Anesthesia and Critical Care for the Prediction and Prevention for Small-for-size Syndrome: Guidelines from the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference.

BACKGROUND: During the perioperative period of living donor liver transplantation, anesthesiologists and intensivists may encounter patients in receipt of small grafts that puts them at risk of developing small for size syndrome (SFSS). METHODS: A scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on aspects of SFSS with proposed recommendations. Recommendations underwent a blinded review by an independent expert panel and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at a consensus conference organized by the International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplantation Society of India. RESULTS: It was determined that centers with experience in living donor liver transplantation should utilize potential small for size grafts. Higher risk recipients with sarcopenia, cardiopulmonary, and renal dysfunction should receive small for size grafts with caution. In the intraoperative phase, a restrictive fluid strategy should be considered along with routine use of cardiac output monitoring, as well as use of pharmacologic portal flow modulation when appropriate. Postoperatively, these patients can be considered for enhanced recovery and should receive proactive monitoring for SFSS, nutrition optimization, infection prevention, and consideration for early renal replacement therapy for avoidance of graft congestion. CONCLUSIONS: Our recommendations provide a framework for the optimal anesthetic and critical care management in the perioperative period for patients with grafts that put them at risk of developing SFSS. There is a significant limitation in the level of evidence for most recommendations. This statement aims to provide guidance for future research in the perioperative management of SFSS.

International Liver Transplantation Society/Society for Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia Consensus Statement on Essential Attributes of a Liver Transplant Anesthesiologist.

BACKGROUND: We sought to establish consensus on the essential skills, knowledge, and attributes that a liver transplant (LT) anesthesiologist should possess in a bid to help guide the further training process. METHODS: Consensus was achieved via a modified Delphi methodology, surveying 15 identified international experts in the fields of LT anesthesia and critical care. RESULTS: Key competencies were identified in preoperative management and optimization of a potential LT recipient; intraoperative management, including hemodynamic monitoring; coagulation and potential crisis management; and postoperative intensive and enhanced recovery care. CONCLUSIONS: This article provides an essential guide to competency-based training of an LT anesthesiologist.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in a Cohort of Recipients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.

Background: Data on feasibility, management, and outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) in patients with pre-existing left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), severe coronary artery disease (CAD) or cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) is scarce. Methods: We reviewed outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in recipients with LVSD (ejection fraction [EF] < 50%) from our series of 1946 LDLT's performed between July 2010 and July 2018. Results: LVSD was detected in 12 male patients with a mean age, BMI and MELD of 52 ± 9 years, 25 ± 5 kg/m2, and 19 ± 4 respectively. Out of these, 6 patients had CAD (2 with previous coronary artery bypass graft, 1 following recent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 2 post myocardial infarction, 1 noncritical CAD), and 6 had CCM. The EF ranged from 25% to 45%. Ethanol was the predominant underlying etiology for cirrhosis (50%). During LDLT, 2 patients developed ventricular ectopic rhythm and were managed successfully with intravenous lidocaine. Stress cardiomyopathy manifested in 3 patients post operatively with decreased EF, of which 2 improved, while 1 needed IABP support and succumbed to multiorgan failure on 8th postoperative day (POD). Another patient died on POD30 due to septic shock. Both these patients had higher MELD scores (actual MELD), extremes of BMI (17.3and 35.8 kg/m2) and were diabetic. There were no long-term cardiac deaths. The 1-year, and 5-year survival were 75%, and 66%, respectively. Conclusion: Among potential LT recipients with LVSD, those with stable CAD and good performance status, and well optimized CCM patients may be considered for LDLT after careful risk stratification in experienced centers.

Optimal anesthetic conduct regarding immediate and short-term outcomes after liver transplantation - Systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations.

BACKGROUND: In the era of enhanced recovery after surgery, there is significant discussion regarding the impact of intraoperative anesthetic management on short-term outcomes following liver transplantation (LT), with no clear consensus in the literature. OBJECTIVES: To identify whether or not intraoperative anesthetic management affects short-term outcomes after liver transplantation. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was undertaken. The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021239758). An international expert panel made recommendations for clinical practice using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: After screening, 14 studies were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. Six were prospective randomized clinical trials, three were prospective nonrandomized clinical trials, and five were retrospective studies. These manuscripts were reviewed to look at five questions regarding anesthetic care and its impact on short term outcomes following liver transplant. After review of the literature, the quality of evidence according to the following outcomes was as follows: intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality (low), early allograft dysfunction (low), and hospital and ICU length of stay (moderate). CONCLUSIONS: For optimal short term outcomes after liver transplantation, the panel recommends the use of volatile anesthetics in preference to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) (Level of Evidence: Very low; Strength of Recommendation: Weak) and minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) versus bispectral index (BIS) for depth of anesthesia monitoring (Level of Evidence: Very low; Strength of Recommendation: Weak). Regarding ventilation and oxygenation, the panel recommends a restrictive oxygenation strategy targeting a PaO2 of 70-120 mmHg (10-14 kPa), a tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg ideal body weight (IBW), administration of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) tailored to patient intraoperative physiology, and recruitment maneuvers. (Level of evidence: Very low; Strength of Recommendation: Strong). Finally, the panel recommends the routine use of antiemetic prophylaxis. (Level of evidence: low; Strength of Recommendation: Strong).

Fast tracking in adult living donor liver transplantation: A case series of 15 patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fast tracking (FT) for more efficacious use of resources may be difficult after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to a partial liver graft, complex vascular anastomoses and longer operating time. Our study was aimed at reporting our experience with FT (on table extubation) in LDLT recipients. A secondary objective of our study was to look at defining a subgroup of patients who could be prospectively planned for FT. METHODS: We studied the demographics and outcomes of 15 LDLT recipients extubated immediately in the operating suite based on an uneventful intraoperative course, haemodynamic stability after graft reperfusion and improvement of metabolic parameters post-implantation and vascular anastomoses. RESULTS: Twelve recipients were males, and mean age, body mass index (BMI) and Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score were 43 ± 12 years, 23 ± 3 kg/m2 and 15.5 ± 6, respectively, most were Child-Turcotte-Pugh Class B. Diabetes and hypothyroidism were present in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. Post-extubation, none required immediate re-intubation and one patient needed non-invasive ventilation for 2 h. CONCLUSION: Fast tracked recipients were young, with a low BMI, low MELD scores, minimal comorbidities and good immediate graft function post-reperfusion.