Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Adv Ther ; 41(6): 2460-2476, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709395

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Studies have reported health-related quality-of-life impacts of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD); however, further research is needed to understand how those with DMD experience their condition and how psychosocial impacts evolve over time in response to disease progression. This qualitative study explores the social and emotional implications of key transitions, challenges and adaptations throughout the disease course from the perspective of patients and family caregivers. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with men and boys with DMD, and/or their caregivers, in the USA. Thematic analysis was used to examine patterns in data collected across the interviews. RESULTS: Nineteen participants were included. Three major themes were identified: (1) barriers to participation are multifaceted; (2) an emotional journey shaped by 'inevitable progression;' (3) family provides critical tangible and emotional support. This study illustrates that psychosocial impacts of DMD are shaped by knowledge of the condition's natural history alongside other factors including the extent of social barriers, personal growth and adaptation, and family support. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide insight into the strength and resilience with which individuals and their families respond to daily challenges and major clinical milestones and highlight the relative importance of loss of upper limb function as a transition in DMD affecting health-related quality-of-life.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Caregivers , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life , Humans , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/psychology , Male , Quality of Life/psychology , Child , Adolescent , Caregivers/psychology , Adult , Social Support , Young Adult , Disease Progression , Female , Middle Aged
2.
Adv Ther ; 41(4): 1401-1418, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349560

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Biologic therapies have demonstrated benefits for individuals with severe asthma, including reduced daily symptoms and severe exacerbations. However, data describing patient perspectives on these treatments are limited. This study sought to understand the preferences and priorities of Canadians with severe asthma in the context of novel biologic treatment options. METHODS: Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted among Canadians with severe asthma from July to August 2022. Purposeful sampling included individuals with and without biologic therapy experience. All participants described daily life with severe asthma, experiences and priorities related to asthma treatment and their impressions of biologics. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to explore patterns in the data. RESULTS: Among 18 individuals included, 10 were currently taking or had prior experience with biologic treatment for asthma. Those who had never been treated with biologics were unfamiliar with them, considering treatment, or believed that they may not be eligible. Four themes were developed to convey the perspectives of participants on biologics: (1) life-changing benefits, but not for all; (2) navigating barriers to being prescribed and remaining adherent to biologic treatments; (3) treatment administration preferences are not only about convenience; (4) concerns about safety and the unknown as a source of treatment hesitancy. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the clinical benefits of biologics align with patient perceptions of achieving good asthma control. However, treatment gaps persist among individuals who do not experience a meaningful improvement in their asthma symptoms and those who face barriers accessing biologics. People with severe asthma attributed importance to greater availability of at-home treatment options, improved access to financial support to cover treatment costs and support to address safety concerns. This research provides insight into patient-based treatment priorities and preferences for biologics, which may help inform decision-making related to emerging therapies for severe asthma.


For people with severe asthma, biologics are a treatment option that can be taken in addition to their regular medication. In this study, we asked 18 Canadians with severe asthma about how having severe asthma affects their lives, their current and previous asthma treatments, and their views on biologics. Ten people in this study were currently taking or had previously taken biologics for severe asthma. We found that biologics can be life changing. Also, people with severe asthma can find it difficult to get on and stay on biologics. They would like financial and educational support when considering biologics and prefer to take biologics at home, if possible. This study helps us understand the priorities and preferences related to biologics of patients with severe asthma.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Biological Products , North American People , Humans , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Canada , Asthma/drug therapy , Biological Therapy
3.
J Patient Rep Outcomes ; 7(1): 132, 2023 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38100005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The progression of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is characterized by loss of ambulation, respiratory insufficiency, cardiomyopathy, and early mortality. DMD profoundly impacts health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). However, few health state utility data exist; published utilities tend to be derived from small samples for a limited number of health states and are often based on caregiver-reported patient health status. This study estimated utility values for varied clinical and functional health states in DMD, based on patient-reported health status. METHODS: Individuals with DMD in the US aged 12-40 years completed the EQ-5D (5-level) and Health Utilities Index (HUI) preference-based instruments. Based on responses to a clinical questionnaire, participants self-classified into functional health states according to level of lower and upper limb function, use of respiratory support, and presence of cardiomyopathy. Mean [standard deviation (SD)] utility and EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were estimated according to health state; and median (interquartile range) attribute levels calculated to understand which domains of health are most severely affected in DMD. RESULTS: Of 63 males with DMD, mean (SD) age was 19.8 (6.1) years and 11 (17.5%) were ambulatory. Mean (SD) utility values were 0.92 (0.08; HUI2), 0.84 (0.20; HUI3), and 0.84 (0.13; EQ-5D) for ambulatory patients without cardiomyopathy (n = 10). For non-ambulatory patients with moderately impaired upper limb function, night and daytime ventilation without cardiomyopathy, mean (SD) utilities were 0.49 (0.07) for the HUI2, 0.16 (0.15) for the HUI3 and 025 (0.14) for the EQ-5D. Mean (SD) VAS scores for the same health states were 91 (9) and 83 (21), respectively. In addition to impairments in mobility/ambulation, and self-care, attributes like usual activities and pain also showed notable effects of DMD. CONCLUSIONS: In DMD, although a relationship between disease progression and HRQoL is observed, there is large variability in utility within functional health states, and across instruments. Utility values for less severe non-ambulatory health states described by level of upper limb function are novel. These utility values, derived based on direct patient feedback rather than from caregiver report, are relevant to individuals of varying functional statuses and augment scarce DMD-specific utility data.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne , Male , Humans , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/therapy , Pain , Quality of Life , Respiration
4.
Patient ; 15(3): 307-316, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34643935

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In lung cancer trials, overall survival is a well-validated and widely used endpoint; yet, in the context of adjuvant or curative intent treatments, disease-free survival (DFS) may be a better indicator of transformative patient outcomes. Although use of DFS is growing, patient perceptions of its relevance have not been established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to understand the importance of DFS as a trial endpoint, from the perspective of survivors of lung cancer. METHODS: Web-based qualitative interviews were conducted with Canadian survivors of stage Ib-IIIa lung cancer. Participants described their experiences of cancer diagnosis and treatment, including their treatment goals and priorities. Participants then provided their perspectives on DFS and overall survival, and how well each aligned with their treatment priorities. Thematic analysis was used to explore patterns in responses. RESULTS: Among the 18 participants (mean age, 64 years), 83% were female, most (89%) had received surgery, and 56% received chemotherapy. Most participants viewed DFS as an intrinsically meaningful treatment outcome, for reasons such as alignment with treatment goals, and the perception that DFS would help maintain a high quality of life. One individual was interested in DFS only as a potential surrogate for overall survival. Participants desired access to new treatments that improve DFS and emphasized this within the context of promoting patient agency in treatment decision making. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest DFS is a meaningful endpoint from the perspective of survivors of lung cancer; and may help inform decisions regarding regulatory approval and reimbursement of new treatments based on DFS data.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Canada , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Survivors
5.
BMJ Open ; 10(5): e033649, 2020 05 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32404387

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV/AIDS (STOP HIV/AIDS) Program Evaluation (SHAPE) study is a longitudinal cohort developed to monitor the progress of an HIV testing and treatment expansion programme across the province of British Columbia (BC). The study considers how sociostructural determinants such as gender, age, sexual identity, geography, income and ethnicity influence engagement in HIV care. PARTICIPANTS: Between January 2016 and September 2018, 644 BC residents who were at least 19 years old and diagnosed with HIV were enrolled in the study and completed a baseline survey. Participants will complete two additional follow-up surveys (18 months apart) about their HIV care experiences, with clinical follow-up ongoing. FINDINGS TO DATE: Analyses on baseline data have found high levels of HIV care engagement and treatment success among SHAPE participants, with 95% of participants receiving antiretroviral therapy and 90% having achieved viral suppression. However, persistent disparities in HIV treatment outcomes related to age, injection drug use and housing stability have been identified and require further attention when delivering services to marginalised groups. FUTURE PLANS: Our research will examine how engagement in HIV care evolves over time, continuing to identify barriers and facilitators for promoting equitable access to treatment and care among people living with HIV. A qualitative research project, currently in the formative phase, will compliment quantitative analyses by taking a strengths-based approach to exploring experiences of engagement and re-engagement in HIV treatment among individuals who have experienced delayed treatment initiation or treatment interruptions.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/methods , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Program Evaluation/methods , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/epidemiology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/virology , Adult , Aftercare , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/statistics & numerical data , British Columbia/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Ethnicity , Female , HIV/drug effects , HIV/isolation & purification , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/virology , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
6.
AIDS Care ; 31(7): 885-892, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30466303

ABSTRACT

We examined correlates of late and delayed initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in British Columbia, Canada. From December 2013 to December 2015 we recruited treatment-naïve people living with HIV who initiated ART within the previous year. 'Late initiation' was defined as CD4 cell count ≤500 cells/µL at ART initiation and 'delayed initiation' as ≥1 year between HIV diagnosis and initiation. Multivariable logistic regression assessed independent correlates of late and delayed initiation. Of 87 participants, 44 (51%) initiated late and 22 (26%) delayed initiation. Delayed initiation was positively associated with older age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.06 per year, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.01-1.12) and inversely associated with wanting to start ART at diagnosis (AOR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02-0.21). Variables associated with late initiation were older age (AOR: 1.09 per year, 95% CI: 1.03-1.15) and medical reason(s) for initiation (AOR: 5.00, 95% CI: 1.41-17.86). Late initiation was less likely among those with greater perceived ART efficacy (AOR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.98) and history of incarceration (AOR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03-0.56). Disparities in timing of initiation were observed for age, perceived ART efficacy, and history of incarceration. Enhanced health services that address these factors may facilitate earlier treatment initiation.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , CD4 Lymphocyte Count/statistics & numerical data , Delayed Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Time-to-Treatment , Adult , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , British Columbia , Cohort Studies , Female , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/immunology , Humans , Male , Marital Status , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
7.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 20(4): 920-925, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28660392

ABSTRACT

The BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre's Newcomer Women's Health Clinic (NWHC) opened in 2014 to fill a gap in services for newcomer women to Canada residing in Metro Vancouver. After 1 year the NWHC was operating at only 50% capacity. An evaluation was conducted to better understand the underutilization of clinic services. Evaluation data was collected via patient intake forms, patient feedback surveys, and one-to-one interviews with both newcomer women and service providers who work with newcomer women. Results highlight the heterogeneity in newcomer women's experiences including different perceptions of health, health needs, and health-seeking behaviours. Despite the population's diversity, some common experiences exist, including difficulties navigating and accessing a new health system and lack of awareness of the NWHC. Findings provide insight for improving the delivery of NWHC services, and contribute to a rich and ongoing dialogue concerning the diversity of experiences of newcomer women in Canada.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Women's Health Services/organization & administration , Adult , British Columbia , Female , Health Status , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Navigation , Program Evaluation , Women's Health , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL