Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 127: 34-38, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35594982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Investigation of a COVID-19 super-spreading event involving both beta and delta variants of SARS-CoV-2, following a choir in a mental health centre. METHODS: An epidemiological and biological (RT-PCR, mutations screening and sequencing) investigation was carried out to identify the chains of transmission. A morbidity and mortality review was performed using ALARM root causes analysis to understand how this superspreading event could have taken place. RESULTS: On May 25 and 26, 2021, all 13 choir participants were screened. Of these, eight were positive. None of them was vaccinated. Biological results suggested seven cases of delta variants (three confirmed by sequencing) and one case of beta variant. The screening of 141 contact individuals identified 21 subsequent cases with a suspected delta variant and two cases of suspected beta variant. Since the two index cases had similar Ct during the choir, this suggests different spreading abilities. The contributing factors were multiple, including underestimation of infectious risks by the social therapy team in relation to low individual and collective perceived vulnerability CONCLUSION: HCPs involved in sociotherapy must be aware of, and trained to mitigate, the risk of superspreading event. Conventional distancing and good natural ventilation appear to not be enough to prevent spread of more transmissible variants of SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Humans , Mental Health , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 118: 27-31, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34534602

ABSTRACT

This study assessed the hand hygiene performance in French nursing homes using the consumption of alcohol-based hand rubs (AHRs) as a surrogate. Nursing homes from the 17 French regions were contacted to collect their AHR consumption and occupancy in 2018 and 2019. A total of 1290 nursing homes from 15 French regions participated in the survey. The estimated median number of hand hygiene actions per resident-day was 1.48 (interquartile range: 1.04-2.03) in 2018 and 1.60 (1.10-2.26) in 2019. A significantly higher AHR consumption was observed in public nursing homes with an infection control team or link nurse.


Subject(s)
Hand Hygiene , Ethanol , Hand , Humans , Infection Control , Nursing Homes
3.
Infect Dis Now ; 51(2): 170-178, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33068683

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: While regional monitoring of antibiotic use has decreased since 2011 by 3.2%, in some healthcare facilities a significant increase (+43%) has occurred. The purpose of this study was to assess regional antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) compliance with national guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2015, 26 healthcare facilities, both public and private, were requested to audit five items: utilization of antibiotic prophylaxis, the antimicrobial agent (the molecule) administered, time between injection and incision, initial dose, number of intraoperative and postoperative additional doses. Seven surgical procedures were selected for assessment: appendicectomy (APP), cataract (CAT), cesarean section (CES), colorectal cancer surgery (CCR), hysterectomy (HYS), total hip arthroplasty (THA) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). A statistical analysis of the 2303 records included was carried out. RESULTS: The general rate of antibiotic prophylaxis compliance was 64%. The antimicrobial agent used and initial dose were in compliance with the guidelines for 93% and 97.4% of cases respectively, and administration of antibiotic prophylaxis was achieved 60minutes before incision in 77.6% of the records included. Regarding gastrointestinal surgery, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was used in 32% of patients. In 26% of appendectomy files, administration occurred after incision, and one out of two files showed non-complaint perioperative and postoperative consumption. CONCLUSION: Compliance with nationwide ABP guidelines is in need of pronounced improvement, especially with regard to time interval between injection and incision and the molecule prescribed. An action plan based on specific recommendations addressed to each establishment and an updated regionwide ABP protocol are aimed at achieving better and reduced consumption of antimicrobial agents.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Appendectomy/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Cesarean Section/methods , Clinical Audit , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/methods
4.
Infect Dis Now ; 51(3): 247-252, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33164835

