Evaluation of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) Samples from Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for Whole Genome, Whole Exome and Comprehensive Panel Sequencing.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is often the only source of tumor tissue from patients with advanced, inoperable lung cancer. EBUS-TBNA aspirates are used for the diagnosis, staging, and genomic testing to inform therapy options. Here we extracted DNA and RNA from 220 EBUS-TBNA aspirates to evaluate their suitability for whole genome (WGS), whole exome (WES), and comprehensive panel sequencing. For a subset of 40 cases, the same nucleic acid extraction was sequenced using WGS, WES, and the TruSight Oncology 500 assay. Genomic features were compared between sequencing platforms and compared with those reported by clinical testing. A total of 204 aspirates (92.7%) had sufficient DNA (100 ng) for comprehensive panel sequencing, and 109 aspirates (49.5%) had sufficient material for WGS. Comprehensive sequencing platforms detected all seven clinically reported tier 1 actionable mutations, an additional three (7%) tier 1 mutations, six (15%) tier 2-3 mutations, and biomarkers of potential immunotherapy benefit (tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability). As expected, WGS was more suited for the detection and discovery of emerging novel biomarkers of treatment response. WGS could be performed in half of all EBUS-TBNA aspirates, which points to the enormous potential of EBUS-TBNA as source material for large, well-curated discovery-based studies for novel and more effective predictors of treatment response. Comprehensive panel sequencing is possible in the vast majority of fresh EBUS-TBNA aspirates and enhances the detection of actionable mutations over current clinical testing.

Discrepancies in tumor mutation burden reporting from sequential endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration samples within single lymph node stations - brief report.

Introduction: Tumour Mutation Burden (TMB) is a potential biomarker for immune cancer therapies. Here we investigated parameters that might affect TMB using duplicate cytology smears obtained from endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA)-sampled malignant lymph nodes. Methods: Individual Diff-Quik cytology smears were prepared for each needle pass. DNA extracted from each smear underwent sequencing using large gene panel (TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500 - Illumina)). TMB was estimated using the TSO500 Local App v. 2.0 (Illumina). Results: Twenty patients had two or more Diff-Quik smears (total 45 smears) which passed sequencing quality control. Average smear TMB was 8.7 ± 5.0 mutations per megabase (Mb). Sixteen of the 20 patients had paired samples with minimal differences in TMB score (average difference 1.3 ± 0.85). Paired samples from 13 patients had concordant TMB (scores below or above a threshold of 10 mutations/Mb). Markedly discrepant TMB was observed in four cases, with an average difference of 11.3 ± 2.7 mutations/Mb. Factors affecting TMB calling included sample tumour content, the amount of DNA used in sequencing, and bone fide heterogeneity of node tumour between paired samples. Conclusion: TMB assessment is feasible from EBUS-TBNA smears from a single needle pass. Repeated samples of a lymph node station have minimal variation in TMB in most cases. However, this novel data shows how tumour content and minor change in site of node sampling can impact TMB. Further study is needed on whether all node aspirates should be combined in 1 sample, or whether testing independent nodes using smears is needed.

Whole Genome Sequencing in Advanced Lung Cancer can be Performed Using Diff-Quik Cytology Smears Derived from Endobronchial Ultrasound, Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS TBNA).

INTRODUCTION: Maximising alternative sample types for genomics in advanced lung cancer is important because bronchoscopic samples may sometimes be insufficient for this purpose. Further, the clinical applications of comprehensive molecular analysis such as whole genome sequencing (WGS) are rapidly developing. Diff-Quik cytology smears from EBUS TBNA is an alternative source of DNA, but its feasibility for WGS has not been previously demonstrated. METHODS: Diff-Quik smears were collected along with research cell pellets. RESULTS: Tumour content of smears were compared to research cell pellets from 42 patients, which showed good correlation (Spearman correlation 0.85, P < 0.0001). A subset of eight smears underwent WGS, which presented similar mutation profiles to WGS of the matched cell pellet. DNA yield was predicted using a regression equation of the smears cytology features, which correctly predicted DNA yield > 1500 ng in 7 out of 8 smears. CONCLUSIONS: WGS of commonly collected Diff-Quik slides is feasible and their DNA yield can be predicted.

Evaluating Diff-Quik cytology smears for large-panel mutation testing in lung cancer-Predicting DNA content and success with low-malignant-cellularity samples.

