Is Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Needed in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy? A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Although rare, deep vein thrombosis is a potentially life-threatening complication of knee arthroscopy. There are scanty literature analysing deep vein thrombosis after arthroscopy in Nepal. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy without chemoprophylaxis postoperatively at 2 weeks and 6 weeks, respectively. The study also aimed to estimate the risk of deep vein thrombosis in these patients by using Caprini Risk Assessment Model. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted at AKB center, B and B Hospital, Gwarko, Lalitpur, over a period of 16 months. All patients who underwent arthroscopy knee surgeries fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis as diagnosed by compression color-coded ultrasonography of the popliteal vein and calf vein at 2 weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcome measure was the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in the risk groups according to Caprini Risk Assessment Model. RESULTS: Out of 612 patients who underwent arthroscopic knee surgeries during the study period, 2 patients (0.33%) developed deep vein thrombosis at 6 weeks follow-up as diagnosed with ultrasonography of the popliteal and calf veins. The prevalence rate in high-risk group was 0.33% (1 in 307) and in very high-risk group was 5.88% (1 in 17). CONCLUSIONS: There was a low prevalence of deep vein thrombosis without chemoprophylaxis following knee arthroscopy in our study. There was higher prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in very high-risk group patients, so close monitoring of such patients during follow-up is recommended.

Semitendinosus Autograft Transplant for Medial Meniscus.

Treatment of meniscal tears has evolved over the last few decades, and preservation has now become the gold standard of treatment. Advancements in repair technique have extended the indication of repair. However, meniscectomy has to be performed in some situations. In these situations, meniscal allograft transplantation is considered the gold standard. But allografts are not available in every part of the world. Collagen implants and synthetic polymers are also advocated. But again, its limited research, availability, and high cost have restricted its widespread use. Many authors have advocated autograft transplantation, but there are no long-term results, and there is a lack of uniform surgical techniques. There is a technique described for lateral meniscus, but a medial meniscus autograft transplant technique is not very well elaborated. In this report, we aimed to describe a medial meniscus replacement technique using a hamstring autograft.

"Make and Use" All Suture Anchor-A Cost-Effective Method of Making an All-Suture Anchor.

All-suture anchors (ASA) are newer anchors that anchor soft tissues to the bone. It has several biomechanical and clinical advantages; however, the high cost of this anchor limits its use in low socioeconomic countries. The cost of the anchor dramatically increases the cost of surgery; hence, acceptance of surgery is also affected if patients have to pay their expenditure from their pocket. We have designed a simple, cost-effective method of making an ASA, which can be made instantly and used during surgery; hence, the name "make-and-use anchor." To make this anchor, few high-strength sutures are required. Over the suture, a sleeve of suture was created using an Ethibond. This sleeve will create a "ball" after deployment under the cortical bone, which provides anchorage to the sutures serving as an anchor. This anchor can be deployed both in the pull-in and push-in methods. This technical note aims to share the technique of making this cost-effective anchor, which is made instantly using locally available suture materials and can be used in various surgeries requiring anchors.

Positive Pivot Shift Test among Patients with Displaced Anterior Tibial Spine Fractures Undergoing Arthroscopic Fixation in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Understanding of displaced anterior tibial spine fractures has evolved over the years and is now considered to be anterior cruciate ligament avulsion injuries rather than intra-articular fractures. However, there are very few studies available evaluating the presence or absence of a pivot shift test, which is specific in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, in patients with anterior tibial spine fractures. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of the positive pivot shift test among patients with displaced anterior tibial spine fractures undergoing arthroscopic fixation in a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among patients presented with displaced anterior tibial spine fractures undergoing arthroscopic fixation. The data were collected between 1 January 2020 and 30 May 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: IRC_2019_11_09_1). All patients who presented with displaced anterior tibial spine fractures undergoing arthroscopic fixation were included in the study and those who did not provide consent were excluded. The pivot test was performed under anaesthesia. Point estimate and 90% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Among 48 patients, pivot shift was positive in 36 (75%) (64.75-85.25, 90% Confidence Interval). The mean age of the participants was 28.97±11.16 years, 21 (58.33%) were males and 15 (41.66%) were females. Conclusions: The prevalence of positive pivot shift test under anaesthesia in patients with displaced anterior tibial spine fractures undergoing arthroscopic fixation was higher than other studies done in similar settings. Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; arthroscopy; knee fractures; physical examination.

Ramp Tear among Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Tertiary Care Centre.

Introduction: Ramp tear is a specific injury that affects the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and its meniscosynovial or meniscocapsular attachments. The actual prevalence of ramp lesion is unknown due to the high probability of misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis caused by the low sensitivity of imaging modalities and poor visualization during arthroscopy. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of ramp tear among patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after getting ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee. Data from 1 March 2019 to 31 December 2022 was collected between 1 May 2023 to 30 May 2023 from medical records. The study included all patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients with a previous history of medial meniscus injury or repair and undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were excluded. Convenience sampling method was used. The point estimate was calculated at a 95% Confidence Interval. Results: Out of 412 patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 53 (12.86%) (9.63-16.09, 95% Confidence Interval) had ramp tears. The mean age of patients with ramp tears was 28.64±7.57 years. Among 53 patients, 42 (79.24%) were male and 11 (20.75%) were female. Conclusions: The prevalence of ramp tears in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a tertiary care centre was found to be lower than other studies done in other international studies. Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament injuries; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; arthroscopy.

Epidemiological profile of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a tertiary referral trauma center of Nepal.

BACKGROUND: Sports related injuries are the leading cause of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) tear in the Western world. Although professional and recreational sporting activities are increasing in Nepal, they are not as common and prevalent in comparison to western world. In contrast, Road Traffic Accident (RTA) is a very common cause of knee injuries in Nepal. Although there are some studies from Nepal mentioning Road Traffic Accidents (RTAs) as the most common cause of ACL injury, no specific studies have primarily investigated the epidemiological and demographic profile of ACL injured patients from this region. we aimed to understand the epidemiological and demographic profile of ACL injured patients and evaluate the mode of injury in a tertiary referral trauma center of Nepal. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study of a hospital cohort conducted from February 2018 to January 2020. Electronic details were retrieved, telephone interviews conducted and data analysis was done using descriptive analysis on the patients from the fore mentioned dates to complete demographic and epidemiological information. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these, 120 patients (50.6%) fell into the age group of 15-30 years with a male to female ratio of 2.7:1. A RTA was the most common cause of ACL injury (38.8%), followed by sports-related injuries in 33.3% and falls in 16.5% of patients. The most common mode of RTA was a two-wheeler accident, and football was the most common sport causing ACL injuries. Sports injury was more common in patients below 30 years of age (OR = 3.5, 95% CI [2.2, 5.7]), whereas RTA was more common in patients above 30 years of age. Sports was the cause of ACL injury in 55.5% of students and RTAs was the commonest cause of ACL injury in office workers. CONCLUSION: Overall males were more frequently injured than females. Road traffic accidents were the most common cause of ACL injury in our subset of patients. Two-wheeler riders were the most commonly injured patients. Sport was the commonest cause of ACL injury in patients below 30 years, and RTA was common in patients above 30 years of age. Sports were the commonest cause of ACL injury in students, while RTA was the most common cause in office workers.

Remnant Tensioning Through Pullout Sutures From the Femoral Tunnel During Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Even after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear, its remnant retains the vascularized synovial sheets, fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and various mechanoreceptors within it. The aim of preserving the remnant is to retain these components during ACL reconstruction. In the recent past, there has been an increasing trend towards preserving remnants during ACL reconstruction. Although preserving remnants have physiological advantages, cyclops lesion and extension loss were among the most feared complications. Cyclops and loss of extension are due to the fallback of the remnant into the notch. Moreover, the mechanoreceptors present in the remnant are not active when the remnant is lax. These mechanoreceptors are active when the remnant is in tension. Thus, rather than merely preserving the remnant, it is essential to tension it for more physiological functions. Although there are various techniques of remnant tensioning described in the literature, these techniques require tampering of the fixation devices or an extra fixation device adding to the cost of surgery. We describe our modification of the remnant-tensioning method during anatomic ACL reconstruction. In this technique, the sutures holding the remnant are pulled out through the anatomic femoral tunnel and fixed with an interference screw along with the hamstring graft. This technique is cost-effective, reproducible, and does not require tampering with the fixation devices. Moreover, the direction of remnant pull will be the same as that of the reconstructed graft making both the graft and remnant anatomical in orientation. Suture management and visibility of the intraarticular structures during this procedure are a few downsides of this technique. The only prerequisite of this technique is a good quality remnant to hold the sutures.

Arthroscopy-Assisted All-Suture Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Joint Stabilization in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries.

The existing literature agrees on surgical management for Rockwood grade IV and V injuries, but there is no consensus which type of surgery is the most appropriate one. More than 150 surgeries have been described for this condition in the literature. In an injury of less than 3 weeks, most surgeons prefer suture-button devices for coracoclavicular stabilization. Recent biomechanical studies have demonstrated that coracoclavicular stabilization provides good vertical stability but poor horizontal stability of acromioclavicular joint. Hence, they recommend acromioclavicular stabilization along with coracoclavicular stabilization. The use of a suture-button device for coracoclavicular stabilization requires special implants and instruments along with high surgical skills to drill precisely placed holes in the clavicle and the coracoid in order to avoid fractures from the drill hole. Due to relatively smaller clavicle and coracoid in Asian population, making holes in the clavicle and the coracoid has increased risk of fracture. We describe a technique in which no drill holes are made in the clavicle or the coracoid. In our technique, suture tape is used, which is looped around the coracoid and the clavicle, and the limbs are tied over the clavicle to maintain the coracoclavicular distance. The remaining limbs of suture tape is further looped through the tunnels made in acromion and tied over the acromion to augment the acromioclavicular ligament. The potential advantages of this technique are no costly implant and instruments are required, avoidance of complications associated with drill holes in coracoid and clavicle, both coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints are stabilized, direct repair of the acromioclavicular ligament can be performed, and no need of second surgery for implant removal.

Implant-Free, Transtibial, Bone Bridge Fixation for Knee Surgery Including Tibial Spine and Meniscal Root Fixation.

Fixation over bone bridge is commonly performed during transosseous pullout knee surgeries. This technique requires the drilling of 2 bony tunnels separately. Herein, we describe our technique in which bone bridge fixation is performed with a single bony tunnel. Our technique is described in 4 simple steps. Step 1: A short accessory tunnel is created from a point at least 1 cm away from the aperture of primary bone tunnel and opening into the lumen of the primary tunnel. Step 2: A shuttle suture (PROLENE) loop is passed from the accessory tunnel to the primary tunnel, and the loop is retrieved out of the primary tunnel using an 18-G epidural needle and arthroscopy probe. Step 3: Complimentary limbs of the pullout suture is then shuttled through the accessory tunnel using shuttle suture loop. Step 4: The knots are tied over the intervening bone bridge. Since the sutures are tied over the bone bridge, it has to be strong enough to provide support. This method of fixation is contraindicated when there is severe osteoporosis or if the tunnels are located in metaphysis. A supplemental video demonstration of the technique is included with this article.

Outside-In Repair of Longitudinal Tear of Medial Meniscus: Suture Shuttle Technique.

Meniscal tears are commonly encountered conditions of the knee. In the past, torn menisci were treated by excision of the loose flap. A better understanding of the meniscus anatomy and its biomechanical characteristics has led to the concept of meniscus preservation in eligible cases. Several suture-based repair techniques have been described in literature, including the outside-in technique. Although the outside-in technique of meniscus repair is commonly indicated for the anterior two-thirds of the meniscus, it can be used to repair the posterior part of the meniscus as well. Several modifications of this technique have been described in the literature. We hereby describe our modification of the outside-in technique of meniscus repair with the help of an epidural needle and high-strength sutures that is readily available in operating rooms. The advantages of our technique are that no large incision is required around knee joint, it's inexpensive, it can be performed with basic instruments, and even the tear of meniscus extending up to the posterior horn can be repaired. A supplemental video demonstration of the technique is included with this article.