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: High-risk isolation units (HRIU) house patients at high risk of transmitting infectious agents, notably patients with suspected viral hemorrhagic fever or smear-positive tuberculosis. Admission to HRIU can alter the quality of care and impact patients' and healthcare workers' (HCWs) anxiety and dissatisfaction. METHODS: The Infectious Diseases Department of the Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital in Paris houses a 7-bed HRIU. We conducted a qualitative study based on individual semi-structured interviews to assess the perceptions of both patients and HCWs. RESULTS: We interviewed 14 patients and 16 HCWs routinely working in the HRIU. All 8 patients subject to isolation precautions and 1 of the 6 patients not subject to isolation precautions expressed a negative representation of the room with a feeling of confinement, stigma, and mistrust. They also reported a lack of information from healthcare staff and a need for entertainment, activities, and visits from relatives. HCWs did not like working in this unit because of the anteroom's technical constraints and a loss of frequent contact with patients. They also expressed a feeling of insecurity working in these units despite the use of interphones. CONCLUSION: Placing patients in an HRIU not only affects their emotions, but also impacts HCWs both emotionally and organizationally. Alert systems, intercoms, and videoconferencing systems can improve safety and security as well as exchanges with patients and their relatives. Psychological support is needed for patients who are subject to isolation precautions and for their attending HCWs.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Health Personnel/psychology , Patient Isolation/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospital Design and Construction , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Interviews as Topic , Middle Aged , Paris , Patient Safety , Perception , Qualitative Research , Quality of Health Care
5.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(2): 332-334, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805310

ABSTRACT

The objective was to describe French hospital nasal screening and decolonization procedures before clean surgery procedures. Information for participants was sent to the French Society for Infection Control members in June 2018. Seventy hospitals participated in the survey; 40% (N = 28) declared having institutional decolonization procedures: 64% (N = 18) in orthopaedic and 56% (N = 15) in cardiac surgeries. All hospitals used mupirocin for nasal decolonization and body decolonization with chlorhexidine (N = 16) or povidone iodine (N = 10). This study is the first to be performed in France giving information in this field. Screening/decolonization procedures are heterogeneous and the evaluation of their clinical impact remains complex.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Carrier State/microbiology , Decontamination/methods , Nose/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , France , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Mupirocin/administration & dosage , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Povidone-Iodine/administration & dosage , Qualitative Research , Staphylococcus aureus , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
6.
Int J Infect Dis ; 100: 278-282, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32860949

ABSTRACT

Research, collaboration, and knowledge exchange are critical to global efforts to tackle antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Different healthcare economies are faced with different challenges in implementing effective strategies to address AMR. Building effective capacity for research to inform AMR-related strategies and policies is recognised as an important contributor to success. Interdisciplinary, intersector, as well as international collaborations are needed to span global to local efforts to tackle AMR. The development of reciprocal, long-term partnerships between collaborators in high-income and in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) needs to be built on principles of capacity building. Using case studies spanning local and international research collaborations to codesign, implement, and evaluate strategies to tackle AMR, we have evaluated and build upon the ESSENCE criteria for capacity building in LMICs. The first case study describes the local codesign and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the state of Kerala in India. The second case study describes an international research collaboration investigating AMR surgical patient pathways in India, the UK, and South Africa. We describe the steps undertaken to develop robust, agile, and flexible AMS research and implementation teams. Notably, investing in capacity building ensured that the programmes described in these case studies were sustained through the current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus pandemic. Describing the strategies adopted by a local and an international collaboration to tackle AMR, we provide a model for capacity building in LMICs that can support sustainable and agile AMS programmes.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Biomedical Research , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Capacity Building , Humans , Income , India , International Cooperation , South Africa , United Kingdom
8.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(10): 1300-1309, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32061795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) allows the analysis of complex and large data sets and has the potential to improve health care. The clinical microbiology laboratory, at the interface of clinical practice and diagnostics, is of special interest for the development of ML systems. AIMS: This narrative review aims to explore the current use of ML In clinical microbiology. SOURCES: References for this review were identified through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, biorXiv, arXiV, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore Digital Library up to November 2019. CONTENT: We found 97 ML systems aiming to assist clinical microbiologists. Overall, 82 ML systems (85%) targeted bacterial infections, 11 (11%) parasitic infections, nine (9%) viral infections and three (3%) fungal infections. Forty ML systems (41%) focused on microorganism detection, identification and quantification, 36 (37%) evaluated antimicrobial susceptibility, and 21 (22%) targeted the diagnosis, disease classification and prediction of clinical outcomes. The ML systems used very diverse data sources: 21 (22%) used genomic data of microorganisms, 19 (20%) microbiota data obtained by metagenomic sequencing, 19 (20%) analysed microscopic images, 17 (18%) spectroscopy data, eight (8%) targeted gene sequencing, six (6%) volatile organic compounds, four (4%) photographs of bacterial colonies, four (4%) transcriptome data, three (3%) protein structure, and three (3%) clinical data. Most systems used data from high-income countries (n = 71, 73%) but a significant number used data from low- and middle-income countries (n = 36, 37%). Performance measures were reported for the 97 ML systems, but no article described their use in clinical practice or reported impact on processes or clinical outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: In clinical microbiology, ML has been used with various data sources and diverse practical applications. The evaluation and implementation processes represent the main gap in existing ML systems, requiring a focus on their interpretability and potential integration into real-world settings.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Services , Data Analysis , Information Technology , Machine Learning , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycoses/diagnosis , Mycoses/therapy , Parasitic Diseases/diagnosis , Parasitic Diseases/therapy , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/therapy
9.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(5): 584-595, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31539636