BACKGROUND: Cytology smears are commonly collected during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) procedures but are rarely used for molecular testing. Studies are needed to demonstrate their great potential, in particular for the prediction of malignant cell DNA content and for utility in molecular diagnostics using large gene panels. METHODS: A prospective study was performed on samples from 66 patients with malignant lymph nodes who underwent EBUS TBNA. All patients had air-dried, Diff-Quik cytology smears and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks collected for cytopathology and molecular testing. One hundred eighty-five smears were evaluated by microscopy to estimate malignant cell percentage and abundance and to calculate smear size and were subjected to DNA extraction. DNA from 56 smears from 27 patients was sequenced with the TruSight Oncology 500 assay (Illumina). RESULTS: Each microscopy parameter had a significant effect on the DNA yield. An algorithm was developed that predicted a >50-ng DNA yield of a smear with an area under the curve of 0.86. Fifty DNA samples (89%) with varying malignant yields were successfully sequenced. Low-malignant-cell content (<25%) and smear area (<15%) were the main reasons for failure. All standard-of-care mutations were detected in replicate smears from individual patients, regardless of malignant cell content. Tier 1/2 mutations were discovered in two cases where standard-of-care specimens were inadequate for sequencing. Smears were scored for tumor mutation burden. CONCLUSIONS: Microscopy of Diff-Quik smears can triage samples for comprehensive panel sequencing, which highlights smears as an excellent alternative to traditional testing with cell blocks.

Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield.

Introduction: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) is an important means of obtaining a tissue for advanced lung cancer. Optimizing the EBUS TBNA needling technique is important to maintain procedural simplicity and maximize sample quality for emerging molecular diagnostics. Methods: We prospectively explored three versus 10 agitations of the needle in sequential passes into the lymph node using separate needles. Resulting Diff-Quik cytology smears were quantitatively assessed using microscopic (tumor cell cellularity, abundance scores, erythrocyte contamination) and DNA yields. Microscopy was reported by two cytopathologists, and an inter-rater assessment was made by four additional cytopathologists. Results: In 86 patients confirmed as having malignant disease by EBUS TBNA (45 males, 41 females), a mean of 5.3 smears were made per patient with a total of 459 smears scored by pathologists and 168 paired smears extracted for DNA. There was no significant difference between three versus 10 agitations for smear cellularity (p = 0.44), DNA yield (p = 0.84), or DNA integrity (p = 0.20), but there was significantly less contamination by erythrocytes from three agitations (chi-square p = 0.008). There was significantly more DNA in the first pass into the node using three agitations than with other passes and with 10 agitations (pass × agitations interaction, p = 0.031). Reviewing pathologists correctly classified smears as more than or equal to 25% cellularity 86.3% of the time (κ = 0.63 [95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.71]). Conclusions: Three agitations are noninferior to 10 agitations for overall abundance of malignant cells and DNA content on smears. A smear with adequate DNA for panel sequencing could almost always be made with the first needle pass using three agitations.

Granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease: limiting immunosuppressive therapy-a single-centre experience.

Granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) is characterized by lymphocytic and granulomatous pulmonary infiltration occurring in common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). It is associated with increased mortality compared with CVID patients without GLILD. There are no treatment guidelines due to the low prevalence and the heterogeneity of the condition. A case review of three patients diagnosed with GLILD was performed from a single Australian centre. Patients met the European Society of Immunodeficiency criteria for CVID and a diagnosis of GLILD was confirmed by a multidisciplinary team. Patients were managed with immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement and immunosuppressive agents if required: the decision for immunosuppression was made on the basis of symptoms and declining pulmonary function. All patients clinically improved. One patient had immunosuppressive treatment ceased. GLILD responds to varying immunosuppressive regimes when IgG monotherapy fails. Immunosuppressive therapy can be discontinued following improvement, but patients require close observation. This series helps inform future GLILD treatment guidelines.

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Optimal Sampling Sequence in Radial Guide Sheath Endobronchial Ultrasound Lung Biopsy.

BACKGROUND: An optimal sampling sequence in radial guide sheath endobronchial ultrasound lung biopsy (R-EBUS) is unclear. This prospective single-center pilot randomized controlled trial aimed to determine if the initial method and sequence of sampling affect the diagnostic accuracy of the procedure. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing R-EBUS for lesions >15 mm with a bronchus sign were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to biopsy first (group A), brushings first (group B) or combination (group C). The primary outcome was a positive diagnosis from any sampling method. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were randomized. The overall diagnostic yield of the procedure was 77.8% (95% confidence interval: 66%-89%), with no difference between groups. A higher rate of positive cytology from brushings was seen if the biopsies were performed before brushings (77.8% in group A vs. 44.4% in group B, P=0.03). The rate of positive cytology from washings was higher if the washings were obtained just after the brushings (61.1% in group A vs. 11.1% in group B, P=0.02). There was no difference in the rate of positive biopsy histology in the groups (P=0.27). All 3 sampling modalities were more likely to be positive in group A (50.0% vs. 11.1% in group B and 22.2% in group C, P=0.04). Complications rate was low and not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The overall rate of a positive R-EBUS procedure was not affected by the initial sampling method or sequence. However, all 3 sampling modalities were more likely to be positive if biopsies were performed first, followed by brushings and washings.

Respiratory acute discharge service: a hospital in the home programme for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (RADS study).

