Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 132
Filter
1.
Ann Oncol ; 35(4): 392-401, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate containing cytotoxic SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. SG received accelerated US Food and Drug Administration approval for locally advanced (LA) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor, based on cohort 1 of the TROPHY-U-01 study. Mutations in the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene are associated with increased adverse events (AEs) with irinotecan-based therapies. Whether UGT1A1 status could impact SG toxicity and efficacy remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label, phase II registrational study. Cohort 1 includes patients with LA or mUC who progressed after platinum- and checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies. SG was administered at 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per central review; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Post hoc safety analyses were exploratory with descriptive statistics. Updated analyses include longer follow-up. RESULTS: Cohort 1 included 113 patients. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, ORR was 28% (95% CI 20.2% to 37.6%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 months (95% CI 3.5-6.9 months) and 10.9 months (95% CI 8.9-13.8 months), respectively. Occurrence of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs and treatment-related discontinuation were consistent with prior reports. UGT1A1 status was wildtype (∗1|∗1) in 40%, heterozygous (∗1|∗28) in 42%, homozygous (∗28|∗28) in 12%, and missing in 6% of patients. In patients with ∗1|∗1, ∗1|∗28, and ∗28|∗28 genotypes, any grade treatment-related AEs occurred in 93%, 94%, and 100% of patients, respectively, and were managed similarly regardless of UGT1A1 status. CONCLUSIONS: With longer follow-up, the ORR remains high in patients with heavily pretreated LA or mUC. Safety data were consistent with the known SG toxicity profile. AE incidence varied across UGT1A1 subgroups; however, discontinuation rates remained relatively low for all groups.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Immunoconjugates , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Irinotecan , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/genetics , Platinum/therapeutic use , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/genetics , Immunoconjugates/adverse effects
3.
Prog Urol ; 30(12S): S136-S251, 2020 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349424

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: - The purpose of the guidelines national committee ccAFU was to propose updated french guidelines for prostate cancer. METHODS: - A Medline search was achieved between 2018 and 2020, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer (PCA), and to evaluate the different references specifying their levels of evidence. RESULTS: - The guidelines outline the genetics, epidemiology and diagnosis of prostate cancer, as well as the concepts of screening and early detection. MRI, the gold standard imaging test for localized cancer, is indicated before prostate biopsies are performed. The therapeutic methods are detailed and indicated according to the clinical situation. Active surveillance is a reference therapeutic option for low-risk tumours with a low evolutionary risk. Early salvage radiotherapy is indicated in case of biological recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the backbone therapy in the metastatic stage. Docetaxel in combination with ADT improves overall first-line survival in synchronous metastatic prostate cancer. In this situation, the combination of ADT with abiraterone is also a standard of care regardless of tumor volume. Recent data indicate that ADT should be indicated with a new generation of hormone therapy (Apalutamide or Enzalutamide) in metastatic synchronous or metachronous patients, regardless of tumour volume. Local treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy improves survival in synchronous oligometastatic patients. Targeted treatment of metastases is being evaluated. In patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), new therapies that have emerged in recent years help to better control tumor progression and improve survival. CONCLUSION: - These updated french guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Clinical Protocols , Decision Trees , Humans , Male
4.
Prog Urol ; 30(8-9): 430-438, 2020.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32517891

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the Cancerology Committee of the French Association of urology (CCAFU) is to propose an update of the guidelines in the management of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 2018 to 2020 was conducted by the CCAFU Findings. Several patterns can be defined at this stage depending on prognostic, metastatic volume, and whether metastases are synchronous or metachronous. Androgenic deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the mainstay of treatment at the metastatic stage. Docetaxel in combination with ADT improves overall survival in synchronous metastatic prostate cancer. In this situation, the combination of ADT with abiraterone is also a standard of care regardless of tumor volume. Recent data have led to the recommendation that ADT should be used in conjunction with a new generation hormone therapy (Apalutamide or Enzalutamide) in metastatic synchronous or metachronous patients, regardless of tumour volume. Local treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy improves survival in synchronous oligometastatic patients. Metastases-directed therapy is being evaluated. CONCLUSION: This update of the French recommendations should help improve the management of patients with prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis
5.
Prog Urol ; 28(12S): S79-S130, 2018 11.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392712

ABSTRACT

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007. C'est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l'article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.


Subject(s)
Medical Oncology/standards , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , France , Humans , Male , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards
7.
Prog Urol ; 28 Suppl 1: R81-R132, 2018 11.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31610875

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the guidelines national committee ccAFU was to propose updated French guidelines for prostate cancer. METHODS: A Medline search was achieved between 2016 and 2018, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer, and to evaluate the different references specifying their levels of evidence. RESULTS: Epidemiology, classification, staging systems, diagnostic evaluation of prostate cancer are reported. Disease management options are detailed. Recommandations are reported according to the different clinical situations. Active surveillance is a major option in low risk PCa. Radical prostatectomy remains a standard of care of localized PCa. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the technical standard. A dose of≥76Gy is recommended. Moderate hypofractionation provides short-term biochemical control comparable to conventional fractionation. In case of intermediate risk PCa, radiotherapy can be combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In case of high-risk disease, long-term ADT remains the standard of care. ADT is the backbone therapy of metastatic disease. In men with metastases at first presentation, upfront chemotherapy combined with ADT should be considered as a standard. In this situation, the combination of ADT and abiraterone acetate also becomes a new standard. In case of metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), new hormonal treatments and chemotherapy provide a better control of tumor progression and increase survival. CONCLUSION: These updated French guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer.

8.
Prog Urol ; 27 Suppl 1: S95-S143, 2016 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27846936

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the guidelines national committee CCAFU was to propose updated french guidelines for localized and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A Medline search was achieved between 2013 and 2016, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of PCa, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS: Epidemiology, classification, staging systems, diagnostic evaluation are reported. Disease management options are detailed. Recommandations are reported according to the different clinical situations. Active surveillance is a major option in low risk PCa. Radical prostatectomy remains a standard of care of localized PCa. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the technical standard. A dose of > 74Gy is recommended. Moderate hypofractionation provides short-term biochemical control comparable to conventional fractionation. In case of intermediate risk PCa, radiotherapy can be combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In case of high risk disease, long-term ADT remains the standard of care. ADT is the backbone therapy of metastatic disease. In men with metastases at first presentation, upfront chemotherapy combined with ADT should be considered as a new standard. In case of metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), new hormonal treatments and chemotherapy provide a better control of tumor progression and increase survival. CONCLUSIONS: These updated french guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer. © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male
10.
Ann Oncol ; 27(7): 1311-6, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27091807

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) is an actionable target in bladder cancer. Preclinical studies show that anti-FGFR3 treatment slows down tumor growth, suggesting that this tyrosine kinase receptor is a candidate for personalized bladder cancer treatment, particularly in patients with mutated FGFR3. We addressed tumor heterogeneity in a large multicenter, multi-laboratory study, as this may have significant impact on therapeutic response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated possible FGFR3 heterogeneity by the PCR-SNaPshot method in the superficial and deep compartments of tumors obtained by transurethral resection (TUR, n = 61) and in radical cystectomy (RC, n = 614) specimens and corresponding cancer-positive lymph nodes (LN+, n = 201). RESULTS: We found FGFR3 mutations in 13/34 (38%) T1 and 8/27 (30%) ≥T2-TUR samples, with 100% concordance between superficial and deeper parts in T1-TUR samples. Of eight FGFR3 mutant ≥T2-TUR samples, only 4 (50%) displayed the mutation in the deeper part. We found 67/614 (11%) FGFR3 mutations in RC specimens. FGFR3 mutation was associated with pN0 (P < 0.001) at RC. In 10/201 (5%) LN+, an FGFR3 mutation was found, all concordant with the corresponding RC specimen. In the remaining 191 cases, RC and LN+ were both wild type. CONCLUSIONS: FGFR3 mutation status seems promising to guide decision-making on adjuvant anti-FGFR3 therapy as it appeared homogeneous in RC and LN+. Based on the results of TUR, the deep part of the tumor needs to be assessed if neoadjuvant anti-FGFR3 treatment is considered. We conclude that studies on the heterogeneity of actionable molecular targets should precede clinical trials with these drugs in the perioperative setting.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3/genetics , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Aged , Clinical Decision-Making , Cystectomy , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Genetic Heterogeneity , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Perioperative Period , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3/antagonists & inhibitors , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
11.
Breast ; 24(6): 718-22, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26387602

