Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 11(7)2021 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34209961

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The angle between the inter-ventricular septum and the ascending aorta can be measured during a sonographic fetal survey while viewing the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT angle). Our aim was to compare the LVOT angle between fetuses with and without conotruncal cardiac anomaliesrmations. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we compared the LVOT angle between normal fetuses, at different gestational age, and fetuses with cardiac malformations. RESULTS: The study included 302 fetuses screened at gestational age of 12-39 weeks. The LVOT angle ranged from 127 to 163 degrees (mean 148.2), in 293 fetuses with normal hearts, and was not correlated with gestational age. The LVOT angle was significantly wider in fetuses with D-transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA, eight fetuses) and valvar aortic stenosis (AS, three fetuses), than in fetuses with normal hearts (164.8 ± 5.0 vs. 148.2 ± 5.4, respectively, p < 0.001). Conversely, the LVOT angle was significantly narrower in fetuses with complete atrioventricular canal defect (AVC, eight fetuses), than in fetuses with normal hearts (124.8 ± 2.4 vs. 148.2 ± 5.4, respectively, p < 0.001). On ROC analysis, an angle of 159.6 degrees or higher had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97.3% for the detection of TGA or AS, whereas an angle of 128.8 degrees or lower had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.7% for the detection of AVC defect. CONCLUSIONS: The LVOT angle is constant during pregnancy, and differs significantly in fetuses with TGA/AS, and AVC, compared to fetuses with normal hearts (wider and narrower, respectively).

2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 218(4): 453.e1-453.e7, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29425836

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient compliance and tight glycemic control have been demonstrated to improve outcome in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. The use of advanced technological tools, including smartphone-based platforms, to improve medical care and outcomes has been demonstrated in various fields of medicine, but only a few small studies were performed with gestational diabetes mellitus patients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the impact of introducing a smartphone-based daily feedback and communication platform between gestational diabetes mellitus patients and their physicians, on patient compliance, glycemic control, pregnancy outcome, and patient satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial. Newly diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus patients presenting to our multidisciplinary diabetes-in-pregnancy clinic were randomized to: (1) routine biweekly prenatal clinic care (control group); or (2) additional daily detailed feedback on their compliance and glycemic control from the clinic team via an application installed on their smartphone (smartphone group). The primary outcome was patient compliance defined as the actual blood glucose measurements/instructed measurements ×100. The secondary outcomes included diabetes-control parameters, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes. The study was adequately powered to detect a 20% difference in patient compliance, based on a preliminary phase that demonstrated 70% baseline compliance to glucose measurements. RESULTS: A total of 120 newly diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus patients were analyzed. The 2 groups did not differ in terms of age, parity, education, body mass index, family history, maternal comorbidities, oral glucose tolerance test values, and hemoglobin A1C at randomization. The smartphone group demonstrated higher level of compliance (84 ± 0.16% vs 66 ± 0.28%, P < .001); lower mean blood glucose (105.1 ± 8.6 mg/dL vs 112.6 ± 7.4 mg/dL, P < .001); lower rates of off-target measurements both fasting (4.7 ± 0.4% vs 8.4 ± 0.6%, P < .001) and 1-hour postprandial (7.7 ± 0.8% vs 14.3 ± 0.8%, P < .001); and a lower rate of pregnancies requiring insulin treatment (13.3% vs 30.0%, P = .044). The rates of macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, shoulder dystocia, and other delivery and neonatal complications did not differ between the groups. Patients in the smartphone group reported excellent satisfaction from the use of the application and from their overall prenatal care. CONCLUSION: Introduction of a smartphone-based daily feedback and communication platform between gestational diabetes mellitus patients and the multidisciplinary diabetes-in-pregnancy clinic team improved patient compliance and glycemic control, and lowered the rate of insulin treatment.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Feedback , Mobile Applications , Patient Compliance , Smartphone , Adult , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Patient Care Team , Patient Satisfaction , Postprandial Period , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL