Comparative Effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in Initially Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-based Study to Assess Subsequent Surgical Resection and Overall Survival.

AIMS: First-line FOLFIRINOX (FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, IRINotecan, and OXaliplatin) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been publicly funded for patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (uLAPC) in Ontario, Canada. We examined the overall survival and surgical resection rate after first-line FOLFIRINOX or GnP and determined the association between resection and overall survival in patients with uLAPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based study including patients with uLAPC who received first-line treatment FOLFIRINOX or GnP from April 2015 to March 2019. The cohort was linked to administrative databases to ascertain demographic and clinical characteristics. Propensity score methods were used to balance differences between FOLFIRINOX and GnP. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival. Cox regression was used to determine the association between receipt of treatment and overall survival, adjusting for time-dependent surgical resections. RESULTS: We identified 723 patients with uLAPC (mean age = 65.8, 43.5% female) who received FOLFIRINOX (55.2%) or GnP (44.8%). The median overall survival and 1-year overall survival probability were higher for FOLFIRINOX (13.7 months, 54.6%) than for GnP (8.7 months, 34.0%). Post-chemotherapy surgical resection occurred in 89 (12.3%) patients (FOLFIRINOX: 74 [18.5%] versus GnP: 15 [4.6%]), with no difference in survival since surgery between FOLFIRINOX and GnP (P = 0.29). After adjusting time-dependent post-treatment surgical resection, FOLFIRINOX (inverse probability treatment weighting hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.61, 0.84) was independently associated with improved overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world population-based study of patients with uLAPC, FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved survival and higher resection rates. FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved survival in patients with uLAPC after accounting for the effect of post-chemotherapy surgical resection, suggesting the benefit of FOLFIRINOX was not solely due to improving resectability.

Outcomes Following Treatment with FOLFOX for Patients with Resectable or Potentially Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Cohort Study.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to extrahepatic sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective study examining the safety and effectiveness of perioperative oxaliplatin for resectable or potentially resectable colorectal metastases in Ontario, Canada. Outcomes were also compared with patients with liver-only metastases. Patients received oxaliplatin for mCRC between 1 January 2013 and 30 June 2020. RESULTS: In total, 192 patients had extrahepatic metastases. Seventy per cent had R0 metastasectomy. The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 62% and 79%, respectively; <4% of patients died within 60 days of metastasectomy and 74-90% of patients received treatment according to recommendations from a multidisciplinary setting. Compared with liver-only controls (n = 1306), patients had mCRC to the lung only (n = 115), lung and liver (n = 55) and liver with non-pulmonary site (n = 22). Extrahepatic metastases were more likely to be found for patients whose primary colorectal resection had positive margins (14% versus 7%, P = 0.005) and primary tumours located in the rectum [odds ratio 4.01 (2.31-6.97)]. After adjustment, there was no difference in overall survival between liver-only controls and patients with lung-only [hazard ratio 0.82 (0.59-1.15)] or liver and lung metastases [hazard ratio 1.26 (0.85-1.87)] (P = 0.24). In total, 79/115 (69%) of patients with lung-only metastases had a metastasectomy compared with 645/1306 (49%) and 15/55 (27%) of patients with liver-only and liver and lung metastases, respectively. Hospital visits were similar between patients with liver-only and extrahepatic metastases. CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with resectable or potentially resectable mCRC with extrahepatic metastases was safe and resulted in similar outcomes in appropriately selected patients when compared with patients with liver-only metastases.

Medical oncology workload in Canada: infrastructure, supports, and delivery of clinical care.

Background: In 2000, a Canadian task force recommended that medical oncologists (mos) meet a target of 160-175 new patient consultations per year. Here, we report the Canadian results of a global survey of mo workload compared with mo workload in other high-income countries (hics). Methods: Using a snowball method, an online survey was distributed by national oncology societies to chemotherapy-prescribing physicians in 22 hics (World Bank criteria). The survey was distributed within Canada to all members of the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists. Workload was measured as the annual number of new cancer patient consults per oncologist. Results: The survey was completed by 782 oncologists from hics, including 58 from Canada. Median annual consults per mo were 175 in Canada compared with 125 in other hics. The proportions of mos having 100 or fewer consults or more than 300 consults per year were 3% (2/58) and 5% (3/58) in Canada compared with 31% (222/724) and 16% (116/724) in other hics (p < 0.001 and p = 0.023 respectively). The median number of patients seen in a full-day clinic was 15 in Canada and 25 in other hics (p = 0.220). Canadian mos reported spending a median of 55 minutes per new consultation; new consultations of 35 minutes were reported in other hics (p < 0.001). Median hours worked per week was 55 in Canada and 45 in other hics (p = 0.200). Conclusions: Although the median annual clinical volume for Canadian mos aligns with recommended targets, half the respondents exceeded that level of activity. Health policymakers and educators have to consider mo workforce supply and alternative models of care in preparation for the anticipated surge in cancer incidence in the coming decade.

Uptake and Effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: a Population-based Study.

AIMS: Although FOLFIRINOX is a standard treatment option for advanced pancreas cancer, there are few data describing utilisation and effectiveness in routine clinical practice. Here we report practice patterns and outcomes in the general population of Ontario, Canada. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Ontario Cancer Registry and New Drug Funding Program, we identified all patients with pancreas cancer treated with palliative intent gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX in Ontario during 2006-2014. FOLFIRINOX became available in Ontario's single-payer health system in November 2011. Gemcitabine cases were classified as pre-FOLFIRINOX era (2006-2010) or post-FOLFIRINOX era (2011-2014). Cases treated with perioperative chemotherapy were excluded. Comparisons of proportions between study groups were made using the chi-square test. Overall survival was measured from the date of chemotherapy initiation. RESULTS: During 2006-2014, 3826 patients in Ontario were treated with gemcitabine (n = 3042) or FOLFIRINOX (n = 784) chemotherapy for advanced pancreas cancer. Uptake of FOLFIRINOX increased from 41% (206/505) of treated cases in 2012 to 56% (274/486) of treated cases in 2014. The median overall survival of patients treated with gemcitabine was 5.0 months in 2006-2010 and 4.8 months in 2011-2014. The median overall survival of FOLFIRINOX patients treated in 2011-2014 was 8.2 months. CONCLUSION: The use of FOLFIRINOX in the general population has increased since 2011. Survival outcomes show a substantial efficacy-effectiveness gap between the pivotal Prodige 4/ACCORD 11 clinical trial and routine practice.

Shifting practice in definitive chemoradiation for localized esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of carboplatin-paclitaxel in the trimodality setting was demonstrated in the cross trial. Because of better tolerance, that regimen has been adopted as an alternative for patients receiving definitive chemoradiation (dcrt). The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes in patients with localized esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (gej) cancer who received dcrt using either platinum-5-fluorouracil (5fu) or carboplatin-paclitaxel. METHODS: Medical records and outcomes for all patients diagnosed with localized carcinoma of the esophagus and gej at our centre between 2008 and 2015 were reviewed. All patients who underwent dcrt using cisplatin-5fu, carboplatin-5fu, or carboplatin-paclitaxel were included. RESULTS: The 73 identified patients (34 cisplatin-5fu, 13 carboplatin-5fu, 26 carboplatin-paclitaxel) were all prescribed concomitant radiotherapy of 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions. The diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in 64% and squamous cell carcinoma in 36%. Median overall survival (os) duration for the cisplatin-5fu group was 28 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 19 to 41 months], with a 3-year os rate of 44%, in contrast to the 15 months (95% ci: 11 to 17 months) and 15% in the carboplatin-paclitaxel group (log-rank p = 0.0047). Median os duration for the carboplatin-5fu group was 17 months (95% ci: 11 to 68 months) with a 3-year os rate of 31%. Adjusting for patient and disease factors, better os durations and rates were associated with cisplatin-5fu (hazard ratio: 0.34; p = 0.0016) and carboplatin-5fu (hazard ratio: 0.55; p = 0.20) than with carboplatin-paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: In a dcrt regimen, a better os is associated with cisplatin-5fu than with carboplatin-paclitaxel. Clinical trials to determine optimal chemotherapy regimens are warranted for patients who are not suitable for surgery.

Phase I/II trial of dose-reduced capecitabine in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy is associated with improved outcomes in trials of selected fit patients with advanced colorectal cancer (acrc). For older or less-fit patients, combination chemotherapy is associated with greater toxicity and less benefit. Capecitabine monotherapy is a reasonable option for those patients, but the optimal dose remains controversial. METHODS: A multicentre phase i/ii trial of reduced-dose capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, days 1-14 every 21 days) was conducted in 221 patients representing one or more of the following subsets: age greater than 65 years (n = 167), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ecog) performance status of 1 or greater (n = 139), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (ldh) (n = 105), or prior pelvic radiation (n = 54). Based on phase i results, patients with prior pelvic radiation received capecitabine 750 mg/m2 twice daily. The goal was to ascertain efficacy in a design that was unlikely to cause high levels of toxicity. RESULTS: Median age in the patient cohort was 72 years. A median of 5 and a mean of 8 capecitabine cycles were given (range: 0-50 cycles). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred in 25% of patients during the first 3 cycles (8.1% hand-foot syndrome, 7.7% diarrhea). The response rate was 13.6%, with a 69.7% disease control rate. Median progression-free survival (pfs) was 5.6 months. Post progression, 56 patients received further capecitabine monotherapy (median of 4 additional cycles). Median overall survival duration for the patients was 14.3 months. Median survival was significantly higher for those who, at baseline, had an ecog performance status of 0 (compared with 1 or more) and normal ldh (compared with elevated ldh). CONCLUSIONS: Toxicity is less with dose-reduced capecitabine than with historical full-dose capecitabine, with only a small trade-off in efficacy, seen as a lower objective response rate. The improved tolerability could lead to an increased number of cycles of therapy, and pfs appears to be consistently higher at the lower dose. Those observations should, in the absence of a head-to-head clinical trial, be viewed as compelling evidence that 1000 mg/m2, or even 750 mg/m2, twice daily is an appropriate dose in elderly or frail patients with acrc.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: Practice Patterns and Effectiveness in the General Population.

AIMS: Although guidelines do not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for stage II colon cancer, many state that ACT may be considered in high-risk disease. Here we describe practice patterns and outcomes associated with ACT in the general population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All cases of colon cancer diagnosed in Ontario 2002-2008 were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry, which was linked to electronic treatment records. Pathology reports were obtained for a 25% random sample of cases. High-risk disease was defined as: T4 tumours, <12 lymph nodes, poorly differentiated histology, lymphovascular invasion. Modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate factors associated with ACT. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to explore the association between ACT and cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival. RESULTS: The study population included 2488 patients with stage II colon cancer; 1175 (47%) with high-risk disease. ACT was delivered to 18% of all patients and 24% of patients with high-risk disease. ACT rates were higher among younger patients (51% age 20-49 years versus 16% age 70-79, P < 0.001) and varied considerably across geographic regions (range 10-39%, P < 0.001). Among all patients with stage II colon cancer, ACT was not associated with improved CSS (hazard ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.82) or overall survival (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.42). Stratified survival analysis for patients with high-risk disease did not show benefit to ACT (CSS hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.55; overall survival hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.31). CONCLUSION: ACT use varies across age groups and geographic regions. ACT is not associated with improved survival among patients with stage II colon cancer including those with high-risk disease.

Chemotherapy delivery for resected colorectal cancer liver metastases: Management and outcomes in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend peri-operative chemotherapy for patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Chemotherapy delivery in routine practice is not well described. METHODS: All cases of CRC who underwent resection of LM in 2002-2009 were identified using the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry. Electronic treatment records identified chemotherapy delivered within 16 weeks before or after hepatectomy. All pathology reports were reviewed to describe extent of LM. Modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate factors associated with chemotherapy delivery. Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score analysis were used to explore the association between post-operative chemotherapy and cancer-specific (CSS) and overall (OS) survival. RESULTS: We identified 1310 patients. Sixty-two percent of cases (815/1310) received peri-operative chemotherapy; 25% (200/815) pre-operative, 45% (366/815) post-operative, and 31% (249/815) pre- and post-operative. Utilization of chemotherapy increased over time from 51% in 2002 (57/112) to 73% in 2009 (157/216, p < 0.001). Fifty-four percent of patients received FOLFOX, 41% FOLFIRI, and 10% 5-FU monotherapy. Factors that were independently associated with greater utilization of post-operative chemotherapy included younger age (p < 0.001), female sex (p = 0.050), shorter disease-free interval (p = 0.006), and no prior adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Utilization of chemotherapy varied substantially across geographic regions (from 24% to 71%, p = 0.001). Post-operative chemotherapy was associated with improved CSS (HR 0.58, 95%CI 0.44-0.76) and OS (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.38-0.61); results were consistent in propensity score analysis. CONCLUSION: Utilization of chemotherapy for resected CRCLM in routine practice has evolved with emerging evidence. Post-operative chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in the general population.