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since the publication of the Bolero-2 trial, everolimus has entered the routine care for advanced endocrine resistant luminal breast cancer (BC). We evaluated our practice 2 years after the French marketing authorization (July 2012). METHODS: One hundred and twenty three consecutive patients were treated with everolimus combined with endocrine treatment in two French Cancer Centers. All patients had luminal (ER positive, HER2 negative) BC and had been previously treated with endocrine therapy for advanced disease. RESULTS: Median age at initiation of everolimus was 63 y (36-84). Median delay from cancer diagnosis to everolimus was 12.6 y (1.3-34.8). Grade 2 or 3 side effects were experienced by 49.6% and 32.5% of the patients, respectively. Most frequent side effects were grade 2/3 mucositis (32.6%/11.2%), grade 1/2 decreased appetite (24.4%/13.8%), and grade 1/2 rash (28.5%/13.8%). At a median follow up of 10 months, median progression free survival was 9 months (0.4-26+), and median overall survival was 21 months (0.4-26+). CONCLUSIONS: In routine practice everolimus efficacy appears very close to the Bolero-2 results, although in more heavily pretreated patients. Everolimus based therapy appears feasible and side effects are similar to those previously reported. These data support the use of everolimus in daily practice.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Everolimus/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Appetite/drug effects , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Exanthema/chemically induced , Female , France , Humans , Middle Aged , Mucositis/chemically induced , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Retrospective Studies , Time-to-Treatment , Treatment Outcome
12.
Cancer Radiother ; 19(3): 220-7, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25921704

ABSTRACT

Androgen deprivation therapy is widely used in combination with radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. The knowledge of the biology of the androgen axis could help the radiation oncologist to combine both modalities in an efficient way. Moreover, new drugs have recently been approved and their role in combination with radiation needs pre-clinical and clinical studies. This review summarized the main data on the biology of androgen receptor and the potential implications for the physician. Mechanisms of interactions between androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy are also presented and discussed.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgens , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Proteins/physiology , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Receptors, Androgen/physiology , Adenocarcinoma/blood , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Alternative Splicing , Combined Modality Therapy , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/antagonists & inhibitors , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Proteins/drug effects , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/blood , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/drug therapy , Orchiectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/drug effects , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Testosterone/biosynthesis , Testosterone/blood , Transcription, Genetic
13.
Breast ; 24(4): 376-83, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25913287

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The LORHA study described the clinical features of patients and tumours in long-term responders from a subset of breast cancer patients who responded to 1st-line trastuzumab and without disease progression. METHODS: This was an ambispective, multicentre, non-interventional study conducted in 57 centres in France. Eligible patients were women with HER2+metastatic or locally-advanced breast cancer, treated with 1st-line therapy, progression-free for ≥3 years after starting trastuzumab, and followed-up for 12 months. RESULTS: 160 patients were recruited, 128 were included in the efficacy analysis subset (median age: 61 years; [34-95 years]). A majority (88%) had invasive ductal carcinoma; 53% had SBR grade III carcinoma, and 58% were positive for hormonal receptors. The median time since diagnosis was 8 years [3-26 years]. The most frequent metastatic sites were the bone, liver, lymph nodes, and lungs in 43%, 35%, 20% and 19% of patients, respectively. The median duration of 1st-line trastuzumab was 4.5 years [0.8-12.1], combined with paclitaxel and docetaxel in 35 and 72 patients, respectively. Median PFS (progression-free survival) was 6.4 years [5.7; Not Reached]. No trastuzumab-related deaths were observed. In the safety analysis subset (N = 134), 3 cardiac adverse events considered related to trastuzumab were recorded in 3 patients (2.2%), and only one prospective congestive cardiac failure was of grade ≥3. CONCLUSIONS: The LORHA study showed that long term responders to 1st-line trastuzumab for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer could achieve a median PFS of more than 6 years, with an acceptable safety profile.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Survivors , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Docetaxel , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Retrospective Studies , Taxoids/administration & dosage
14.
Prog Urol ; 25(3): 128-37, 2015 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25595615

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis, localization of recurrence in the management of prostate cancer patients with increasing concentrations of tumor serum markers is crucial for treatment planning of the patients. The present review describes the role of prostate MRI and (18) Fcholine PET/computed tomography (CT) in tumor detection and extent, when there is a suspicion of residual or recurrent disease after treatment of prostate cancer. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching in the PUB MED/MEDLINE database searching for articles in French or English published between the last 12years. RESULTS: In patient with a clinical suspicion of recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer, imaging can be used to distinguish between local recurrence and metastatic disease. (11)C-choline PET/CT and pelvic multiparametric MR imaging (mp MRI) are complementary in this indication. In this paper, the current status of imaging techniques used for the staging of patients with suspected locally recurrent or metastatic disease in patients treated for prostate cancer were reviewed. CONCLUSION: Mp MRI of the prostate may be valuable imaging modality for the detection and localization of local recurrence. C-choline PET/CT offers an advantage in detecting metastatic disease to lymph node and bone.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Choline/analogs & derivatives , Fluorine Radioisotopes , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Multimodal Imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
15.
Prog Urol ; 25(1): 1-10, 2015 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25454776

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The widespread use of prostate cancer screening has led to a stage migration resulting in an increase in the diagnosis of low-risk disease, which currently accounts for 40-50% of diagnosed forms. New therapeutic strategies have been developed in order to minimize the risk of overtreatment. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature over the past 20 years was performed using the Medline database. The literature selection was based on evidence and practical considerations. RESULTS: Low-risk tumors are conventionally defined by the d'Amico classification. The use of multiparametric MRI helps to better characterize these tumors. The contribution of molecular biology remains to be determined in clinical practice. Novel therapeutic options for low-risk disease are currently being evaluated. CONCLUSION: The new therapeutic strategies are evolving. They seek to reduce overtreatment without compromising oncological success.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/classification , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Disease Progression , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Patient Selection , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Secondary Prevention , Watchful Waiting
16.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 148(2): 345-53, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25318926

ABSTRACT

This single-center prospective study aims to assess the outcomes and the toxicities related to the concurrent administration of trastuzumab (T) with adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy (RT) in localized breast cancer. Data of 308 patients were analyzed. T was delivered every 3 weeks (loading dose of 8 mg/kg, then 6 mg/kg) for 1 year. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), measured by echocardiography or myocardial scintigraphy, was considered as impaired when below 55%. Toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out using the Cox model. Median follow-up was 50.2 months (13.0-126.0). Median age at diagnosis was 52 years (25-83). Internal mammary node (IMN) RT was performed in 227 patients (73.7%). After completion of RT, 26 patients (8.4%) presented an impaired LVEF: 17 (5.5%) of grade 1, 7 (2.3%) of grade 2, and 2 (0.6%) of grade 3. At 48 months, locoregional control rate was 95% [95% CI 92; 98], and overall survival rate was 98% [95% CI 96; 100]. In univariate analysis, neither the treated breast side (p = 0.655) nor IMN RT (p = 0.213) exposed patients to LVEF alteration. In multivariate analysis, clinical lymph node involvement was associated with an increased risk of locoregional and distant recurrence (p = 0.016 and p = 0.007, respectively). In this prospective study, the toxicities of concurrent T with locoregional breast RT were acceptable and the outcomes favorable. Longer follow-up is warranted to confirm these results.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/mortality , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Survival Rate , Trastuzumab
17.
Cancer Radiother ; 18(7): 681-4, 2014 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24981410

ABSTRACT

Advanced gastric cancer or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer after a failure of first line chemotherapy have poor outcome. Hereby, we present the first patient treated by radiotherapy with concurrent everolimus, a mTor inhibitor, for a reirradiation of metastasis invading left axillary, infraclavicular and supraclavicular lymph nodes in progression despite several lines of chemotherapy. After 6 months of follow-up, this association provided a satisfactory anti-tumor efficiency and tolerance. Nevertheless, clinical trials are needed in order to confirm this strategy for the treatment of gastric cancer metastasis.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Esophagogastric Junction , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/diagnostic imaging , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Everolimus , Humans , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Radionuclide Imaging , Retreatment , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Failure
18.
Prog Urol ; 24(6): 334-45, 2014 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24821555

