Bilateral Thoracic Cytoreductive Surgery for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei of Appendiceal Origin.

Pleural spread occurs in pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) in less than 10% of the patients and is treated by thoracic cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITOC). It is performed both for symptom palliation and disease control and includes pleurectomy and decortication and wedge and segmental lung resections. So far, only unilateral spread treated with a thoracic cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been reported in literature. We report a patient with bilateral thoracic PMP following a complete abdominal CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) who was treated with bilateral staged thoracic CRS and subsequently had a 4th CRS for abdominal disease. The staged procedure was performed as she was symptomatic due to the thoracic disease and there was disease on all pleural surfaces. HITOC was not performed. Both procedures were uneventful with no major morbidity. The patient is currently disease free nearly 84 months after the first abdominal CRS and 60 months after the second thoracic CRS. Thus, an aggressive CRS in the thorax in patients with PMP can result in a prolongation of survival while preserving the quality of life if the abdominal disease is controlled. A thorough understanding of the disease biology and surgical expertise are both essential for selecting the right patients for these complex procedures and achieving good short- and long-term outcomes.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been questioned in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with/without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies. This survey was performed to study clinicians' practice about ERAS in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC. METHODS: An online survey, comprising 76 questions on elements of prehabilitation (n=11), preoperative (n=8), intraoperative (n=16) and postoperative (n=32) management, was conducted. The respondents included surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical care specialists. RESULTS: The response rate was 66% (136/206 clinicians contacted). Ninety-one percent of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices. There was encouraging adherence to implement the prehabilitation (76-95%), preoperative (50-94%), and intraoperative (55-90%) ERAS practices. Mechanical bowel preparation was being used by 84.5%. Intra-abdominal drains usage was 94.7%, intercostal drains by 77.9% respondents. Nasogastric drainage was used by 84% of practitioners. The average hospital stay was 10 days as reported by 50% of respondents. A working protocol and ERAS checklist have been designed, based on the results of our study, following recent ERAS-CRS-HIPEC guidelines. This protocol will be prospectively validated. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents were implementing ERAS practices for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, though as an extrapolation of colorectal and gynecological guidelines. The adoption of postoperative practices was relatively low compared to other perioperative practices.

Society of Onco-Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care consensus guidelines for perioperative management of patients for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC).

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for primary peritoneal malignancies or peritoneal spread of malignant neoplasm is being done at many centres worldwide. Perioperative management is challenging with varied haemodynamic and temperature instabilities, and the literature is scarce in many aspects of its perioperative management. There is a need to have coalition of the existing evidence and experts' consensus opinion for better perioperative management. The purpose of this consensus practice guideline is to provide consensus for best practice pattern based on the best available evidence by the expert committee of the Society of Onco-Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care comprising perioperative physicians for better perioperative management of patients of CRS-HIPEC.

Epidural Hematoma: Vigilance beyond Guidelines.

Coagulopathy either from the use of anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or thrombolytic medications or from underlying medical conditions is considered one of the major risk factors for epidural hematoma formation related to epidural catheter placement or removal. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) has laid down guidelines regarding timing of neuraxial blockade or removal of neuraxial catheters in patients receiving either antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy. We present a case of acute onset of paraplegia because of an epidural hematoma following removal of the epidural catheter in a patient who was given the first dose of antithrombotic therapy after the removal of the epidural catheter as per the ASRA guidelines. The epidural hematoma was diagnosed with an urgent magnetic resonance imaging, and the patient was urgently taken up for surgical evacuation of the hematoma. The patient made full recovery over 1 week period.

Outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin from two Indian centers: A preliminary five-year experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) of appendiceal origin treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at two tertiary Indian centers. METHODS: Data was prospectively collected from January 2011 to January 2016. Palliative procedures were excluded. HIPEC was performed by the coliseum technique using either a mitomycin or oxaliplatin-based regimen. RESULTS: 77 procedures were performed on 71 patients. The average time interval between diagnosis and CRS was 15.3 months. Of the tumors, 22.1% were high grade, 77.9% low grade and 24.6% intermediate grade. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 26 (<25 in 70.1% and >30 in 38.9%). Completeness of cytoreduction score (CCS)-1 was achieved in 75.3% (CC-0 in 42.9%). The mean number of bowel anastomoses was 1.1 and the mean number of organs resected per patient was 3.3. Of the 77 patients, 71% had resection of 3 or more organs and 50.6% had resection of 4 or more organs. Grade 3-4 complications occurred in 42.9% of the patients and the perioperative mortality was 5.2%. The projected 5-year overall survival (OS) was 62.3% and the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 71% at a median follow up of 13 months. CONCLUSION: CRS and HIPEC can be used to treat PMP with an acceptable morbidity and mortality in Indian patients. Lack of early referrals leads to a large portion of patients presenting with extensive disease and an inferior survival which should improve with increasing awareness about the procedure and its results.

Anesthesia considerations in large-volume lipoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Large-volume lipoplasty is becoming more common and has been proven to be safe and effective. Large-volume lipoplasty is normally performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Techniques of general anesthesia and fluid management are important factors in improving the safety of large-volume lipoplasty. OBJECTIVE: Certain important considerations in anesthesia and perioperative management can improve outcomes in large-volume lipoplasty. Our objective is to present our protocol and technique for general anesthesia in large-volume lipoplasty METHODS: Large-volume lipoplasty (5 to 18.5 L) was performed on 32 patients under general endotracheal anesthesia. Important considerations included proper selection of patients, low flow of anesthesia gases, prevention of hypothermia, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, intraoperative fluid ratio of 1, Foley catheter to monitor urine output, and postoperative overnight or longer monitoring in a well-equipped hospital. Maintaining the endotracheal cuff pressure between 20 to 30 mm of water helped to reduce incidence of sore throat. Addition of lidocaine in wetting solution helped to reduce requirement of general anesthetic agents and as a result, postoperative recovery was faster and more pleasant. RESULTS: Major complications did not occur in any patients. Minor complications encountered were nausea, vomiting, and shivering and occurred in about 25% of patients. All patients were able to walk without support 4 hours after surgery. In spite of minor complications, all patients reported the postoperative recovery to be better than expected. CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia for large-volume lipoplasty is safe. Postoperative recovery can be made faster and more pleasant by following these recommendations.