BACKGROUND: Respiratory Acute Discharge Service (RADS) is a novel early discharge service with nurse-led community based recovery in selected patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. AIM: This pilot study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of the programme in an Australian tertiary hospital. METHODS: All patients who were recruited to RADS at Sunshine Coast University Hospital over a 6 months period from June to November 2018 were included. The co-primary outcomes were length of hospital days saved and rate of readmission within 30 days from discharge. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients (median age 74 years (interquartile range 70-80 years)) was recruited to the programme over the study period. The mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%) of the patients was 42% (standard deviation 19). The median length-of-stay prior to discharge on the RADS programme was 1 day (range 0-5), compared to a previous average of 5.8 days in our health service. Patients were on the programme for a median of 4 days (range 1-6). A total of 613 hospital bed days was saved over the study period, with significant cost savings. Forty-one (24.7%) patients represented to hospital within 30 days, the majority (64%) were due to recurrent symptoms. The rate of 30-day all-cause mortality for the study population was 1 (0.6%). CONCLUSION: Early supported discharge care model with nurse-led community based recovery after an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in selected patients is safe, and has the potential to provide greater flow through the hospital systems with cost effective care.

Rhodococcus equi infection: A diverse spectrum of disease.

Rhodococcus equi is a gram positive bacterium most commonly presenting clinically as pneumonia, however can disseminate to cause disease in virtually any human tissue. Although it is predominantly an opportunistic pathogen, a number of case series have described infection occurring among individuals with a normal immune system. We describe two cases of Rhodococcus equi infection which highlight the diversity of disease presentations of this rare organism.

Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion-2 (AMPLE-2) trial: a multicentre randomised study of aggressive versus symptom-guided drainage via indwelling pleural catheters.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) can complicate most cancers, causing dyspnoea and impairing quality of life (QoL). Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are a novel management approach allowing ambulatory fluid drainage and are increasingly used as an alternative to pleurodesis. IPC drainage approaches vary greatly between centres. Some advocate aggressive (usually daily) removal of fluid to provide best symptom control and chance of spontaneous pleurodesis. Daily drainages however demand considerably more resources and may increase risks of complications. Others believe that MPE care is palliative and drainage should be performed only when patients become symptomatic (often weekly to monthly). Identifying the best drainage approach will optimise patient care and healthcare resource utilisation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, open-label randomised trial. Patients with MPE will be randomised 1:1 to daily or symptom-guided drainage regimes after IPC insertion. Patient allocation to groups will be stratified for the cancer type (mesothelioma vs others), performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0-1 vs ≥2), presence of trapped lung (vs not) and prior pleurodesis (vs not). The primary outcome is the mean daily dyspnoea score, measured by a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) over the first 60 days. Secondary outcomes include benefits on physical activity levels, rate of spontaneous pleurodesis, complications, hospital admission days, healthcare costs and QoL measures. Enrolment of 86 participants will detect a mean difference of VAS score of 14 mm between the treatment arms (5% significance, 90% power) assuming a common between-group SD of 18.9 mm and a 10% lost to follow-up rate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Sir Charles Gairdner Group Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the study (number 2015-043). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615000963527; Pre-results.

Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant pleural effusion can complicate most cancers. It causes breathlessness and requires hospitalisation for invasive pleural drainages. Malignant effusions often herald advanced cancers and limited prognosis. Minimising time spent in hospital is of high priority to patients and their families. Various treatment strategies exist for the management of malignant effusions, though there is no consensus governing the best choice. Talc pleurodesis is the conventional management but requires hospitalisation (and substantial healthcare resources), can cause significant side effects, and has a suboptimal success rate. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) allow ambulatory fluid drainage without hospitalisation, and are increasingly employed for management of malignant effusions. Previous studies have only investigated the length of hospital care immediately related to IPC insertion. Whether IPC management reduces time spent in hospital in the patients' remaining lifespan is unknown. A strategy of malignant effusion management that reduces hospital admission days will allow patients to spend more time outside hospital, reduce costs and save healthcare resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial is a multicentred, randomised trial designed to compare IPC with talc pleurodesis for the management of malignant pleural effusion. This study will randomise 146 adults with malignant pleural effusions (1:1) to IPC management or talc slurry pleurodesis. The primary end point is the total number of days spent in hospital (for any admissions) from treatment procedure to death or end of study follow-up. Secondary end points include hospital days specific to pleural effusion management, adverse events, self-reported symptom and quality-of-life scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Sir Charles Gairdner Group Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the study as have the ethics boards of all the participating hospitals. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry-ACTRN12611000567921; National Institutes of Health-NCT02045121.

Mediastinal abscess after endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a case report and literature review.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive technique that allows lung cancer nodal staging and biopsy of parabronchial and paratracheal tissue. Its simplicity, high diagnostic yield, ability to diagnose both benign and malignant conditions, and exceedingly low complication rate has resulted in rapid widespread adoption by surgeons and physicians. EBUS-TBNA-related complications, however, do occur and need to be considered when assessing the risk-benefit profile of performing the procedure, and if the patient represents with unexpected symptoms after the procedure. We describe a 64-year-old woman who presented with a mediastinal abscess 5 days after EBUS-TBNA. This case demonstrates the importance of considering EBUS-TBNA-related complications to guide relevant imaging decisions and antibiotic choices. We review the published literature regarding infective complications of EBUS-TBNA and propose possible pathophysiologies. These complications are likely to increase in frequency as the technique is more widely adopted.