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Literature showed the impact of surgical margin status on prognosis after radical prostatectomy (mostly on biochemical survival). Margin status is an easy self-evaluation of surgical practice to assess. The aim of this paper was to define what a positive surgical margin (PSM) is and how to prevent the occurrence, to precise the impact on survival and how to treat. METHOD: A literature analysis with Pubmed has been performed to 2012, furthermore conclusions of the main congresses with selection committee and review publication have also been studied. RESULTS: PSM is defined as "tumor cells touching the ink on the specimen edge". The most frequent reported incidence is between 15 to 20%. Margin status remains one of the major criteria to determine the need of adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. Quality of life is not or only lightly modified by radiotherapy with the current techniques. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves biological survival but is synonymous with overtreatment in many times. Salvage radiotherapy has to be quickly performed after Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse (PSA<1 ng/mL even<0.5 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: This literature review did not allow to suggest superiority of one surgical technique over another. In the same way, the kind of dissection i.e. bladder neck or neurovascular bundle preservation does no clearly modify PSM rate. However, it seems logical to "customize" dissection according to prostate cancer characteristics (D'Amico criteria for instance) guided with multiparametric MRI. Intrafascial dissection has to be applied only to low risk. Lastly, the debate between adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy is always ongoing.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Male , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
19.
Prog Urol ; 23(15): 1258-64, 2013 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24183084

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe drugs used in the non-hormonal treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. MATERIAL: Bibliographical search was performed from the database Medline (National Library of Medicine, PubMed) and websites of the HAS and the ANSM. The search was focused on the characteristics, the mode of action, the efficiency and the side effects of the various drugs concerned. RESULTS: The metabolic radiotherapy although under-used for this indication, kept a place at the beginning of the disease. Radium-223 chloride seems to have to occupy an important place in the coming years. The chemotherapy, the only recourse until very recently in the castration-resistant prostate cancer, must redefine its place partially. The denosumab provide an interesting alternative to bisphosphonates. CONCLUSION: The non-hormonal treatment of the metastatic disease of the prostate cancer is changing rapidly with the emergence of new molecules. Urologist must know perfectly these new drugs.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/economics , Cisplatin/pharmacology , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Denosumab , Docetaxel , Etoposide/economics , Etoposide/pharmacology , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Mitoxantrone/economics , Mitoxantrone/pharmacology , Mitoxantrone/therapeutic use , Organometallic Compounds/economics , Organometallic Compounds/pharmacology , Organometallic Compounds/therapeutic use , Organophosphorus Compounds/economics , Organophosphorus Compounds/pharmacology , Organophosphorus Compounds/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/etiology , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , RANK Ligand/antagonists & inhibitors , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioisotopes/economics , Radioisotopes/pharmacology , Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Radium/economics , Radium/pharmacology , Radium/therapeutic use , Strontium/economics , Strontium/pharmacology , Strontium/therapeutic use , Strontium Radioisotopes/economics , Strontium Radioisotopes/pharmacology , Strontium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Taxoids/economics , Taxoids/pharmacology , Taxoids/therapeutic use
20.
Prog Urol ; 23(6): 378-85, 2013 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23628094

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To summarize the indications and outcomes of low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy with permanent implants. METHODS: Bibliographic database PubMed was searched with prostate cancer and brachytherapy as keywords from 1995 to 2012. RESULTS: The main indication of prostate brachytherapy is the favorable group, but it could be proposed to patients with an intermediate prognostic group if the PSA is ≤ 15 ng/mL or if the Gleason score is 7 (3+4), under cover of a prostate MRI without any extra-capsular extension. Oncologic results are similar to those of surgery or external beam irradiation (EBRT), with a 10-yr biochemical control rate approaching 90%. Urinary toxicity is common during the year following the implant, mainly irritative symptoms; 5 to 15% of patients experienced acute urinary retention. A prostate volume higher than 50 cc or an initial high international prostatic symptom score (IPSS) are predictive of toxicity and are recognized as relative contraindications of the technique. Sexual activity is maintained in 60% of patients. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy must be proposed as a validated option beside active surveillance, surgery and EBRT.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...