Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Sportsmed ; 44(2): 141-7, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26882105

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of femoral and tibial tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using independent anteromedial portal (AMP) drilling over a three-year observation period. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 161 consecutive primary ACL reconstructions from a single surgeon over his first 36-months in practice. Femoral and tibial tunnel angulation measurements were made on anteroposterior radiographs by a single observer utilizing the assessment method described by Aglietti et al. The accuracy and precision of tunnel placement across the three-year period were assessed with comparisons made. RESULTS: Significantly improved accuracy was demonstrated toward the cadaveric ideal femoral tunnel angle of 33.5° over time. Improved precision of tunnel placement was also demonstrated evidenced by declining standard deviations across each year. Statistically significant improvement in femoral tunnel placement was seen between the first and second cohorts of 32 cases. No significant change was seen with respect to tibial tunnel angle across the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: A learning curve in developing accuracy and precision in ACL femoral tunnel placement using the AMP technique exists; our study indicates this to be somewhere between 32 and 64 cases. Tibial tunnel placement does not share the same learning curve using this surgical technique.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/education , Clinical Competence , Learning Curve , Adult , Aged , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Female , Femur/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tibia/surgery , Young Adult
2.
Instr Course Lect ; 64: 511-20, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25745934

ABSTRACT

The management of meniscal pathology continues to evolve as researchers gain a better understanding of the role of the meniscus in normal knee kinematics. Evidence now supports retention or transplantation of meniscal tissue to maintain homeostatic knee mechanisms because the removal of meniscal tissue changes the contact stresses and leads to structural and biomechanical changes in the articular cartilage and the subchondral plate that predisposes the knee to the development of degenerative arthritis. Advances in repair techniques, biologic adjuvants, and progressive tissue-engineering strategies are rapidly adding to the surgeon's armamentarium when dealing with meniscal injury and insufficiency. Early clinical data support many of these advanced techniques. It is helpful to explore meniscal function, pathology, and current treatment modalities, with a focus on meniscal repair and transplantation as well as adjuvants to biologic healing and future directions in this field.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/surgery , Knee Injuries/surgery , Menisci, Tibial , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Humans , Menisci, Tibial/surgery , Menisci, Tibial/transplantation , Tibial Meniscus Injuries , Transplantation, Homologous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...