Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Entomol ; 57(1): 113-121, 2020 01 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31576406

ABSTRACT

Insects are ectothermic organisms; hence, all aspects of their biology are strongly influenced by ambient temperatures. Different insect species respond differently with phenotypic plasticity and/or genetic adaptation to changing temperatures. Here, we tested the thermal adaptation of the house fly and three of its parasitoids species by comparing life-history parameters in populations from a hot climate region (Jordan Valley) and from a moderate-climate region (Galilee). No significant differences were found between the two house fly populations, both under hot and moderate experimental conditions. Life-history parameters of the parasitoids (Muscidifurax raptor Girault & Sanders, Spalangia endius Walker, and Spalangia cameroni Perkins [Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae]) varied markedly between origins, species, sexes, and experimental conditions. Of the three species tested, only M. raptor collected in the Jordan Valley proved better adapted to experimental heat conditions, compared to its counterpart population that was collected in the Galilee. Additionally, we tested the effect of elevating temperatures on a house fly lab population for 17 consecutive generations and found no evidence for heat adaptation. We discuss our results in the context of house fly control and global warming.


Subject(s)
Host-Parasite Interactions , Houseflies/physiology , Pest Control, Biological , Wasps/physiology , Animal Distribution , Animals , Female , Houseflies/growth & development , Houseflies/parasitology , Israel , Larva/growth & development , Larva/parasitology , Larva/physiology , Male , Pupa/growth & development , Pupa/parasitology , Pupa/physiology , Sex Factors , Species Specificity , Thermotolerance
2.
J Med Entomol ; 56(6): 1650-1660, 2019 10 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31198940

ABSTRACT

Colonies of house flies (Musca domestica L. [Diptera: Muscidae]) and four species of parasitoids (Muscidifurax raptor Girault and Sanders, Muscidifurax zaraptor Kogan and Legner, Spalangia cameroni Perkins and Spalangia endius Walker) were established by making collections from dairy farms near Bell, FL, Beatrice, NE, Minneapolis, MN, and San Jacinto, CA. Colonies were assessed for heat tolerance by comparing life history parameters at 25-27°C and fluctuating hot (26.7-41.7°C) temperatures. Muscidifurax raptor, S. cameroni, and S. endius produced 24-28% as many progeny under hot conditions as at 25°C. Colonies of M. zaraptor were more heat-tolerant and produced an average 46.9% as many progeny under the hot regime compared with moderate conditions. There was little evidence for higher heat tolerance in parasitoid populations from historically hot locations (CA desert and FL). Colonies of M. raptor and S. endius that had been in culture for 24 yr were the least heat-tolerant with regard to progeny production. House flies collected from the same locations varied little in longevity, fecundity, or egg-to-adult survival under either hot or moderate regimes. Flies reared under hot conditions laid about half as many eggs (89/female) and had about half the egg-adult survival rate (47.3%) under hot compared with moderate conditions, indicating that heat stress had less effect on flies than on all of the parasitoids except M. zaraptor. An attempt to select for heat tolerance in flies by subjecting them to incremental increases in rearing temperatures for 20 generations resulted in little change in tolerance among the selected flies.


Subject(s)
Host-Parasite Interactions , Hot Temperature , Muscidae/parasitology , Pest Control, Biological , Wasps/growth & development , Animals , Larva/growth & development , Larva/parasitology , Muscidae/growth & development , Pupa/growth & development , Pupa/parasitology , United States
3.
Pest Manag Sci ; 73(12): 2456-2464, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28692174

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The housefly, Musca domestica L., is an important pest of animal agriculture. Effective fly management requires integration of manure management, mass trapping, biological control, and selective insecticide use. Insecticidal control of houseflies is difficult due to the rapidity of resistance development, yet the insect growth regulator pyriproxyfen (PPF) is one of few insecticides that may still be effective. Here, we tested the susceptibility of wild housefly populations in the USA and in Israel to PPF, as well as the effect of PPF on housefly parasitoids of the genera Muscidifurax and Spalangia. RESULTS: Most housefly populations from both countries were completely eliminated at PPF concentrations of 100 mg kg-1 (USA) and 600 mg kg-1 (Israel). One population from each country exhibited initial levels of PPF tolerance. PPF efficacy significantly decreased in cow manure. Emergence rates of parasitoids developing in PPF-treated hosts at concentrations of ≥600 mg kg-1 were significantly affected, whereas other fitness parameters were moderately to non-affected. CONCLUSIONS: PPF is still an effective tool for housefly control, but resistance management practices should be employed to avoid resistance. PPF is compatible with principal housefly parasitoids at concentrations <600 mg kg-1 , and is suitable for use in integrated pest management. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.


Subject(s)
Houseflies/drug effects , Insecticides/pharmacology , Pyridines/pharmacology , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Houseflies/growth & development , Insect Control , Insecticides/analysis , Israel , Pyridines/analysis , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...