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) is a growing field in medicine. This narrative review describes the current body of literature on ML for clinical decision support in infectious diseases (ID). OBJECTIVES: We aim to inform clinicians about the use of ML for diagnosis, classification, outcome prediction and antimicrobial management in ID. SOURCES: References for this review were identified through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, biorXiv, ACM Digital Library, arXiV and IEEE Xplore Digital Library up to July 2019. CONTENT: We found 60 unique ML-clinical decision support systems (ML-CDSS) aiming to assist ID clinicians. Overall, 37 (62%) focused on bacterial infections, 10 (17%) on viral infections, nine (15%) on tuberculosis and four (7%) on any kind of infection. Among them, 20 (33%) addressed the diagnosis of infection, 18 (30%) the prediction, early detection or stratification of sepsis, 13 (22%) the prediction of treatment response, four (7%) the prediction of antibiotic resistance, three (5%) the choice of antibiotic regimen and two (3%) the choice of a combination antiretroviral therapy. The ML-CDSS were developed for intensive care units (n = 24, 40%), ID consultation (n = 15, 25%), medical or surgical wards (n = 13, 20%), emergency department (n = 4, 7%), primary care (n = 3, 5%) and antimicrobial stewardship (n = 1, 2%). Fifty-three ML-CDSS (88%) were developed using data from high-income countries and seven (12%) with data from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The evaluation of ML-CDSS was limited to measures of performance (e.g. sensitivity, specificity) for 57 ML-CDSS (95%) and included data in clinical practice for three (5%). IMPLICATIONS: Considering comprehensive patient data from socioeconomically diverse healthcare settings, including primary care and LMICs, may improve the ability of ML-CDSS to suggest decisions adapted to various clinical contexts. Currents gaps identified in the evaluation of ML-CDSS must also be addressed in order to know the potential impact of such tools for clinicians and patients.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Communicable Diseases/therapy , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Machine Learning , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Artificial Intelligence , Clinical Decision-Making , Communicable Diseases/classification , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/classification , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/statistics & numerical data , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/trends , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Machine Learning/classification , Machine Learning/statistics & numerical data , Machine Learning/trends , Patient Outcome Assessment , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/therapy
10.
J Hosp Infect ; 104(3): 328-331, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711792

ABSTRACT

The implementation of the national 'Getting It Right First Time' was assessed by interviewing six surgeons involved at various levels in surgical site infection (SSI) audit. The positive impacts were to create new professional collaboration, improve stakeholder engagement, and increase the profile of SSIs. One particular knowledge gap highlighted was that some participants had been unaware until that point of the criteria for diagnosing an SSI. The quality of data collected was felt to be poor due to methodological flaws. The audit was described as highly time-consuming and unsustainable if leaning on junior surgeons, without protected time and designated responsibility.


Subject(s)
Surgeons/psychology , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Qualitative Research
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31749961

ABSTRACT

Background: Much effort has been made over the last two decades to educate and train healthcare professionals working on antimicrobial resistance in French hospitals. However, little has been done in France to assess perceptions, attitudes and knowledge regarding multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) and, more globally, these have never been evaluated in a large-scale population of medical and non-medical healthcare workers (HCWs). Our aim was to explore awareness among HCWs by evaluating their knowledge of MDROs and the associated control measures, by comparing perceptions between professional categories and by studying the impact of training and health beliefs. Methods: A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted in 58 randomly selected French healthcare facilities with questionnaires including professional and demographic characteristics, and knowledge and perception of MDRO transmission and control. A knowledge score was calculated and used in a logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with higher knowledge of MDROs, and the association between knowledge and perception. Results: Between June 2014 and March 2016, 8716/11,753 (participation rate, 74%) questionnaires were completed. The mean knowledge score was 4.7/8 (SD: 1.3) and 3.6/8 (SD: 1.4) in medical and non-medical HCWs, respectively. Five variables were positively associated with higher knowledge: working in a university hospital (adjusted odds ratio, 1.41, 95% CI 1.16-1.70); age classes 26-35 years (1.43, 1.23-1.6) and 36-45 years (1.19, 1.01-1.40); medical professional status (3.7, 3.09-4.44), working in an intensive care unit (1.28, 1.06-1.55), and having been trained on control of antimicrobial resistance (1.31, 1.16-1.48). After adjustment for these variables, greater knowledge was significantly associated with four cognitive factors: perceived susceptibility, attitude toward hand hygiene, self-efficacy, and motivation. Conclusions: We found a low level of MDRO awareness and knowledge of associated control measures among French HCWs. Training on hand hygiene and measures to control MDRO spread may be helpful in shaping beliefs and perceptions on MDRO control among other possible associated factors. Messages should be tailored to professional status and their perception. Other approaches should be designed, with more effective methods of training and cognitive interventions. Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT02265471. Registered 16 October 2014 - Retrospectively registered.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/transmission , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Health Personnel , Adult , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Facilities , Humans , Infection Control , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Med Mal Infect ; 49(6): 447-455, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30914214

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Communication represents a key component of the control of highly drug-resistant bacteria (HDRB) in healthcare settings. This survey assessed communication strategies developed and adopted in a large hospital network. METHODS: An online survey was sent to 83 infection control specialists working in hospitals of the Pays de la Loire region, France, in June 2016. Internal and external systems of identification and communication of HDRB status (colonized and contact patients) were assessed at the following steps of the hospital pathway: patient admission, during the stay, at discharge, and at readmission. RESULTS: Sixty-one hospitals (73%) participated in the survey: 31 (51%) had recently managed colonized patients and 51 (93%) had recently managed contact patients. At patient admission, 28 (46%) hospitals had an identification system for repatriated patients. During hospital stay, the colonized or contact status was informed in computerized patient records for 47/57 (82%) and 43 (75%) hospitals, respectively. At patient discharge, 56/61 (92%) hospitals declared transmitting the HDRB status to the downstream ward. Twenty-six and 25/60 (43% and 42%) hospitals had an automated alert system at readmission of colonized or contact patients, respectively. This strategy met the expectations of 15/61 (26%) infection control specialists. CONCLUSION: Efforts are still required in terms of communication for HDRB control. Sharing experiences and tools developed by hospitals may be beneficial for the entire hospital network.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Hospitals , Infection Control/organization & administration , Infection Control/standards , Interdisciplinary Communication , Antimicrobial Stewardship/organization & administration , Antimicrobial Stewardship/standards , Communication , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , France/epidemiology , Hospitals/standards , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Medical Record Linkage/methods , Medical Record Linkage/standards , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/organization & administration , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/standards , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/statistics & numerical data
13.
J Hosp Infect ; 101(2): 183-187, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30389597

ABSTRACT

Three outbreaks of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in three nursing homes in western France were retrospectively assessed. In all, ten cases of colonization or infection with CPE were detected upon admission in neighbouring hospitals. Antibiotic consumption or high frailty was infrequent among them. Nursing homes should be included in a regional strategy to limit CPE spread.


Subject(s)
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Disease Outbreaks , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Nursing Homes , Retrospective Studies
14.
J Hosp Infect ; 102(1): 31-36, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30557588

