Left ventricular assist device explantation using a new double-patch technique†.

OBJECTIVES: There are several surgical approaches for explanting a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) after recovery of cardiac function. Thus, remaining ventricular assist device components may bear significant risks of infection or thrombosis. We hereby report our technique and two-center experience with explantation of LVADs using a new double-patch technique. METHODS: From March 2019 to April 2021, five patients underwent LVAD explantation after myocardial recovery (HVAD, n = 2; HeartMate 3, n = 3). The mean patient age was 50.3 years (100% male); the mean time on the LVAD was 23.1 ± 20.8 months. The aetiology of the primary heart failure was dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 4) and myocarditis (n = 1).LVAD explantation was performed using a median sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. The LVAD was stopped, and the outflow graft was clamped. The outflow graft was ligated and sutured close to the aortic anastomosis. The driveline was clipped and removed. Under induced fibrillation, the attachment of the LVAD was released from the apical cuff and the LVAD was removed. A round pericardial patch was fixed from the inner of the ventricle. This step sealed the apex of the heart. An additional Gore-Tex patch was continuously sutured epicardially over the suture ring. RESULTS: The 5 cases showed technically uncomplicated explantation of the LVADs. During the follow-up of a mean of 16.4 ± 16.9 months, we observed 100% survival. There were no bleeding complications or thromboembolic events during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: LVAD explantation with the double-patch technique is feasible and safe. This technique allows discontinuation of anticoagulation. The 30-day survival was 100%. Further studies are needed to provide better evidence for LVAD explantation and long-term follow-up.

Procedural outcomes of the 34 mm EvolutR Transcatheter valve in a real-world population insights from the HORSE multicenter collaborative registry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of real-world patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the 34 mm Evolut R (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). BACKGROUND: Larger aortic annulus has been associated with increased incidence of paravalvular leaks (PVLs) after TAVR. However, little is known, so far, about the performance of the 34 mm Evolut R in this setting. METHODS: From the multicenter, international, retrospective Horizontal Aorta in Transcatheter Self-expanding Valves (HORSE) registry, including patients who underwent TAVR for native severe AS, we selected patients treated with the 34 mm Evolut R evaluating procedural characteristics and VARC-2 defined device success. We also compared 34 mm Evolut R with other Evolut R sizes. RESULTS: Among the 4434 patients included in the registry, 572 (13%) received the 34 mm Evolut R valve. Mean age was 80.8 ± 6.5 years and the median STS PROM score was 4 [interquartile range 2-6]. Device success was achieved in 87.4% with 7.7% of PVLs; moreover, the rate of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) was 22.4%. Patients who underwent 34 mm Evolut R implantation experienced more in-hospital permanent pacemaker implantation (22.4% vs. 15%; p < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, 34 mm Evolut R did not affect device success (OR: 0.81 [0.60-1.09]; p = 0.151). Device success was consistent with other THVs sizes (87.4% vs. 89.6%; p = 0.157). CONCLUSIONS: THV replacement in patients requiring 34 mm Evolut R has an acceptable performance. Compared to other Medtronic sizes it demonstrated to be comparable in terms of device success, despite an increased rate of pacemaker implantation.

Stroke events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Temporal relationships and affected brain regions.

BACKGROUND: Despite continuous improvements in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), periprocedural strokes remain a devastating complication. Randomized controlled trials failed to demonstrate a reduction in clinically apparent strokes or mortality after TAVI due to cerebral embolic protection (CEP). To identify potential targets of CEP strategies during TAVI, we evaluated affected brain regions, and temporal patterns of stroke onset in a routine clinical sample. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 3,164 consecutive patients treated with TAVI from 2008 to 2019 at a single center were screened for cerebrovascular events. Affected cerebral regions were determined according to clinical symptoms and brain imaging. Rates of disabling stroke and non-disabling stroke at 30 days were 2.2% and 1.4%, respectively. The frequency of all strokes decreased from 5.0% to 3.0% over time (P = .012). Patients with impaired left-ventricular function (OR 2.19), increased CHA2DS2-VASc (OR 1.39) and moderate/severe spontaneous echo contrast (OR 3.60) had a higher stroke risk. Acute symptom onset occurred during TAVI (19.4%), within 24 hours (40.3%) or later (25.0%); 98.3% of strokes were of ischemic origin. In intraprocedural strokes, 53.2% of lesions were found in locations considered protected by current CEP devices, and 37.5% of patients with intraprocedural strokes were exclusively affected in these areas. Baseline or procedural parameters were not associated with embolic distribution patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Most strokes occurred early after TAVI - but not necessarily during the procedure - and affected multiple brain regions only partially protected by current CEP devices. Efficient prevention of cerebrovascular events may require strategies beyond the TAVI procedure to minimize stroke risk and additional randomized controlled trials will be required to clarify the role of CEP in efficient stroke prevention during TAVI.

