Challenging Case of Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve-in-Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND A 39-year-old man with a complex valvular history of recurrent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis with 2 surgical mitral valve replacements (in 2016 and 2017) followed by transcatheter mitral valve replacement (in 2019) presented with orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, chest pain, cough, and progressively worsening dyspnea on exertion. CASE REPORT Extensive workup was performed, including transesophageal echocardiogram, which revealed a malfunctioning, severely stenotic bioprosthetic valve. Left and right heart catheterization revealed mild non-obstructive coronary artery disease and severe pulmonary hypertension. Given the patient's complex medical history, he was deemed to be at an elevated risk for repeat sternotomy and repeat valve replacement surgery. Therefore, he underwent a percutaneous transcatheter mitral valve replacement with a 26-mm SAPIEN 3 Edwards valve placed within the previous 29-mm SAPIEN valve. Post-procedural imaging revealed a well-placed valve with an improved mitral valve gradient. CONCLUSIONS This is one of the few rare cases of mitral valve-in-valve via a transcatheter mitral valve replacement approach with successful deployment of a SAPIEN 3 tissue heart valve. The patient experienced significant reversal of heart failure symptoms and improved exertional tolerance following deployment of the valve and was eventually discharged home in a stable condition.

Pharmacotherapy Considerations in Heart Failure with Mildly-Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has been classified using various definitions since its first mention in the literature in 2014. This group was most recently defined in the Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure (HF) as HF with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 41% to 49%. An increasing emphasis has been placed on HFmrEF over the past several years, with many recent publications suggesting that common therapies used in HF with reduced ejection fraction provide benefit in this population as well. Patients with HFmrEF comprise approximately one-quarter of all patients with HF. The lack of authoritative guidance concerning pharmacotherapeutic approaches in these patients leaves a significant portion of HF patients without an evidence-based approach. Although it remains unclear if HFmrEF is simply a transitional state from preserved to reduced ejection fraction, or a distinct phenotype requiring medical optimization, there are clear cardiovascular benefits to managing this subset appropriately. This publication was created to help serve as a resource for clinicians on this evolving subset of HF and aid in preventing the progression of this disease state through improved therapy optimization. The objective of this article is to briefly discuss the epidemiology and pathophysiology of HFmrEF and review the pharmacology and clinical application of therapies for the management of HFmrEF.

Non-ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction Resulting From Thrombotic Saphenous Vein Graft Aneurysm.

Acute coronary syndromes from coronary emboli are rare, but well described in the literature. Saphenous vein grafts (SVG), used in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, are vessels prone to atherosclerotic occlusion and aneurysmal dilation. Descriptive cases of embolization of these atherosclerotic lesions are lacking. Aneurysmal dilation of SVG conduits provides an area of stagnated flow that can harbor thrombi with embolic potential. This case describes a patient with non-ST-segment myocardial infarction possibly resulting from SVG aneurysm thrombus embolism.

Transient Right Bundle Branch Block Resulting From a Blunt Cardiac Injury During a Motor Vehicle Accident.

Blunt chest trauma (BCT) has become increasingly more prevalent in recent years. As a result, the incidence of blunt cardiac injury (BCI), or cardiac or myocardial contusion, has also increased. The sequelae of BCI often are undiagnosed due to variability in the clinical presentation. This case highlights a transient right bundle branch block (RBBB) following a motor vehicle accident (MVA), resulting in BCI. Right-sided cardiac injuries predominate BCI owing to the anterior location of the right ventricle within the thoracic cage; however, the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the electrocardiographic manifestations are vaguely understood. In this case, a 66-year-old female sustained a BCI resulting in a transient RBBB. The patient fully recovered following a three-day hospitalization with complete recovery of normal cardiac conduction.

A Retrospective Analysis of Hospital Electrocardiogram Auto-Populated QT Interval Calculation.

