ABSTRACT
We aimed to determine whether obtaining two blood cultures (BCs) instead of one improved the detection of bloodstream infections (BSIs) in children. For this descriptive study, we used surveillance data collected in 2019-2021 from all Israeli hospitals serving children. The sample included 178,702 culturing episodes. One BC was taken in 90.1% of all episodes and 98.2% of episodes in the emergency department. A true pathogen was detected in 1687/160,964 (1.0%) of single-culture episodes and 1567/17,738 (8.9%) of two-culture episodes (p < 0.001). The yield was significantly different even when considering only the first BC in two-culture episodes: 1.0% vs. 7.5%. Among 1576 two-culture episodes that were positive for a true pathogen, the pathogen was detected only in the second culture in 252 (16.0%). We estimated that if a second culture had been taken in all episodes, an additional 343 BSIs by a true pathogen would have been detected. Among 1086 two-culture episodes with commensal bacteria, the second BC was sterile in 530 (48.8%), suggesting contamination. A commensal was isolated in 3094/4781 (64.7%) positive single-culture episodes, which could represent BSI or contamination. The yield of a single BC bottle was low, reflecting both lower sensitivity of a single bottle and the taking of single bottles in patients with a low probability of BSI.
ABSTRACT
Importance: Blood culturing is a critical diagnostic procedure affecting patient outcomes and antibiotic stewardship. Although there are standards for blood culturing, the process is not often measured. Objectives: To evaluate processes related to the diagnosis of bloodstream infection and compare them with best practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: A quality improvement study using laboratory data from January 1 to June 30, 2019, was conducted in 28 (96.6%) Israeli acute care hospitals. All blood cultures (BCs) performed on samples from adults and children in a period of 147 hospital-months were analyzed. Data analysis was performed from April 12, 2021, to September 9, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: True pathogen detection rate, contamination rate, proportion of adults with blood cultures performed, proportion of adult culturing episodes with only 1 set or bottle used, and median time of steps from sample collection to pathogen identification. Results: The data set consisted of 348â¯987 BC bottles. Bloodstream infection was detected in a median of 6.7% (IQR, 5.8%-8.2%) of adult culturing episodes and 1.1% (IQR, 0.7%-1.9%) of pediatric episodes. Eleven of 27 hospitals (40.7%) with adult patients met the standard of a contamination rate of less than 3% and only 2 hospitals (7.4%) met the more stringent standard of less than or equal to 1% contamination rate. The percentage of adults with blood cultures ranged from 2.7% to 29.0% (mean [SD], 15.7% [6.0%]). There was an association between sampling rate and pathogen detection until BCs were performed in 17% of adult admissions. The percentage of solitary BCs ranged from 47.8% to 94.4%. An estimated 1745 of 7436 (23.5%) adult bloodstream infections went undetected because solitary BCs were performed, anaerobic bottles were not used, or BCs were not performed. Median processing time was 51.2 (IQR, 33.9-78.0) hours, 3 times the optimal time: 4.4 (IQR, 1.7-12.5) hours for the preanalytical stage, 15.9 (IQR, 10.2-23.6) hours from incubation to growth detection, 4.5 (IQR, 1.5-10.7) hours from detection to Gram stain, and 30.9 (IQR, 22.0-41.9) hours from detection to isolate identification. An 8.6-hour delay was related to off-hours operating of laboratories. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that the multistep process of blood culturing is not managed comprehensively in Israel, leading to poor clinical practices and delayed results.