Horizontal Aorta in Transcatheter Self-Expanding Valves: Insights From the HORSE International Multicentre Registry.

[Figure: see text].

Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Horizontal aorta (HA) is an anatomical feature that can pose significant technical challenges for the successful positioning of the bioprosthetic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Physiological range of aortic angle (AA) is unknown; hence there is no cutoff AA for classifying HA. Moreover, patient characteristics predicting HA are under-investigated. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 16 heart valve centers in Europe. The study utilized a common dataset with a priori agreed-upon definitions and variables. Eligible patients underwent TAVR between 2014 and 2020 and had multidetector computed tomographic imaging data available for determining the AA. The analysis described the distribution of AA and potential predictors of HA. Inter-center variability was also explored. RESULTS: For 4022 patients analyzed, the mean AA ± standard deviation was 49.4° ± 9.4° (median 49°, inter-quartile range [IQR] 12°, range 18-90°). There was no significant difference in mean AA between men and women (49.4° ± 9.1° vs. 49.6° ± 9.3°, respectively; p = 0.53); therefore, 49.4° was accepted as the cutoff value for HA in subsequent analyses. Covariates significantly associated with HA included age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.04, p < 0.001), body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05-1.08, p < 0.01), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45-0.75, p < 0.001), and porcelain aorta (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52-0.85, p = 0.001). Some inter-center variability was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We defined 49.4° as the mean AA, and also associated predictors of HA in a large case series of patients with severe aortic stenosis candidates for TAVR.

Outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation with and without bioprosthetic valve fracture.

BACKGROUND: Bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) is a technique to reduce gradients in valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (VIV-TAVI) procedures. The outcome of VIV-TAVI with BVF has not been compared with VIV-TAVI without BVF. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of VIV-TAVI with BVF compared to VIV-TAVI without BVF. METHODS: In total, 81 cases of BVF VIV-TAVI (BVF group) from 14 centres were compared to 79 cases of VIV-TAVI without BVF (control group). RESULTS: VARC-2-defined device success was 93% in the BVF group and 68.4% in the control group (p<0.001). The mean transvalvular gradient decreased from 37±13 mmHg to 10.8±5.9 mmHg (p<0.001) in the BVF group and from 35±16 mmHg to 15.8±6.8 mmHg (p<0.001) in the control group with a significantly higher final gradient in the control group (p<0.001). The transvalvular gradients did not change significantly over time. In-hospital major adverse events occurred in 3.7% in the BVF group and 7.6% in the control group (p=0.325). A linear mixed model identified BVF, self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (THVs) and other surgical aortic valve (SAV) types other than Mitroflow as predictors of lower transvalvular gradients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to VIV-TAVI alone, VIV-TAVI with BVF resulted in a significantly lower transvalvular gradient acutely and at follow-up. Independent predictors of lower gradients were the use of self-expanding THVs and the treatment of SAVs other than Mitroflow, irrespective of BVF performance. BVF significantly reduced the gradient independently from transcatheter or surgical valve type.

Spontaneous echo contrast, left atrial appendage thrombus and stroke in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: The relevance of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) and left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of SEC and LAAT and evaluate the impact on periprocedural outcome after TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2,549 consecutive patients underwent TAVI between 2008 and 2017. After exclusion of cases with insufficient imaging, concomitant procedures or severe intraprocedural complications, 1,558 cases were analysed. Three groups were defined according to (pre)thrombotic formations - moderate or severe SEC (n=89), LAAT (n=53), and reference (n=1,416). The primary outcome was disabling ischaemic stroke within 24 hours. The prevalence was 4.4% for LAAT and 5.4% for moderate/severe SEC. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with moderate/severe SEC (6.8%) compared to the reference (2.1%) and LAAT (1.9%) groups (p=0.020). SEC was identified as an independent risk factor for the primary outcome (OR 3.54 [95% CI: 1.30-9.61], p=0.013). LAAT was associated with an impaired unadjusted one-year survival (43.4%) compared to the SEC (27.3%) and reference groups (18.7%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SEC and LAAT were detected in a relevant number of patients undergoing TAVI. SEC may represent an important risk factor for intraprocedural stroke; increased mortality was observed in patients with LAAT.