Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 21(7): 510-516, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332380

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aims were to report the incidence and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation-infective endocarditis (TAVI-IE) from a high-volume TAVI centre in the United Kingdom, including how incidence varies relative to time from the procedure, and to assess the performance of modified Duke criteria in the diagnosis of TAVI-IE. METHODS: The retrospective, cohort study included all patients who underwent TAVI at Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust during a 10-year period. Outcome measures were the incidence of TAVI-IE, the accuracy of the modified Duke criteria and the mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 1337 patients were followed up for a median of 2.3 years. Thirteen patients (0.97%) were diagnosed with TAVI-IE, mean age of 81.3 years (SD 5.1 years). Four patients (30.8%) fulfilled modified Duke criteria for definite infective endocarditis. The remaining nine patients (69.2%) fulfilled the modified Duke criteria for possible infective endocarditis. In the majority (7/13; 53.8%) the causative organism was streptococcal. Cumulative incidence of TAVI-IE has risen in line with the number of patients living with TAVI prostheses, and cumulative number of TAVI-years. However, in relation to the number of 100 TAVI-years, the infection rate has remained low and static over the last 6 years. The in-hospital mortality rate was 38.5%, all attributable to TAVI-IE. CONCLUSION: The incidence of TAVI-IE was 0.97%, with an associated all-cause mortality of 53.8%. The incidence relative to the number of TAVI-years has remained low and static in recent years. The modified Duke criteria have relatively low sensitivity in the diagnosis of TAVI-IE, meaning that a high index of suspicion is required.


Subject(s)
Endocarditis/epidemiology , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Decision Support Techniques , Endocarditis/diagnosis , Endocarditis/mortality , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome
2.
Heart ; 101 Suppl 3: 1-13, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26041756

ABSTRACT

Over the last 35 years, there has been dramatic progress in the technology and applicability of percutaneous techniques to treat obstructive coronary heart disease. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a considerable evidence base and it is firmly established as the most common procedure used in the invasive treatment of patients with coronary heart disease in the UK. This set of guidelines aims to address specifically issues relating to PCI and not the growing subspecialty of structural heart disease intervention. It is not intended to provide a review of the entire evidence base for coronary intervention. The evidence base relating to PCI is extensively reviewed in international guidelines and the British Cardiovascular Intervention society endorses these guidelines and their updates. The guidelines presented here focus on issues pertinent to practice within the UK and set out a recommended template to ensure optimal delivery of patient care.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/standards , Certification/standards , Clinical Competence/standards , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Humans , Patient Care Team/standards , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/education , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
3.
Heart ; 100(24): 1939-45, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25053724

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to identify predictors of paraprosthetic aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and examine its influence on short/medium-term mortality using the UK TAVI Registry. TAVI is an effective treatment for high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), but paraprosthetic AR has been associated with increased in-hospital and mid-term mortality. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2011, 2584 TAVI procedures were performed in the UK. Patients undergoing 'valve-in-valve' procedures, patients with aortic regurgitation as the primary pathology and with no recorded severity of AR were excluded from this analysis (n=144). In total, therefore, 2440 patients were included. Balloon-expandable and self-expanding devices were implanted in 52.7 and 47.2%, respectively, using either transfemoral (67.7%) or non-transfemoral, surgical access (32.3%). RESULTS: Postprocedural AR was observed in 68%, mild AR in 57% and moderate-severe in 10%. A large aortic annulus, high preprocedural transaortic gradient, and use of self-expanding valve were independent predictors of moderate-severe AR. Moderate-severe (but not mild) AR was associated with increased mortality, and this relationship appeared significant for the balloon-expandable but not the self-expanding device. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a large aortic annulus, high preprocedural transaortic gradient, and use of the self-expanding valve predict moderate-severe AR after TAVI. Such a degree of AR is associated with a significantly worse outcome with the balloon-expandable, but not with the self-expanding valve. Further studies are needed to verify this and explore potential mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aortic Valve/pathology , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/pathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Balloon Valvuloplasty/adverse effects , Balloon Valvuloplasty/mortality , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Prospective Studies , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality
4.
EuroIntervention ; 7(5): 621-8, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21930467

ABSTRACT

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has taken the world of cardiovascular therapies by storm. The possibility of implanting aortic valves without recourse to sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass has been embraced by cardiologists, surgeons and patients alike as a revolution in management. First performed in 2002 by Alain Cribier, the technique has exploded into common use during the last three years, such that over 20,000 implants have now been undertaken worldwide. This article discusses complications of TAVI, their avoidance and management.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans , Patient Selection , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL