Preventing iatrogenic ureteral injury in colorectal surgery: a comprehensive and systematic review of the last 2 decades of literature and future perspectives.

Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) during colorectal surgery is a rare complication but related to a serious burden of morbidity. This comprehensive and systematic review aims to provide a critical overview of the most recent literature about IUI prevention techniques in colorectal surgery. We performed a comprehensive and systematic review of studies published from 2000 to 2022 and assessed the use of techniques for ureteral injury prevention and intraoperative localization. 26 publications were included, divided into stent-based (prophylactic/lighted ureteral stent and near-infrared fluorescent ureteral catheter [PUS/LUS/NIRFUC]) and fluorescent dye (FD) groups. Costs, the percentage and number of IUIs detected, reported limitations, complication rates and other outcome points were compared. The IUI incidence rate ranged from 0 to 1.9% (mean 0.5%) and 0 to 1.2% (mean 0.3%) in the PUS/LUS/NIRFUC and FD groups, respectively. The acute kidney injury (AKI) and urinary tact infection (UTI) incidence rate ranged from 0.4 to 32.6% and 0 to 17.3%, respectively, in the PUS/LUS/NIRFUC group and 0-15% and 0-6.3%, respectively, in the FD group. Many other complications were also compared and descriptively analyzed (length-of-stay, mortality, etc.). These techniques appear to be feasible and safe in select patients with a high risk of IUI, but the delineation of reliable guidelines for preventing IUI will require more randomized controlled trials.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma with Gastric Metastasis, a Rare Presentation: Case Report and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an infrequent, but highly aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasm of the skin with a propensity for recurrence and metastasis. We report a rare case of gastric metastatic localization of this cancer by focusing on the diagnostic, clinical, and surgical approach to the patient. CASE REPORT: Clinical presentation begins with a peripheral lymphadenopathy whose immunohistochemical characterization identifies the lymphatic dissemination of the disease. Gradually, the patient develops a severe anaemic state which requires several blood transfusions and surgical gastric resection to remove a large bleeding lesion of the antral region. The histopathological analysis of the specimen confirms the metastatic origin from MCC, but the primitive lesion remains unknown. DISCUSSION: Since this clinical situation is very rare, we conducted a review of the literature selecting the few cases reported, in order to evaluate the current knowledge on this topic. Metastatic involvement of the stomach from Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare presentation of this disease progression with a frequent delay in formulating the correct diagnosis and in further treatment which may be life-threatening for the patient. As regards the local treatment, there is no specific guideline, and the therapeutic indication should be tailored on the specific case.

How to resume safe access to a medical simulation center at the time of COVID-19 pandemic: The proposal of a protocol from a university institution in North-Eastern Italy.

INTRODUCTION: The Covid-19 global pandemic has suspended thousands of clinical education programs around the world. Also in Italy, as in the rest of the world, frontal teaching activities and internships in the medical field have been suspended. At the university hospital of Udine (North-Eastern Italy) it was decided to strengthen the use of simulation in all training stages to get over the block of training activities. METHODS: A protocol has been drawn up with the aim of providing training in safety for every student of the degree courses in medicine and health area and for doctors in residency training. In this way it was possible to carry out training sessions with a maximum of 6 students engaged in the simulation activities offered by the Center (3D) virtual cadaver, laparoscopic pelvic trainer stations, ultrasound laboratory, microsurgery, etc.). The key points of the protocol were represented by i) internet booking of the training activity; ii) respect of safety measures (hand hygiene, safe distance, restricted total number of presences, constant use of the surgical mask) and iii) reorganization of the material and cleaning of the rooms. RESULTS: Our educational strategy allowed to resume training activity maintaining adequate levels of safety for students and teachers. Applying our protocol, it was possible to guarantee safe access to our Medical Simulation Center (MSC) to a total of about 1400 students from different course of study during the period between June 2020 and February 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol could represent a practical tool in the management of resuming the activity at a MSC.

The rare Ogilvie's Syndrome in pregnancy. How to manage? A case report and literature review.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, or Ogilvie's syndrome (OS), is a complication in gynaecology and obstetrics. Its occurrence during pregnancy is rare, redefining the therapeutic decision-making and treatment options. In this review we describe the case of a 37-year-old pregnant patient who developed OS at the 30th week of gestation. A laparotomy with colonic decompression was performed. Foetal condition, regularly monitored throughout the hospital stay, remained normal. The patient experienced an uncomplicated, natural delivery at 40 weeks. A comprehensive literature search, describing the occurrence of OS during pregnancy, was conducted. We identified six cases of OS arising during pregnancy. Demographic, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic features were analysed. Non-surgical management is generally the first-line option, with intravenous drug administration, rectal and nasogastric tube positioning and colonoscopic decompression the treatments of choice. Surgical decompression in usually performed in cases of failure of the first-line treatments. Including our own experience, in all cases, neither maternal nor foetal mortality was reported. A conservative approach is mandatory as first-line treatment, but when prompt resolution is not achieved, a multidisciplinary team, involving the gynaecologist/obstetrician, the surgeon, the radiologist and the intensivist is mandatory to avoid diagnostic delays, thereby reducing morbidity and mortality rates.

Duodenal Obstruction in a Patient Previously Treated With EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing System Repair.

The Nellix® endovascular aneurysm sealing system (EVAS) is a relatively novel approach for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). We present herein a case of duodenal obstruction (DO) which occurred following an EVAS treatment for the repair of an AAA. A 77-year old man was admitted to our hospital with acute abdominal pain and recurrent vomiting. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a retroperitoneal 66 × 59 × 90 mm (antero-posterior, AP; latero-lateral, LL; cranio-caudal: CC) solid mass located in the epigastrium, corresponding to the infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm sac, previously treated by EVAS. An exploratory laparotomy was performed, which revealed a retroperitoneal mass compressing the third and fourth parts of the duodenum. A gastroenteroanastomosis was performed in order to bypass the duodenal obstruction. An extensive search of biomedical literature databases was conducted to identify similar cases. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of DO following an AAA repair with EVAS.

General surgery and COVID-19: review of practical recommendations in the first pandemic phase.

BACKGROUND: In March, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. The absence of previous knowledge of COVID-19 has made decision-making difficult for all in health care, including surgical departments. We reviewed the management recommendations for surgical activity and changes to surgical practice, identifying concordances and discrepancies, based on the literature published in the early phase of the pandemic. METHOD: We searched the electronic datasets, PubMed Database, Google, and Google Scholar, using the keywords "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19", "surgery", "recommendations", "guideline", and "triage". The search was limited to the first 2 months after the pandemic began and was closed on May 6, 2020. RESULTS: Twenty papers were included in the analysis and their recommendations are divided into the following categories: 1. general aspects, such as maintaining the safety of health personnel and indications for surgery. 2. The preoperative phase, with recommendations about activating different care pathways for COVID-19 positive patients. 3. The operative phase, with recommendations about activating safety measures for aerosol-generating procedures. 4. The postoperative phase, with recommendations for managing operating theatres and patient transfers. CONCLUSION: The recommendations proposed in the revised documents are considered good practices aimed at keeping patients and healthcare professionals safe. However, these recommendations must be contextualized in each individual hospital.