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The spread of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) in healthcare environments has become a major public health threat in recent years. AIM: To assess how healthcare workers (HCWs) manage excreta and the possible association with the incidence of ESBL-PE. METHODS: Eight hundred HCWs and 74 nurse-supervisors were questioned through two self-report questionnaires in order to assess their knowledge and practices, and to determine the equipment utilized for excreta management in 74 healthcare departments. Performance on equipment utilized, knowledge and practices were scored as good (score of 1), intermediate (score of 2) or poor (score of 3) on the basis of pre-established thresholds. Linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between HCWs' knowledge/practices and the incidence of ESBL-PE. FINDINGS: Six hundred and eighty-eight HCWs (86%) and all nurse-supervisors participated in the survey. The proportions of respondents scoring 1, 2 and 3 were: 14.8%, 71.6% and 17.6% for equipment; 30.1%, 40.6 % and 29.3% for knowledge; and 2.0%, 71.9% and 26.1% for practices, respectively. The single regression mathematic model highlighted that poor practices (score of 3) among HCWs was significantly associated with increased incidence of ESBL-PE (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: A positive correlation was found between HCWs' practices for managing excreta and the incidence of ESBL-PE, especially in surgical units. There is an urgent need for development of public health efforts to enhance knowledge and practices of HCWs to better control the spread of multi-drug-resistant bacteria, and these should be integrated within infection control programmes.


Subject(s)
Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/prevention & control , Enterobacteriaceae/enzymology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/psychology , Infection Control/methods , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Health Services Research , Humans , Models, Statistical , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Prog Urol ; 28(17): 943-952, 2018 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30501940

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to issue clinical practice guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis in urodynamics (urodynamic studies, UDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical practice guidelines were provided using a formal consensus method. Guidelines proposals were drew up by a multidisciplinary experts group (pilot group = steering group), then rated by a panel of 12 experts (rating group) using a formal consensus method, and then peer reviewed by a reviewing/reading group of experts (different from the rating group). RESULTS: Urine (bacterial) culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing is recommended for all patients before UDS (strong agreement). In patients with no neurologic disease, the risk factors for tract urinary infection (UTI) after UDS are age > 70 years, recurrent UTI, and post-void residual volume > 100ml. In patients with neurologic disease, the risk factors for UTI after UDS are recurrent UTI, vesicoureteral reflux, and intermicturition pressure > 40cmH2O. If the urine culture is negative before UDS and there is no risk factor for UTI, antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended (Strong agreement). If the urine culture is negative before UDS, but there are one or more risk factors for UTI, antibiotic prophylaxis is optional. If antibiotic prophylaxis is initiated, a single oral dose (3g) of fosfomycin-tromethamine two hours before UDS is recommended (Strong agreement). If there is bacterial colonization on UCB before UDS, antibiotic therapy is optional (Undecided). If prescribed, it should be adapted to the antimicrobial susceptibility of the identified bacterium or bacteria, started the day before and stopped after UDS (except for fosfomycin-tromethamine: a single dose the day before UDS is necessary and sufficient) (Strong agreement). In the event of UTI before UDS, the UTI should be treated and UDS postponed (Strong agreement). The proposed recommendations should not be changed for patients with a hip or knee replacement (Strong agreement). No antibiotic prophylaxis of bacterial endocarditis is necessary, including in high-risk patients with valvular heart disease (Strong agreement). CONCLUSION: These new guidelines should help to harmonize clinical practice and limit exposure to antibiotics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/standards , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urodynamics/drug effects , Aged , Consensus , Expert Testimony , France , Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology
16.
J Hosp Infect ; 100(4): 378-385, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29906490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The rise in antimicrobial resistance has highlighted the importance of surgical site infection (SSI) prevention with effective surveillance strategies playing a key role in improving patient safety. AIM: To map national needs and priorities for SSI surveillance against current national surveillance activity. METHODS: This study analysed SSI surveillance in National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England covering 23 surgical procedures. Data collected were: (i) annual number of procedures, (ii) SSI rates from national reports, (iii) national reporting requirement (mandatory, voluntary, not offered), (iv) priority ranking from a survey of 84 English NHS hospitals, (v) excess length of stay and costs from the literature. The relationships between estimated SSI burden, national surveillance activity, and hospital-reported priorities were explored with descriptive and univariate analyses. FINDINGS: Among the 23 surgical categories analysed, top priority ranking by hospitals was associated only with current surveillance (r = 0.76, P < 0.01) and mandatory reporting (33% vs 8 and 4%, P = 0.04). Percentage of hospitals undertaking surveillance, mandatory reporting, and the selection of priorities did not match SSI burden. Large bowel surgery (LBS, voluntary) and caesarean section (not offered) were the two highest contributors of total SSIs per annum, with 39,000 (38%) and 17,000 (16%) respectively, while the four orthopaedic categories (all mandatory) contributed 5000 (5%). LBS also had the highest associated costs (£119 million per annum). CONCLUSION: Current surveillance and future priorities were not associated with SSI rate, volume, or cost to hospitals. The two highest contributors of SSIs and related costs have no (caesarean section) or limited (LBS) coverage by national surveillance.