Surgical resection and peri-operative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Most literature describing surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases (LM) comes from high volume centres. Here, we report management and outcomes achieved in routine clinical practice. METHODS: All cases of CRC in Ontario who underwent resection of LM in 1994-2009 were identified using the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry. Electronic treatment records identified chemotherapy delivery. Temporal trends are described for 3 periods: 1994-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2009. We describe volume of resected CRCLM as a ratio of incident cases per CRCLM resection. Overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) are measured from time of LM resection. RESULTS: 2717 patients underwent resection of CRCLM. Between 1994 and 2009 there was a 78% increase in case volume; from one resection for every 48 incident cases to one resection for every 27 incident cases, p < 0.001. Use of peri-operative chemotherapy increased over study periods from 44% (306/700), to 52% (429/830), to 65% (777/1187, p < 0.001). Chemotherapy utilization rates varied across geographic regions (range 43%-69%, p < 0.001). Post-operative mortality rates at 30 and 90 days were 2.5% and 4.3% respectively. Five year OS during the study periods was 36% (95% CI 32-39%), 40% (95% CI 36-43%), and 46% (95% CI 43-49%) (p < 0.001); CSS was 38% (95% CI 35-42%), 42% (95% CI 38-45%), 49% (95% CI 44-53%) (p < 0.001). The temporal improvement in OS/CSS persisted on adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of patients with resected CRCLM in routine practice is comparable to those reported from high volume centres. Survival improved over the study period despite a greater proportion of patients with CRC undergoing liver resection.

Chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the anal canal: a systematic review.

Squamous cell cancer of the anal canal is a rare tumour for which there remains uncertainty regarding optimal therapy. A systematic review was conducted to summarise the evidence examining concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy or different chemotherapy regimens in combination with radiotherapy. MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference proceedings were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials. Outcomes of interest were colostomy rate, local failure, overall survival, disease-free survival, adverse effects and quality of life. Six randomised controlled trials were identified. Two trials reported lower colostomy and local failure rates for concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus mitomycin C (MMC) and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone. The omission of MMC from this regimen resulted in higher colostomy and local failure rates and lower disease-free survival. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent 5-FU plus cisplatin and radiotherapy resulted in a higher colostomy rate than concurrent 5-FU plus MMC and radiotherapy. Haematological toxicity rates were lower in patients who received radiotherapy with 5-FU alone or 5-FU plus cisplatin compared with 5-FU plus MMC. No benefit was seen for the addition of induction or maintenance chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The available evidence continues to support the use of radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU and MMC as standard treatment for cancer of the anal canal to decrease colostomy and local failure rates.

Liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases.