Background The current electrocardiogram (ECG) standard for rate correction of the QT interval (QTc) is a power function known as the Bazett formula (QTcB). QTc formulae are either power functions or linear functions. QTcB is known to lack reliability, as heart rate (HR) rises from or falls below 60 beats per minute (bpm). The American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) have recommended using other formulae in place of QTcB since 2009. The Epic Electronic Health Record System (Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, WI) automatically populates the Fridericia formula (QTcFri) on hospital ECG reports without any provider calculation. Methods We aimed to retrospectively investigate the effect of QTcFri on one year of ECGs in the Epic Electronic Health Record (EHR) at a single tertiary care center. Inclusion criteria for ECG reports specified HR 60-120 bpm without QRS duration > 120 ms. Gathered data from Epic EHR ECG reports included patient age, sex, HR, QRS duration (QRSd), QT interval, QTcB, and QTcFri. EHR documented 61,946 ECG reports for the year, with 44,566 meeting criteria for inclusion. General statistical methods included range, median, mean, and standard deviation. Confidence intervals were assessed to maintain the fidelity of analysis. The normality of data distribution was assessed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov testing. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was then performed to confirm a statistically significant difference between the Bazett and Fridericia formulae. The ∆QTc analysis was conducted on prolonged QTc (males > 450 ms; females > 460 ms) and severely prolonged QTc > 500 ms data subsets. A value of p<0.05 was interpreted as significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software (IBM Statistics, v. 26; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Results The 44,566 ECG reports demonstrated 57% female gender and a mean age of 57 ± 17.5 years. The mean HR was 83 ± 14.7 bpm and the mean ∆QTc was 23 ± 12.9 ms shorter with QTcFri. Mean data showed minimal variation between sexes: age, heart rate, uncorrected QT, QTcB, QTcFri, and ∆QTc varied by less than 2%. Mean QRS varied by 4% between sexes. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test revealed 44,127 ranks with a negative difference, 0 ranks with a positive difference, and 439 ties, p <0.001 (99% CI: 22.5 ms, 23.0 ms). QTcB identified 37.4% (16665/44566) ECGs prolonged. Using QTcFri, 21% (9371/44566) of the total ECGs corrected to normal QTc (<450 ms (men) and 460 ms (women)). QTcFri use reduced the number of ECG reports with QTc > 500 ms by 57.3%. A total of 125 ECG reports, 117 females and eight males, corrected to normal gender-specific QTc with QTcFri. The mean decrease in QTc with the Fridericia formula when QTcB > 500 ms was 31 ± 14.5 ms (99% CI: 30.4 ms, 31.7 ms). Conclusion Our data from the Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis indicated that the EHR QTcFri analysis yields a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in QTc calculation of 22 ms over 44,566 ECG reports. The data showed a 21% reduction in inaccurately documented test results. The utilization of this resource will provide the most accurate and clinically relevant data to inform clinical decision-making. Accurate QT interval calculation will better inform downstream clinical decision-making through a wider scope of therapeutic intervention. This analysis is readily available to clinicians without calculation and its awareness will benefit patient care.

The Impact of Interprofessional Monitoring and Education on the Usage of Systemic Glucocorticoids in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective, Medication Use Review.

Background Systemic corticosteroid therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations is routine in clinical practice, however, dosing is variable. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) panel recommends a short course of systemic corticosteroids for acute COPD exacerbation treatment. Despite these recommendations, institutions continue to use higher doses and longer durations of systemic corticosteroid therapies. Methods This single-center, retrospective, cohort study evaluated systemic corticosteroid use in inpatient treatment of COPD exacerbations. Data were collected on patients with a diagnosis of COPD exacerbation from October 2017 to February 2018 in both the control and education groups. An interprofessional, learner-centric, quality improvement, educational seminar was performed. Providers were given accompanying pocket reference material for improved adherence to GOLD guidelines for the management of acute COPD exacerbations. Results Of the 137 charts reviewed in the control group, 130 of 137 patients (94.9%) received systemic corticosteroid doses exceeding GOLD guideline recommendations. These patients received an average daily dose of 147.5 mg of prednisone equivalents. These patients also experienced more adverse drug reactions as compared to their post-intervention counterparts. The 105 charts examined post-educational intervention revealed 47 of 105 patients (44.8%) received GOLD guideline-directed doses of systemic corticosteroids. This was an improvement from 2.9% (4 of 137) in the control group (p-value < 0.001). The average daily dose decreased to 58 mg daily (p-value < 0.001), and the number of doses over the recommended 40 mg of prednisone equivalents (54 of 105) was a 43.5% reduction (p-value < 0.001). Length of stay also decreased in the education group from 6.1 +/- 4.1 to 4.7 +/- 2.8 days (p-value 0.009). The 30-day readmission rate, however, was not statistically different between the two groups, 31.4% pre- and 21.0% post-educational intervention (p-value 0.098). Conclusions The interprofessional education seminar and pocket reference sheet realigned clinical practice with guideline-based therapy in this tertiary care, community hospital. These data validate that learner-centric innovation will benefit patient outcomes and improve the educational potential of the interdisciplinary rounding team.