Subject(s)
Epidemiological Monitoring , Infection Control/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , England/epidemiology , Humans , Infection Control/trends , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
J Hosp Infect ; 100(3): 322-328, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29733924

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sternal wound infection (SWI) after cardiac surgery is a severe complication. Among preventive measures, pre-operative decolonization of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus has recently been shown to be beneficial. This quasi-experimental study assessed the effect of decolonization on the incidence of S. aureus-associated SWI based on 19 years of prospective surveillance. METHODS: Segmented negative binomial regression was used to analyse the change over time in the incidence of S. aureus mediastinitis requiring re-operation after cardiac surgery in a French university hospital between 1996 and 2014. Universal nasal decolonization with mupirocin was introduced in December 2001. The association between pre-operative nasal carriage and SWI due to S. aureus was analysed between 2006 and 2012. RESULTS: Among 17,261 patients who underwent a cardiac surgical procedure, 565 developed SWI (3.3%), which was caused by S. aureus in 181 cases (1%). The incidence of mediastinitis caused by S. aureus decreased significantly over the study period (1.43% in 1996-2001 vs 0.61% and 0.64% in 2002-2005 and 2006-2014, respectively; P<0.001). In segmented analysis, there was a significant break in 2002, corresponding to the introduction of decolonization. Despite this intervention, pre-operative nasal carriage remained a significant risk factor for S. aureus mediastinitis (adjusted odds ratio 2.2; 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.2), as were obesity, critical pre-operative status, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and combined surgery with valve replacement and CABG. CONCLUSION: Universal nasal decolonization before cardiac surgery was effective in decreasing the incidence of mediastinitis caused by S. aureus. Nasal carriage of S. aureus remained a risk factor for S. aureus-associated SWI.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Carrier State/drug therapy , Mupirocin/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Thoracic Surgery , Administration, Topical , Aged , Female , France , Hospitals, University , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Hosp Infect ; 99(4): 422-426, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29684421

ABSTRACT

Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (OXA-48 CPE) were identified in five patients who underwent an endoscopy with the same duodenoscope in October 2015. The endoscope was the only epidemiological link between these cases. A transient contamination of the duodenoscope following a failure in the disinfection process may have been the cause of transmission.


Subject(s)
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Disease Outbreaks , Disease Transmission, Infectious , Duodenoscopy/adverse effects , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella Infections/transmission , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Male
20.
Int J Infect Dis ; 60: 29-34, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28483725

ABSTRACT

Optimizing antibiotic prescribing across the surgical pathway (before, during, and after surgery) is a key aspect of tackling important drivers of antimicrobial resistance and simultaneously decreasing the burden of infection at the global level. In the UK alone, 10 million patients undergo surgery every year, which is equivalent to 60% of the annual hospital admissions having a surgical intervention. The overwhelming majority of surgical procedures require effectively limited delivery of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infections. Evidence from around the world indicates that antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis are administered ineffectively, or are extended for an inappropriate duration of time postoperatively. Ineffective antibiotic prophylaxis can contribute to the development of surgical site infections (SSIs), which represent a significant global burden of disease. The World Health Organization estimates SSI rates of up to 50% in postoperative surgical patients (depending on the type of surgery), with a particular problem in low- and middle-income countries, where SSIs are the most frequently reported healthcare-associated infections. Across European hospitals, SSIs alone comprise 19.6% of all healthcare-acquired infections. Much of the scientific research in infection management in surgery is related to infection prevention and control in the operating room, surgical prophylaxis, and the management of SSIs, with many studies focusing on infection within the 30-day postoperative period. However it is important to note that SSIs represent only one of the many types of infection that can occur postoperatively. This article provides an overview of the surgical pathway and considers infection management and antibiotic prescribing at each step of the pathway. The aim was to identify the implications for research and opportunities for system improvement.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/standards , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Checklist , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Culture , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...