QUESTIONS: Should surgery be considered for colorectal cancer (crc) patients who have liver metastases plus (a) pulmonary metastases, (b) portal nodal disease, or (c) other extrahepatic metastases (ehms)?What is the role of chemotherapy in the surgical management of crc with liver metastases in (a) patients with resectable disease in the liver, or (b) patients with initially unresectable disease in the liver that is downsized with chemotherapy ("conversion")?What is the role of liver resection when one or more crc liver metastases have radiographic complete response (rcr) after chemotherapy? PERSPECTIVES: Advances in chemotherapy have improved survival in crc patients with liver metastases. The 5-year survival with chemotherapy alone is typically less than 1%, although two recent studies with folfox or folfoxiri (or both) reported rates of 5%-10%. However, liver resection is the treatment that is most effective in achieving long-term survival and offering the possibility of a cure in stage iv crc patients with liver metastases. This guideline deals with the role of chemotherapy with surgery, and the role of surgery when there are liver metastases plus ehms. Because only a proportion of patients with crc metastatic disease are considered for liver resection, and because management of this patient population is complex, multidisciplinary management is required. METHODOLOGY: Recommendations in the present guideline were formulated based on a prepublication version of a recent systematic review on this topic. The draft methodology experts, and external review by clinical practitioners. Feedback was incorporated into the final version of the guideline. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: These recommendations apply to patients with liver metastases from crc who have had or will have a complete (R0) resection of the primary cancer and who are being considered for resection of the liver, or liver plus specific and limited ehms, with curative intent. 1(a). Patients with liver and lung metastases should be seen in consultation with a thoracic surgeon. Combined or staged metastasectomy is recommended when, taking into account anatomic and physiologic considerations, the assessment is that all pulmonary metastases can also be completely removed. Furthermore, liver resection may be indicated in patients who have had a prior lung resection, and vice versa.1(b). Routine liver resection is not recommended in patients with portal nodal disease. This group includes patients with radiologically suspicious portal nodes or malignant portal nodes found preoperatively or intraoperatively. Liver plus nodal resection, together with perioperative systemic therapy, may be an option-after a full discussion with the patient-in cases with limited nodal involvement and with metastases that can be completely resected.1(c). Routine liver resection is not recommended in patients with nonpulmonary ehms. Liver plus extrahepatic resection, together with perioperative systemic therapy, may be an option-after a full discussion with the patient-for metastases that can be completely resected.2(a). Perioperative chemotherapy, either before and after resection, or after resection, is recommended in patients with resectable liver metastatic disease. This recommendation extends to patients with ehms that can be completely resected (R0). Risks and potential benefits of perioperative chemotherapy should be discussed for patients with resectable liver metastases. The data on whether patients with previous oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy or a short interval from completion of adjuvant therapy for primary crc might benefit from perioperative chemotherapy are limited.2(b). Liver resection is recommended in patients with initially unresectable metastatic liver disease who have a sufficient downstaging response to conversion chemotherapy. If complete resection has been achieved, postoperative chemotherapy should be considered.3. Surgical resection of all lesions, including lesions with rcr, is recommended when technically feasible and when adequate functional liver can be left as a remnant. When a lesion with rcr is present in a portion of the liver that cannot be resected, surgery may still be a reasonable therapeutic strategy if all other visible disease can be resected. Postoperative chemotherapy might be considered in those patients. Close follow-up of the lesion with rcr is warranted to allow localized treatment or further resection for an in situ recurrence.

A phase II study of sunitinib in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: an NCIC Clinical Trials Group Study.

PURPOSE: Sunitinib is a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We conducted a two-stage phase II study to evaluate the objective response rate of oral sunitinib in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility required measurable disease and one or two prior chemotherapies, at least one platinum based. Platinum-sensitive or -resistant disease was allowed. Initial dose schedule was sunitinib 50 mg daily, 4 of 6 weeks. Observation of fluid accumulations during off-treatment periods resulted in adoption of continuous 37.5 mg daily dosing in the second stage of accrual. RESULTS: Of 30 eligible patients, most had serous histology (67%), were platinum sensitive (73%) and had two prior chemotherapies (60%). One partial response (3.3%) and three CA125 responses (10%) were observed, all in platinum-sensitive patients using intermittent dosing. Sixteen (53%) had stable disease. Five had >30% decrease in measurable disease. Overall median progression-free survival was 4.1 months. Common adverse events included fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, hand-foot syndrome and hypertension. No gastrointestinal perforation occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent sunitinib has modest activity in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, but only at the 50 mg intermittent dose schedule, suggesting that dose and schedule may be vital considerations in further evaluation of sunitinib in this cancer setting.

Decreased dose density of standard chemotherapy does not compromise survival for ovarian cancer patients.

