Prospective randomised clinical trial of providing patients with audiotape recordings of their oesophagogastric cancer consultations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate audiotape-recorded consultations at which a new diagnosis of oesophageal or gastric cancer was given to patients with reference to information retention, psychological outcome and socio-economic deprivation. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were randomised to receive audiotaped consultations or not. Thirty-one patients received tapes (12 oesophageal and 19 gastric cancers) and were compared with 27 control patients (12 oesophageal and 15 gastric cancers). All patients were re-interviewed and completed a hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) questionnaire. Socio-economic deprivation scores were calculated using National Indices of Multiple Deprivation. RESULTS: Patients randomised to receive tapes were more likely to retain information (31 patients) than control patients (18 patients, p=0.001). Median (range) HAD scores were similar in both groups of patients [HAD A tape 6 (0-21) vs. no tape 5 (2-14), HAD D tape 3 (0-23) vs. 4 (0-10), respectively]. Deprivation correlated significantly with higher HAD A scores in control patients (p=0.039) but was not associated with information retention (p=0.667). CONCLUSION: Taped consultations were associated with significantly better information retention without adverse psychological outcomes. Providing an audiotape may reduce the effect of socio-economic deprivation on patient anxiety. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Audiotaping, or its equivalent, would be a valuable tool in the multidisciplinary approach to cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Multidisciplinary team management is associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer.

We aim to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing R0 esophagectomy by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) with outcomes after surgery alone performed by surgeons working independently in a UK cancer unit. An historical control group of 77 consecutive patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer and undergoing surgery with curative intent by six general surgeons between 1991 and 1997 (54 R0 esophagectomies) were compared with a group of 67 consecutive patients managed by the MDT between 1998 and 2003 (53 R0 esophagectomies, 26 patients received multimodal therapy). The proportion of patients undergoing open and closed laparotomy and thoracotomy decreased from 21% and 5%, respectively, in control patients, to 13% and 0% in MDT patients (chi2 = 11.90, DF = 1, P = 0.001; chi2 = 5.45, DF = 1, P = 0.02 respectively). MDT patients had lower operative mortality (5.7%vs. 26%; chi2 = 8.22, DF = 1, P = 0.004) than control patients, and were more likely to survive 5 years (52%vs. 10%, chi2 = 15.05, P = 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, MDT management (HR = 0.337, 95% CI = 0.201-0.564, P < 0.001), lymph node metastases (HR = 1.728, 95% CI = 1.070-2.792, P = 0.025), and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (HR = 2.207, 95% CI = 1.412-3.450, P = 0.001) were independently associated with duration of survival. Multidisciplinary team management and surgical subspecialization improved outcomes after surgery significantly for patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer.

Prognostic significance of alarm symptoms in patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and spectrum of alarm symptoms in patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer, and to examine the relationship between symptoms and outcome. METHODS: Three hundred consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were studied prospectively. The outcomes of 40 patients (13.3 per cent) without alarm symptoms (21 men; median age 69 years) were compared with those of the 260 patients (86.7 per cent) with alarm symptoms (175 men; median age 72 years). RESULTS: It was possible to perform an R0 gastrectomy more often in patients without alarm symptoms (21 patients; 52 per cent) than in those with alarm symptoms (71 patients; 27.3 per cent) (chi(2) = 10.35, 1 d.f., P = 0.001). The cumulative survival rate at 5 years was 38 per cent for patients without alarm symptoms versus 15.0 per cent for those with alarm symptoms (chi(2) = 10.18, 1 d.f., P = 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, distant metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) 2.73 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 2.04 to 3.66); P < 0.001), overall stage of cancer (HR 1.83 (95 per cent c.i. 1.53 to 2.19); P < 0.001) and persistent vomiting at diagnosis (HR 1.66 (95 per cent c.i. 1.26 to 2.18); P < 0.001) were independently associated with length of survival. CONCLUSION: Alarm symptoms are absent in a significant minority of patients with gastric cancer at diagnosis; these patients stand a better chance of curative surgery and long-term survival than those with alarm symptoms.

Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma.

To compare the outcomes after D1 gastrectomy with those after modified D2 gastrectomy (preserving pancreas and spleen) performed by specialist surgeons for gastric cancer in a large UK NHS Trust. In all, 118 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were referred by postcode, to undergo either a D1 gastrectomy (North Gwent (RJ), n=36, median age 76 years, 21 m) or a modified D2 gastrectomy (South Gwent (WL), n=82, 70 years, 57 m). Operative mortality in the two groups of patients was similar (D1 8.3% vs D2 7.3%, chi2 0.286, DF 1, P=0.593). Overall cumulative survival at 5 years was 32% after D1 gastrectomy compared to 59% after D2 gastrectomy (chi2 4.25, DF 1, P=0.0392). In patients with stage III cancers, survival was 8% after D1, compared with 33% after D2 gastrectomy (chi2 6.43, DF 1, P=0.0112). In a multivariate analysis, T stage (hazard ratio 2.339, 95% CI 1.683-2.995, P=0.01), N stage (hazard ratio 4.026, 95% CI 3.536-4.516, P=0.0001) and the extent of lymphadenectomy (hazard ratio 0.258, 95% CI -0.426-0.942, P=0.0001) were independently associated with durations of survival. In conclusion, modified D2 gastrectomy can improve survival four-fold for patients with stage III gastric cancer, without significantly increasing morbidity and mortality when compared with a D1 gastrectomy.

Comparison of special interest computed tomography, endosonography and histopathological stage of oesophageal cancer.

AIMS: To assess the strength of agreement between the perceived pre-operative stage of oesophageal tumours as determined by spiral computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), both alone and in combination, with the histopathological stage. METHODS: Sixty patients with oesophageal cancer underwent both pre-operative CT and EUS performed by two consultant radiologists with a special interest in upper gastrointestinal radiology. The strength of the agreement between the radiological stage and the histopathological stage was determined by means of the weighted Kappa statistic (Kw). RESULTS: Sensitivity for T and N stages was 58% and 79% for CT, and 72% and 91% for EUS. Specificity for T and N stages was 80% and 84% for CT, and 85% and 68% for EUS. Kw for T and N stages was 0.455 (p=0.0001) and 0.603 (p=0.0001) for CT compared with 0.604 (p=0.0001) and 0.610 (p=0.0001) for EUS. In patients when CT and EUS agreed regarding the T and N stages, the strength of agreement between the radiological and the histopathological stage was greater (Kw T 0.613 (p=0.0001), Kw N 0.781 (p=0.0001)). CONCLUSION: CT and EUS are complimentary techniques for the staging of oesophageal tumours, and these results reinforce the importance of specialist radiology in stage directed management.

Illumination of x-rays: the usual lights exposed.

AIMS: Faced with pressure of work and limited resource, doctors frequently use the nearest available light to examine x-ray films. The aim of this study was to examine the relative intensities of hospital light sources, and to compare these with the light intensity guidelines (1500 to 3000 candelas) of the British Institute of Radiology. METHODS: The relative intensities of seven hospital light sources were examined using a standard light meter at a constant 30 cm from the source. A control group of 10 individual consultant's x-ray viewing boxes were compared with six other ward based light sources. RESULTS: Only two light sources approached the British Institute of Radiology light intensity x-ray viewing criteria: the x-ray viewing boxes of consultant radiologists with a median light intensity of 3503 candelas (chi(2)=13.3, df 1; p=0.0001), and daylight from north facing windows with a median of 1464 candelas when overcast (chi(2)=8.571, df 1; p=0.003) and 4669 candelas in sunshine (chi(2)= 6.364, df 1; p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Few hospital light sources met the British Institute of Radiology guidelines. The long held high regard of artists for northern light appears justified even in the environment of a British district general hospital.