Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer Lett ; 579: 216480, 2023 11 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931834

ABSTRACT

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with a median survival of 15 months and has limited treatment options. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has shown minimal efficacy in combating GBM, and large clinical trials have failed. New immunotherapy approaches and a deeper understanding of immune surveillance of GBM are needed to advance treatment options for this devastating disease. In this study, we used two preclinical models of GBM: orthotopically delivering either GBM stem cells or employing CRISPR-mediated tumorigenesis by adeno-associated virus, to establish immunologically proficient and non-inflamed tumors, respectively. After tumor development, the innate immune system was activated through long-term STING activation by a pharmacological agonist, which reduced tumor progression and prolonged survival. Recruitment and activation of cytotoxic T-cells were detected in the tumors, and T-cell specificity towards the cancer cells was observed. Interestingly, prolonged STING activation altered the tumor vasculature, inducing hypoxia and activation of VEGFR, as measured by a kinome array and VEGF expression. Combination treatment with anti-PD1 did not provide a synergistic effect, indicating that STING activation alone is sufficient to activate immune surveillance and hinder tumor development through vascular disruption. These results guide future studies to refine innate immune activation as a treatment approach for GBM, in combination with anti-VEGF to impede tumor progression and induce an immunological response against the tumor.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Humans , Brain Neoplasms/immunology , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Glioblastoma/immunology , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Immunotherapy/methods , Tumor Microenvironment , Immunity, Innate
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(18)2022 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36139541

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the Western world and the number is rising. Prostate cancer is notoriously heterogeneous, which makes it hard to generate and study in pre-clinical models. The family of Forkhead box (FOX) transcription factors are often altered in prostate cancer with especially high mutation burden in FOXA1 and FOXP1. FOXA1 harbors loss or gain of function mutations in 8% of prostate cancer, which increases to 14% in metastatic samples. FOXP1 predominately occurs with loss of function mutations in 7% of primary tumors, and similar incidents are found in metastatic samples. Here, we applied in vivo CRISPR editing, to study the loss of functions of these two FOX transcription factors, in murine prostate in combination with loss of Pten. Deficiency of Foxp1 increased proliferation in combination with loss of Pten. In contrast, proliferation was unchanged when androgen was deprived. The expression of Tmprss2 was increased when Foxp1 was mutated in vivo, showing that Foxp1 is a repressor for this androgen-regulated target. Furthermore, analysis of FOXP1 and TMPRSS2 expression in a human prostate cancer data set revealed a negative correlation. Mutation of Foxa1 in the murine prostate induces cell plasticity to luminal cells. Here, epithelial cells with loss of Foxa1 were transdifferentiated to cells with expression of the basal markers Ck5 and p63. Interestingly, these cells were located in the lumen and did not co-express Ck8. Overall, this study reveals that loss of Foxp1 increases cell proliferation, whereas loss of Foxa1 induces epithelial plasticity in prostate cancer.

3.
Curr Opin Pharmacol ; 61: 91-97, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34656940

ABSTRACT

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent form of primary malignant brain tumor in adults and remains almost invariably lethal owing to its aggressive and invasive nature. There have only been marginal improvements in its bleak survival rate of 12-15 months over the last four decades. The lack of preclinical models that efficiently recapitulate tumor biology and the tumor microenvironment is also in part responsible for the slow phase of translational GBM research. Emerging three-dimensional (3D) organoids and cell culture systems offer new and innovative possibilities for GBM modelling. These 3D models find their application to engineer the disease, screen drugs, establishing live biobank, and explore personalized therapy. Furthermore, these models can also be genetically modified by using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 technology, which would allow one to study the specific role of key genes associated with gliomagenesis. Establishment of a coculture system with GBM cells to understand its invasive behavior is yet another major application of this model. Despite these merits, the organoid models also have certain limitations, including the absence of immune responses and vascular systems. In recent years, major progress has been made in the development and refinement of 3D models of GBM. In this review, we intend to highlight these recent advances and the potential future implications of this rapidly evolving field, which should facilitate a better understanding of GBM biology.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/genetics , Humans , Organoids , Tumor Microenvironment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...