For women diagnosed with ovarian cancer, the standard practice of surgery followed by adjuvant platinum-taxane combination chemotherapy, with cycles administered every 3 weeks, is based on randomized control trials. However, a substantial number of patients require delays or reductions on this schedule. The Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario (CCSEO) has historically administered chemotherapy every 4 weeks. We analyzed survival outcomes of our cohort. All ovarian cancer patients treated with chemotherapy at the CCSEO from 1995 to end-2002 were included in this study. Overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated from initiation of chemotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier technique and log-rank tests. Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for age and disease stage. A total of 171 patients were treated with chemotherapy (cisplatin-paclitaxel or carboplatin-paclitaxel), of which 144 received chemotherapy every 4 weeks and 27 every 3 weeks. Median progression-free survival was 19.2 months for the group treated every 4 weeks vs 13.2 months for the 3-weekly group. Median overall survival was 36.5 months compared to 27.1 months, respectively. Trends favored treatment every 4 weeks. In early-stage disease, 5-year overall survival was 74% and 5-year progression-free survival was 68%. Administration of platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy every 4 weeks did not reduce survival of ovarian cancer patients. Importantly, median survival is favorable compared to results from landmark trials where patients were treated every 3 weeks. These results suggest that decreasing the frequency of chemotherapy cycles does not decrease survival. Prospective trials would be required to compare quality of life and cost-effectiveness.

A phase II study of dexamethasone, ifosfamide, cisplatin and etoposide (DICE) as salvage chemotherapy for patients with relapsed and refractory lymphoma.

The 4-day combination of dexamethasone, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and etoposide (DICE) is a salvage regimen for lymphoma. We report a prospective phase II multi-center trial of a modified DICE regimen in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin (HL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), constituting a single day of intravenous administration followed by 3 days of oral administration, aimed at reducing inpatient days without losing efficacy. Forty patients (median age 56, range 25 - 79) were included: 28 (70%) NHL, 9 (23%) HL and 3 (8%) CLL. Fifty-three per cent had received 2 prior treatment regimens. International Prognostic Index (IPI) was 2 in 75% of NHL patients. Patients aged 55 and those with previous autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) started on a lower-dose regimen, with dose escalation possible in 2 patients. Overall response rate was 41%. Thirty-eight per cent of patients had stable disease. With a median of 3.1 years of follow-up, estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3 years were 15% and 43% respectively. OS was longer in the < 55 compared to the 55 age cohort (P = 0.0091), longer for HL than NHL (P = 0.59 and 0.039 respectively) and longer for Low/Low-Int IPI than High/High-Int IPI (P = 0.0074 and 0.0009 respectively). Median duration of inpatient stay was 3 days. There were no treatment-related deaths. In conclusion, this modification of DICE is an effective and well tolerated salvage regimen, even in this poor prognosis group of patients. Further clinical studies of DICE in first relapse and in older patients, possibly with the addition of rituximab, are warranted.

Systemic treatment policies in ovarian cancer: the next 10 years.

Over the past two decades, the development of treatment policies and practice standards has become formalized. In ovarian cancer, most attention has been focused on the development of policies for front-line systemic treatment, using survival as the major outcome that should drive change. This review summarizes the evidence that supported the emergence of paclitaxel-carboplatin as a widely used standard of care for front-line therapy and some of the contradictory data from randomized studies. Furthermore, recently completed or ongoing randomized studies of the addition of a third cytotoxic agent to paclitaxel-carboplatin are summarized. Finally, some novel noncytotoxic approaches are discussed. New standards of care and treatment policies in the next decade will be based on high-quality evidence of improved survival from controlled studies. Many such trials are now ongoing or planned.

Efficacy of thalidomide therapy for extramedullary relapse of myeloma following allogeneic transplantation.

Treatment options for patients with myeloma who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation are limited. Thalidomide, an antineoplastic agent, has been shown to be effective in multiple myeloma through proposed mechanisms that may include angiogenesis inhibition. Herein we report successful thalidomide treatment of four patients who relapsed following allogeneic transplantation, three of whom had predominantly extramedullary relapse. Thalidomide was well tolerated in all patients; in two patients interferon-alpha was subsequently added to thalidomide as maintenance therapy without worsening graft-versus-host disease. We suggest that extramedullary myeloma is particularly sensitive to thalidomide, speculating that growth biology may in part be dependent on angiogenesis.