Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biology (Basel) ; 13(4)2024 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666820

ABSTRACT

The silver-cheeked toadfish Lagocephalus sceleratus (Gmelin 1789), and to a lesser degree the orange spotted toadfish Torquigener hypselogeneion (Bleeker, 1852), pose threats to human health from physical attacks and poisonings in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. This study reviewed human health-related impacts resulting from these pufferfish, compiling and assessing records from online sources, the peer-reviewed literature, medical records, personal interviews, and observations across the Eastern Mediterranean in the years 2004 to 2023. A total of 198 events impacting human health were documented: 28 records of physical attacks, at least 144 non-lethal poisoning episodes, and 27 human fatalities resulting from consumption. The majority of the reported incidences occurred in Syria, Türkiye, and Lebanon. Most physical attacks occurred in summer, while most poisoning events occurred during winter. The number of recorded incidents greatly increased after 2019, especially with regard to poisonings, yet whether this is related to greater media attention, or to increased fish abundance is unclear. This is the first comprehensive study to collate findings on attacks, poisonings and fatalities caused by these pufferfish in the Mediterranean Sea, and may help in improving national health policies. We urge the continuation of national campaigns to caution residents and tourists of these species' high toxicities and potential aggressiveness.

2.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251086, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33945562

ABSTRACT

The 2020's update of marine alien species list from Turkey yielded a total of 539 species belonging to 18 taxonomic groups, 404 of which have become established in the region and 135 species are casual. A total of 185 new alien species have been added to the list since the previous update of 2011. The present compilation includes reports of an ascidian species (Rhodosoma turcicum) new to the marine fauna of Turkey and range extensions of six species. Among the established species, 105 species have invasive characters at least in one zoogeographic region, comprising 19% of all alien species. Mollusca ranked first in terms of the number of species (123 species), followed by Foraminifera (91 species), Pisces (80 species) and Arthropoda (79 species). The number of alien species found in seas surrounding Turkey ranged from 28 (Black Sea) to 413 (Levantine Sea). The vectoral importance of the Suez Canal diminishes when moving from south to north, accounting for 72% of species introductions in the Levantine Sea vs. only 11% of species introductions in the Black Sea. Most alien species on the coasts of Turkey were originated from the Red Sea (58%), due to the proximity of the country to the Suez Canal. Shipping activities transported 39% of alien species, mainly from the Indo-Pacific area (20%) and the Atlantic Ocean (10%). Misidentified species (such as Pterois volitans, Trachurus declivis, etc.) and species those classified as questionable or cryptogenic were omitted from the list based on new data gathered in the last decade and expert judgements. The documented impacts of invasive species on socio-economy, biodiversity and human health in the last decade as well as the legislation and management backgrounds against alien species in Turkey are presented.


Subject(s)
Fishes/physiology , Urochordata/physiology , Animals , Atlantic Ocean , Biodiversity , Black Sea , Ecosystem , Humans , Indian Ocean , Introduced Species , Turkey
3.
Zootaxa ; 4751(3): zootaxa.4751.3.12, 2020 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32230414

ABSTRACT

The recent paper by Artüz Fricke (2019) is focused on the analysis of marine teleost fishes of the Sea of Marmara, where they have tried to correct doubtful species occurrences and presented an annotated checklist. In a few cases, the authors have provided convincing data for the removal of some species from the regional inventory, such as Apogon imberbis (Linnaeus, 1758), Scomberesox saurus (Walbaum, 1792) and Polyprion americanus (Bloch Schneider, 1801), and pointed out revision-seeking genera (i.e. Alosa spp., Pegusa spp., etc.), which should certainly be taken into consideration. However, the paper also raises several doubts resulting from mistranslations of some previous research, misinterpretation and incomplete examination of certain published biodiversity data related to the Sea of Marmara. Despite the authors presented a number of mistaken first record data (for example Sardinella aurita Valenciennes, 1837, for full account see Bilecenoglu et al. 2002), included some unsubstantiated/questionable species (such as Symphodus melops (Linnaeus, 1758), Gobius vittatus Vinciguerra, 1883, etc.), and unexpectedly neglected the occurrence of some common coastal and deepsea species from the area, such as Arnoglossus kessleri Schmidt, 1915, Gobius bucchichi Steindachner, 1870, Labrus merula Linnaeus, 1758, Parablennius zvonimiri (Kolombatovic, 1892) and Argyropelecus hemigymnus Cocco, 1829, I herein concentrate solely on the erroneous/invalid records (totaling 42 fish species) with appropriate explanations.


Subject(s)
Fishes , Perciformes , Animals , Biodiversity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL