodal and distant metastasis, infiltration and tumor dimensions over 4 cm had prognostic significance. T parameters were then appropriately modified to reflect this weakness. The 5-year survival for modified TNM stages I, II, III and IV were 100, 93, 65 and 35%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified TNM stages as independent predictors of death, in which stages II, III and IV showed a risk of death of 7, 29 and 58 times higher than stage I tumors (P<0.0001). Ki67-based grading resulted an independent predictor of survival with cut-offs at 5 and 20%. In conclusion, WHO classification assigns clinically significant diagnostic categories to pancreatic endocrine tumors that need prognostic stratification by applying a staging system. The ENETS-TNM provides the best option, but it requires some modifications to be fully functional. The modified TNM described in this study ameliorates the clinical applicability and prediction of outcome of the ENETS-TNM; it (i) assigns a risk of death proportional to the stage at the time of diagnosis, and (ii) allows a clinically based staging of patients, as the T parameters as modified permit their clinical-radiological recognition. Ki67-based grading discerns prognosis of patients with same stage diseases.

Risk factors for sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors: a case-control study of prospectively evaluated patients.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) are heterogeneous tumors with increasing prevalence. Little is known about the molecular pathogenesis and risk factors for the occurrence of sporadic PETs. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with the occurrence of sporadic PETs. METHODS: A case-control study comprising 162 sporadic PETs and 648 controls was undertaken. Subjects were interviewed using a specific questionnaire on demographics and potential risk factors, including smoking, alcohol, height, weight, medical history, and family history of cancer. A multiple hierarchical logistic regression analysis was performed with a stepwise variable- selection procedure. RESULTS: A first-degree family history of any cancer was a significant risk factor (odds ratio (OR) 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-3.2). Among the different cancer sites, first-degree family history of pancreatic adenocarcinoma was more frequent in PETs than in controls (4.3 vs. 1.2%; P=0.01). A high alcohol intake (OR 4.8; 95% CI: 2.4-9.5), history of chronic pancreatitis (CP) (OR 8.6; 95% CI: 1.4-51), and recent-onset diabetes (OR 40.1; 95% CI: 4.8-328.9) were all independent risk factors. The history of diabetes was also associated with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This case-control study identified family history of any cancer (and to a less extent of pancreatic adenocarcinoma), CP, high alcohol intake, and recent-onset diabetes as risk factors for PET, thus suggesting a possible partial overlap with risk factors for exocrine pancreatic carcinogenesis.

Isolated blunt duodenal trauma: delayed diagnosis and favorable outcome with "quadruple tube" decompression.

CONTEXT: Isolated blunt duodenal injury is a rare finding associated with high morbidity and significant mortality. The early identification of a duodenal injury is usually difficult, considering the anatomical location of the duodenum and lack of peritoneal signs and diagnostic delay is part of the clinical picture in most cases. CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old man was admitted to our hospital after a motor vehicle collision. At admission he underwent emergency surgery because of lower extremities fractures. Twelve hours later he started to complain an increasing abdominal pain; blood tests showed serum amylase up to 180 U/L and a CT scan demonstrated a perforation of the third duodenal portion. At laparotomy a Grade III injury of the duodenum was evident. The laceration was sutured and a "quadruple-tube" decompression was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. One year after surgery he is well without any long-term complication. CONCLUSION: A high degree of suspicion is necessary for early diagnosis of blunt duodenal trauma and CT scan should be performed in case of all significant epigastric trauma. In most cases primary direct repair of duodenal wounds can be safely achieved and duodenal decompression via triple or quadriple tube technique is required to decrease the risk of duodenal fistula.

Ampullary somatostatinomas and jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a patient with Von Recklinghausen's disease.

Von Recklinghausen's disease is an autosomal dominant hereditary disease associated with a wide number of neoplasms. We report a case of a 47-year-old Caucasian male affected by Von Recklinghausen's disease who developed a malignant somatostatinoma of the papilla major and minor associated with jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumour with uncertain behaviour. At laparotomy, multiple hepatic metastases were evident. Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy, jejunal resection, extensive lymphadenectomy and multiple hepatic wedge resections were performed. The patient was alive without recurrence after 24 mo. This is the fourth case reported in the world literature of a patient with Von Recklinghausen's disease associated with periampullary somatostatinomas and jejunal stromal tumor. In patients with Von Recklinghausen's disease who complain of gastrointestinal symptoms, a high suspicion index for periampullary endocrine tumours and/or gastrointestinal stromal tumour is required. An aggressive surgical approach seems to give long term survival also in metastatic patients.

The determinant factors of recurrence following resection for ductal pancreatic cancer.

Long-term survival for patients with pancreatic carcinoma is low, even following resection. Most patients who undergo curative treatment, develop recurrence usually at the same site of resection or in the liver. Failure seals the fate of the patient. Local recurrence occurs frequently; however, it is rarely a direct cause of death. In fact, most patients die from distant metastases. From a clinical point of view, it is important to distinguish recurrence from relapse. In fact, recurrence can be recognized as the reappearance of the disease in the surgical bed, often due to inadequate surgical clearance. On the other hand, the concept of relapse should be much more related to the appearance of the disease in a distant site. Both underestimated staging of the diagnosis and the biological features of the tumor can cause relapse. Up to now, there have only been a few reviews on the incidence and pattern of failure following resection. Detailed knowledge of the recurring sites of pancreatic carcinoma and study of the factors influencing disease-free survival are significant in developing neoadjuvant, surgical and adjuvant treatment. The aim of this review is to point out the major factors most commonly identified as determinants of both recurrence and relapse.

Surgical strategy in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Endocrine pancreatic tumors are rare and their surgical treatment is often debated. This review analyzes the management and the different indications in functioning and non-functioning neoplasms. The choice among different procedures is described as well as the role of intra operative ultrasound. Moreover, the different patterns of tumor spread are considered (local, loco-regional and metastatic) along with the indications according to the main controversies relating to cytoreductive surgery, transplantation and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 patients.

Nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors: a multicenter clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: Nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors (NFPTs) are rare neoplasms that have been the object of few studies that have involved only small numbers of patients. This study was carried out to obtain a comprehensive and up-to-date clinical picture of these tumors. METHODS: A total of 184 patients with NFPT admitted to three Italian hospitals in the last 15 yr were studied. The diagnosis of NFPT was confirmed histologically using conventional and immunohistochemical techniques. Data were obtained from the medical charts or directly from the patients. RESULTS: There were 85 men (46.2%) and 99 women (53.8%). The mean age at diagnosis was 55.2 yr (range 17-82 yr). The percentage of smokers and alcohol drinkers was similar to that in the general population. Seven patients (3.9%) had a family history of exocrine pancreatic carcinoma. In 120 cases (65.2%), the diagnosis was made after workup for pain or other symptoms, in the remaining 64 cases (34.8%), the tumor was discovered incidentally by ultrasound; in this group survival was significantly greater than it was for the symptomatic patients (p=0.0043). Survival was also found to be improved by tumor resection (p<0.0001), absence of metastases (p<0.0001), and small tumor size (< or =3 cm) (p<0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: NFPTs were slightly more frequent in women and were diagnosed most often in middle-aged individuals. No risk factors other than a family history of exocrine pancreatic carcinoma were found. Tumor discovery while patients were still asymptomatic, tumor resection, absence of metastases, and tumor size < or =3 cm significantly prolonged survival.