ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the approach and outcomes from two cancer centres in Southern and Northern Europe during the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Data collection was performed on a retrospective cohort of patients surgically treated for primary HNC between March and May 2020, using data from two tertiary hospitals: the European Institute of Oncology (Milan) and Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (London). RESULTS: We included 77 patients with HNC. More patients with COVID-19 were taking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and had Clavien-Dindo Classification grade I compared to negative patients, respectively (60% vs 22% [p = 0.058] and 40% vs 8% [p = 0.025]). Multivariate logistic regression analyses confirmed our data (p = 0.05 and 0.03, respectively). Sex and age were statistically significantly different (p = 0.05 and <0.001 respectively), showing more male patients (75% vs 53.66%, respectively) and more elderly patients in Italy than in the United Kingdom (patients aged >63 years: 69.44% vs 29.27%). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a large cohort of patients with HNC with nasopharyngeal swab during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. Patients with HNC with COVID-19 appeared more likely to develop postsurgical complications and to be taking ACE inhibitors. The preventive measures adopted guaranteed the continuation of therapeutic surgical intervention.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Advanced-stage laryngeal cancer is a challenging disease that needs multimodal treatment. Medical and surgical organ-preservation strategies have been developing in the last decades to spare these functions while granting cancer cure. The current work presents the experience of a tertiary-care center in conservative surgery for advanced-stage laryngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected clinical data of patients submitted to open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs) and any possible adjuvant treatment from 2005 to 2018. Outcomes were also compared to the most recent studies reporting on both medical and surgical organ-preservation strategies. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were included in the analysis. Adjuvant therapy was employed in 51% of cases. The local control rate was 96.4%, while overall survival (OS) was 67%, and laryngo-esophageal dysfunction free survival (LEDFS) was 66%. Stage IV and vascular invasion were associated with a statistically-significant worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: OPHLs are valid as upfront treatment in fit patients affected by advanced-stage laryngeal cancer. Disease control and function preservation are granted in a significant percentage of cases, even when followed by adjuvant therapy.
