[Hoarding Behaviour in Three Different Types of Dementia Cases]. / Farkli Demansi Olan Üç Olguda Biriktirme Davranisi.

INTRODUCTION: Hoarding behaviour, which is generally defined as collecting and keeping unnecessary, cheap objects or things that can not be used, is more common in elderly than young people. The prevelance of hoarding behaviour in dementia was reported as 22%. In this paper, three different types of dementia cases are presented in order to emphasize the clinical awareness for hoarding disorder, which is common in the elderly, especially those with dementia. CASES: The first case is a patient with a diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia who was collecting old things before the appearance of bahavioural changes like verbal and physical agitation. The second one is a patient who was admitted with complaints of forgetting, diagnosed as having Alzheimer's Disease and presented with paper hoarding behavior in his clinical follow-up. The last patient was presented with visual hallucinations, forgetting, collecting old things and depressive symptoms. He received a diagnosis of Lewy body dementia. DISCUSSION: It is prominent that all three different dementia cases hoarding behavior at early stages of dementia. It should be kept in mind that hoarding behavior which begins at late life might be a sign of dementia or it might appear in the dementia process.

[Dimensions of Agitation Based on the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory in Patients with Dementia]. / Demans Hastalarinda Cohen-Mansfield Ajitasyon Envanteri ile Degerlendirilen Ajitasyon Boyutlarinin Arastirilmasi.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensions of agitation in dementia patients using the Turkish version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI-T). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 100 patients diagnosed as dementia, according to the DSM-IV-TR. The CMAI-T was administered to the patients' caregivers via face-to-face interviews. The Standardized Mini Mental State Examination (SMMSE) was used to assess cognitive functions. The severity of depression and the functional state of the patients were assessed using the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) and the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Principal component analysis and varimax rotation were used to determine the factor structure of the CMAI-T. RESULTS: Factor analysis of the CMAI-T indicated a 3-factor structure: physically aggressive agitation, verbal agitation, and physically non-aggressive agitation. In 92% of the patients there was ≥1 agitation behavior during the previous 2 weeks. The CMAI-T total and factor scores were negatively correlated with the SMMSE scores, and positively correlated with the CSDD and the FAQ scores. CONCLUSIONS: The CMAI-T yielded 3 factors (physically aggressive agitation, verbal agitation, and physically non-aggressive agitation), which indicated the scale had construct validity. Agitation behaviors were associated with cognitive dysfunction, symptoms of depression and general level of functioning. Additional research is necessary to identify the predictors of these dimensions in different dementia samples, and to determine the efficacy of therapeutic interventions.