ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little is known about isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) completion rates among children or adolescents compared to adults living with HIV in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis including children, adolescents, and adults living with HIV who were treated at FHI360 and partners-implemented HIV care programs at six health zones in Kinshasa, DRC, from 2004 to 2020. The primary outcome was the proportion of children, adolescents versus adults who did complete 6 months of daily self-administered IPT. Log-binomial regression assessed independent predictors of IPT non-completion and Kaplan-Meier technique for survival analysis. RESULTS: Of 11,691 eligible patients on ART who initiated IPT, 429 were children (<11 years), 804 adolescents (11-19 years), and 10,458 adults (≥20 years). The median age was 7 (IQR: 3-9) years for children, 15 (IQR: 13-17) years for adolescents, and 43 (35-51) years for adults. Among those who were initiated on IPT, 5625 out of 11,691 people living with HIV (PLHIV) had IPT completion outcome results, and an overall 3457/5625 (61.5%) completion rate was documented. Compared to adults, children and adolescents were less likely to complete IPT [104/199 (52.3%) and 268/525 (51.0%), respectively, vs. 3085/4901 (62.9%)]. After adjustment, the only independent predictors for IPT non-completion were health zone of residence and type of ART regimen. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed comparable poor survival among patients who completed IPT versus those who did not (p-value for log-rank test, 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The overall sub-optimal IPT completion rate in adults as well as children/adolescents in this setting is of great concern. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate the specific barriers to IPT completion among children, adolescents, and adults in DRC as well as the scale-up of evidence-informed interventions to improve IPT completion, such as adoption of shorter TB preventive regimens.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Latent Tuberculosis , Tuberculosis , Adult , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Isoniazid/therapeutic use , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Democratic Republic of the Congo/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
Background: Little is known about advanced HIV disease (AHD) at antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation among children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV) and related age disparities in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of routine program data collected among adults, adolescents, and children living with HIV in 6 health zones in Kinshasa, DRC from 2005 to 2020. Results: Thirty-two percent of those who initiated ART had AHD. Compared to adults, adolescents had a 15% higher risk of AHD (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.08-1.21; P < .001). Despite their higher risk of AHD, adolescents had a lower risk of mortality (aSHR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.52-0.99; P = .047) and lower cumulative death events versus adults (aSHR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.34-0.59; P < .001). Conclusions: ADH at ART initiation is highly prevalent in Kinshasa, DRC, and adolescents are disproportionally impacted. There is a need to scale up high-impact HIV interventions targeting CALHIV.
A study to understand advanced HIV disease (AHD) among people living with HIV (PLHIVs) when they start antiretroviral treatment in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, including how common it is, how it affects PLHIVs, and how AHD and its consequences differ between children, adolescent, and adult PLHIVs.Why was the study done? Some PLHIVs discover their HIV status later after being infected, and others delay starting treatment once a diagnosis is made. These situations could lead to AHD at the start of antiretroviral treatment. AHD is a severe form of HIV disease, and people who start antiretrovirals with AHD could be at risk of several complications, including death, opportunistic infections, and higher cost of treatment. There is limited evidence about AHD among PLHIV who start antiretrovirals in the DRC and related disparities between children, adolescents, and adults in the country. What did the researchers do? We analyzed data from an HIV program implemented in Kinshasa, DRC, from 2005 to 2020. The analysis examined how common AHD is among PLHIVs, how it affects them, and how AHD and its consequences differ between children, adolescents, and adult PLHIVs. What did the researchers find? The study found that a third of all PLHIVs who started antiretrovirals had AHD. Adolescents were more affected by AHD than adults, and there were no differences between adults and children. Despite their higher risk of AHD than adults, adolescents had lower chances of dying than adults. What do the findings mean? These findings have significant implications for HIV interventions in the DRC. The study highlights the need for more effective HIV interventions targeting PLHIVs, with a focus on early diagnosis and treatment initiation. The results also suggest that interventions tailored explicitly for adolescents may be necessary to address the disproportionate impact of AHD on this population. Overall, the study provides important information on the burden of HIV in the DRC and highlights the need for continued efforts to address this public health challenge.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Adult , Child , Humans , Adolescent , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Democratic Republic of the Congo/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: New family planning (FP) product introduction requires understanding the target market and support from stakeholders from across the health sector. We aimed to understand the perspectives of FP providers and other stakeholders on the potential introduction of new subcutaneous (SC) depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injectable contraceptives lasting 4 and 6 months in Nigeria and Uganda. METHODS: Between July 2021 and February 2022, we conducted 48 in-depth interviews (IDIs) and 11 focus group discussions (FGDs) with FP providers and other stakeholders involved with service delivery, program management, and policymaking in Lagos and Abuja in Nigeria and Kampala and Luwero in Uganda. IDIs and FGDs explored respondents' reactions to and preferences for the new injectables lasting 4 and 6 months. RESULTS: Most respondents liked the idea of longer-acting DMPA-SC products, noting the potential for reduced facility visits for clients and workloads for providers, cost savings for users and the health system, and potential for improved commodity logistics. Some nonproviders raised concerns about confusion among providers and clients with the availability of multiple injectable products; however, providers did not share this concern. The greatest interest among all groups was for the 6-month injectable, even without the option for self-injection. Several respondents reported that self-injection is not widespread in either context, and some noted that contact with a provider would be important for products with longer durations. Respondents' acceptability of the new injectables assumed that side effects would be no worse than the existing 3-month product. CONCLUSIONS: Family planning stakeholders in Nigeria and Uganda are supportive of expanding the method mix with new injectables, which they see as having the potential to meet the needs of more users. Concerted engagement of health providers, policymakers, and the community will be necessary for successful introduction once these new contraceptive products are available.
Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents, Female , Female , Humans , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate , Uganda , Nigeria , Family Planning ServicesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For optimal growth and development, the World Health Organization recommends that children be exclusively breastfed for the first 6 months of life. However, according to the nationally-representative 2013-2014 Demographic and Health Survey, under 50% of babies in the Democratic Republic of Congo are exclusively breastfed. Although breastfeeding was common in the capital city of Kinshasa, one in five newborns received alternatives to breastmilk during the first 3 days of life. This analysis aimed to identify social norms influencing exclusive breastfeeding, the role of a young first-time mother's (FTM's) social network for her choice to exclusively breastfeed, and perceived social sanctions associated with breastfeeding practices in Kinshasa. METHODS: The qualitative analysis was based on a vignette presented during 14 focus group discussions, with a purposively selected sample (n = 162) of FTMs age 15-24, and the male partners, mothers and mothers-in-law of FTMs age 15-24 in three health zones in Kinshasa in 2017. Thematic content analysis was performed to identify concepts and patterns in the participants' discussions. RESULTS: Overall, community norms were not supportive of exclusive breastfeeding. The main barriers to exclusive breastfeeding were the belief held by most FTMs that exclusive breastfeeding was an uncommon practice; the desire to avoid negative sanctions such as name-calling and mockery for refusal to give babies water in the first 6 months of life; the desire to please key members of their social networks, specifically their mothers and friends, by doing what these influencers expected or preferred them to do; FTMs' own lack of experience with infant feeding; and trust placed in their mothers and friends. CONCLUSION: Social norms can be maintained by the belief about what others do, perceived expectations about what individuals ought to do, the negative sanctions they can face and their preference to conform to social expectations. Thus, addressing cultural beliefs and targeting sensitization efforts to key influencers that provide support to FTMs are needed to promote exclusive breastfeeding in Kinshasa. In doing so, strategies should address the barriers to exclusive breastfeeding including related misconceptions, and improve FTMs' self-efficacy to overcome the influence of others.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/psychology , Culture , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mothers/psychology , Social Norms , Adolescent , Adult , Democratic Republic of the Congo , Family/psychology , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Qualitative Research , Self Efficacy , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Given the promise of DMPA-SC to increase community-level access to modern contraception in developing countries, we conducted an observational study to assess the acceptability and feasibility of DMPA-SC self-injection among women in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and of medical/nursing (M/N) students as instructors for self-injection. STUDY DESIGN: Women who selected DMPA-SC at a community outreach event adjacent to a health center were interviewed upon acceptance (baseline) and then 3, 6 and 12â¯months later. RESULTS: Of 850 clients selecting DMPA-SC at baseline, 640 (75.3%) opted for self-injection over being injected by the M/N students for reasons of convenience and personal agency. Among these 640 self-injectors, 47.5% were anxious at baseline (for fear of needles or injecting incorrectly). Over 80% reported feeling very ready after training, confident that they knew how to self-inject and confident that they would remember the next injection date. By 3â¯months, 97% described it as easy. Half (54%) experienced side effects, mainly menstrual irregularities, the main reason for discontinuation. At 6-month follow-up, self-injectors cited effectiveness and ease of use as positive elements, though one quarter reported side effects. Their impressions of M/N students as instructors were highly positive. CONCLUSIONS: Where DMPA-SC was free and easily accessible, the majority of women interested in DMPA-SC opted to learn self-injection. The M/N students performed well in instructing women to self-inject. Clients were highly satisfied with the services received, yet many did not recognize their student status, possibly because outreach occurred near a health facility. Once told, clients remained very favorable, suggesting strong motivation to receive their preferred contraceptive free, whoever the provider. IMPLICATION STATEMENT: This study provides additional evidence on the acceptability and the feasibility of the self-injection of DMPA-SC by users from a resource-limited setting.
Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Patient Education as Topic , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , Self Administration , Students, Medical , Students, Nursing , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In high-resource settings, obstetric ultrasound is a standard component of prenatal care used to identify pregnancy complications and to establish an accurate gestational age in order to improve obstetric care. Whether or not ultrasound use will improve care and ultimately pregnancy outcomes in low-resource settings is unknown. METHODS/DESIGN: This multi-country cluster randomized trial will assess the impact of antenatal ultrasound screening performed by health care staff on a composite outcome consisting of maternal mortality and maternal near-miss, stillbirth and neonatal mortality in low-resource community settings. The trial will utilize an existing research infrastructure, the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research with sites in Pakistan, Kenya, Zambia, Democratic Republic of Congo and Guatemala. A maternal and newborn health registry in defined geographic areas which documents all pregnancies and their outcomes to 6 weeks post-delivery will provide population-based rates of maternal mortality and morbidity, stillbirth, neonatal mortality and morbidity, and health care utilization for study clusters. A total of 58 study clusters each with a health center and about 500 births per year will be randomized (29 intervention and 29 control). The intervention includes training of health workers (e.g., nurses, midwives, clinical officers) to perform ultrasound examinations during antenatal care, generally at 18-22 and at 32-36 weeks for each subject. Women who are identified as having a complication of pregnancy will be referred to a hospital for appropriate care. Finally, the intervention includes community sensitization activities to inform women and their families of the availability of ultrasound at the antenatal care clinic and training in emergency obstetric and neonatal care at referral facilities. DISCUSSION: In summary, our trial will evaluate whether introduction of ultrasound during antenatal care improves pregnancy outcomes in rural, low-resource settings. The intervention includes training for ultrasound-naïve providers in basic obstetric ultrasonography and then enabling these trainees to use ultrasound to screen for pregnancy complications in primary antenatal care clinics and to refer appropriately. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT # 01990625).