Removal of an Epidural Catheter in a Patient Receiving Ticagrelor: A Case Report.

We report a case of a patient who had a coronary angioplasty and received heparin, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor on the evening of bilateral total knee arthroplasties performed under combined spinal epidural anesthesia. After a multidisciplinary meeting, the epidural catheter was removed 5 days after the dose of clopidogrel. With the catheter still in place, ticagrelor was continued to prevent stent thrombosis. Removing an epidural catheter in a patient on antiplatelet therapy must be done after a risk-benefit assessment, multidisciplinary collaboration, and stringent neurologic monitoring. The focus should be on prevention of a spinal hematoma, and rapid diagnosis and treatment to optimize the neurologic outcome.

The Comparison Between Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube With Respect to Adequacy of Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia-A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study, and Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure. Most anesthesiologists advocate tracheal intubation. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is becoming a day care surgery, hence many anaesthesiologists have started using laryngeal masks to decrease airway manipulation seen with conventional laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation and avoid hemodynamic pressor responses and postoperative sore throat. The Supreme laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is an innovative, sterile, single use, supraglottic airway management device which provides access to and functional separation of the respiratory and digestive tracts. In this study, there are two objectives-(1) primary objective: to assess the adequacy of ventilation when using LMA-Supreme^(TM) (LMA-S) and endotracheal tube (ETT), and (2) secondary objective: the first is to give the time for achieving effective airway and number of attempts for securing airway. The second is to assess haemodynamic parameters (heart rate and blood pressure). The last is to show the incidence of gastric distension, regurgitation and postoperative sore throat. METHODS: A total of 132 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients were randomly assigned to LMA-S and ETT for intraoperative ventilation. After induction of general anaesthesia, the device was inserted, correct placement was checked, and parameters were recorded. SPSS version 20.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. A P-value less than 0.05 is statistically significant. RESULTS: Ventilatory parameters such as inspiratory and expiratory leak volumes, and peak airway pressure values were comparable between the groups throughout the entire time interval. The number of attempts for successful insertion were comparable, but the mean time required for achieving effective airway was significantly longer in ETT than LMA-S (25.2 ± 8.3 sec vs. 18.6 ± 5.1 sec, respectively [P ＜ 0.05]). There was no situation in which the patient from the LMA-S group had to be intubated. The haemodynamic responses to insertion, pneumoperitoneum inflation and deflation, and removal of the device were greater for the ETT than the LMA-S. There were no complications like gastric distension or regurgitation in either groups. The postoperative sore throat at 2 hours and 24 hours was significantly lower in group LMA-S than group ETT. CONCLUSIONS: Positive pressure ventilation with a correctly placed LMA-S allows adequate pulmonary ventilation, without the untoward hemodynamic and postoperative adverse effects of endotracheal intubation, in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.

Successful anesthetic management of a massive thoracoabdominal impalement injury.

We describe the management, focusing on the anesthetic preparedness, of a 44-year-old man who presented with impalement of a 1 m long serrated rod through the right supraclavicular fossa extending up to the right iliac fossa, along with rib fractures and laceration of the liver and diaphragm.