Anatomical Variation of Abdominal Wall Musculature: An Objective Assessment Using Cross-Sectional Imaging.

Purpose: To determine normal anatomical variation of abdominal wall musculature. Methods: A retrospective analysis of CT scans was performed on adults (>18 years) with normal abdominal wall muscles. Two radiologists analysed the images independently. Distances from three fixed points in the midline were measured. The fixed points were; P1, mid-way between xiphoid and umbilicus, P2, at the umbilicus, and P3, mid-way between umbilicus and pubic symphysis. From these three fixed points the following measurements were recorded; midline to lateral innermost border of the abdominal wall musculature, midline to lateral edge of rectus abdominis muscle, and midline to medial edges of all three lateral abdominal wall muscles. To obtain aponeurotic width, rectus abdominis width was subtracted from the distance to medial edge of lateral abdominal wall muscle. Results: Fifty normal CT scan were evaluated from between March 2023 to August 2023. Mean width of external oblique aponeurosis at P1 was 16.2 mm (IQR 9.2 mm to 20.7 mm), at P2 was 23.5 mm (IQR 14 mm to 33 mm), and at P3 no external oblique muscle was visible. Mean width of the internal oblique aponeurosis at P1 was 32.1 mm (IQR 17.5 mm to 45 mm), at P2 was 10.13 (IQR 1 mm to 17.5 mm), and at P3 was 9.2 mm (IQR 3.0 mm to 13.7 mm). Mean width of the transversus abdominis aponeurosis at P1 was -25.1 mm (IQR 37.8 mm to -15.0 mm), at P2 was 29.4 mm (IQR 20 mm to 39.8 mm), and at P3 was 20.3 mm (IQR 12 mm to 29 mm). Conclusion: In this study we describe normal anatomical variation of the abdominal wall muscles. Assessing this variability on the pre-operative CT scans of ventral hernia patients allows for detailed operative planning and decision making.

A Ventral Hernia Management Pathway; A "Getting It Right First Time" approach to Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is an emerging specialty, involving complex multi-stage operations in patients with high medical and surgical risk. At our hospital, we have developed a growing interest in AWR, with a commitment to improving outcomes through a regular complex hernia MDT. An MDT approach to these patients is increasingly recognized as the path forward in management to optimize patients and improve outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a literature review and combined this with our experiential knowledge of managing these cases to create a pathway for the management of our abdominal wall patients. This was done under the auspices of GIRFT (Getting It Right First Time) as a quality improvement project at our hospital. RESULTS: We describe, in detail, our current AWR pathway, including the checklists and information documents we use with a stepwise evidence and experience-based approach to identifying the multiple factors associated with good outcomes. We explore the current literature and discuss our best practice pathway. CONCLUSION: In this emerging specialty, there is limited guidance on the management of these patients. Our pathway, the "Complex Hernia Bundle," currently provides guidance for our abdominal wall team and may well be one that could be adopted/adapted by other centers where challenging hernia cases are undertaken.

Accuracy of Four Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Posterior Pelvic Floor Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the diagnostic test accuracy of evacuation proctography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transperineal ultrasonography, and endovaginal ultrasonography for detecting posterior pelvic floor disorders (rectocele, enterocele, intussusception, and anismus) in women with obstructed defecation syndrome and secondarily to identify the most patient-friendly imaging technique. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 131 women with symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome underwent evacuation proctogram, MRI, and transperineal and endovaginal ultrasonography. Images were analyzed by two blinded observers. In the absence of a reference standard, latent class analysis was used to assess diagnostic test accuracy of multiple tests with area under the curve (AUC) as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were interobserver agreement calculated as Cohen's κ and patient acceptability using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: No significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were found among the imaging techniques for all the target conditions. Estimates of diagnostic test accuracy were highest for rectocele using MRI (AUC 0.79) or transperineal ultrasonography (AUC 0.85), for enterocele using transperineal (AUC 0.73) or endovaginal ultrasonography (AUC 0.87), for intussusception using evacuation proctography (AUC 0.76) or endovaginal ultrasonography (AUC 0.77), and for anismus using endovaginal (AUC 0.95) or transperineal ultrasonography (AUC 0.78). Interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of rectocele (κ 0.53-0.72), enterocele (κ 0.54-0.94) and anismus (κ 0.43-0.81) was moderate to excellent, but poor to fair for intussusception (κ -0.03 to 0.37) with all techniques. Patient acceptability was better for transperineal and endovaginal ultrasonography as compared with MRI and evacuation proctography (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Evacuation proctography, MRI, and transperineal and endovaginal ultrasonography were shown to have similar diagnostic test accuracy. Evacuation proctography is not the best available imaging technique. There is no one optimal test for the diagnosis of all posterior pelvic floor disorders. Because transperineal and endovaginal ultrasonography have good test accuracy and patient acceptability, we suggest these could be used for initial assessment of obstructed defecation syndrome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02239302.

Local staging and assessment of colon cancer with 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of 1.5-T MRI in the pre-operative local T and N staging of colon cancer and identification of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI). METHODS:: Between 2010 and 2012, 60 patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon were prospectively recruited at 2 centres. 55 patients were included for final analysis. Patients received pre-operative 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution T2 weighted, gadolinium-enhanced T1 weighted and diffusion-weighted images. These were blindly assessed by two expert radiologists. Accuracy of the T-stage, N-stage and EMVI assessment was evaluated using post-operative histology as the gold standard. RESULTS:: Results are reported for two readers. Identification of T3 disease demonstrated an accuracy of 71% and 51%, sensitivity of 74% and 42% and specificity of 74% and 83%. Identification of N1 disease demonstrated an accuracy of 57% for both readers, sensitivity of 26% and 35% and specificity of 81% and 74%. Identification of EMVI demonstrated an accuracy of 74% and 69%, sensitivity 63% and 26% and specificity 80% and 91%. CONCLUSION:: 1.5-T MRI achieved a moderate accuracy in the local evaluation of colon cancer, but cannot be recommended to replace CT on the basis of this study. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: This study confirms that MRI is a viable alternative to CT for the local assessment of colon cancer, but this study does not reproduce the very high accuracy reported in the only other study to assess the accuracy of MRI in colon cancer staging.

Perfusion CT vascular parameters do not correlate with immunohistochemically derived microvessel density count in colorectal tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine whether perfusion computed tomography (CT)-derived vascular parameters-namely, blood flow, mean transit time (MTT), volume transfer constant (K(trans)), permeability-surface area product (PS), extracellular extravascular space volume, and vascular volume-correlate with the immunohistologic markers of angiogenesis in colorectal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the Regional Ethics and Research and Development Committees. The perfusion CT protocol was incorporated in the staging CT after informed consent in 29 patients (14 men, 15 women; mean age, 70 years; age range, 55-94 years). The perfusion parameters were calculated over two regions of interest (ROIs), at the invasive and luminal site defined by two radiologists independently. Accurate representative data were captured manually by correcting for motion artifacts and were analyzed by using Matlab software. The vascular heterogeneity between ROIs was assessed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Perfusion CT parameters were correlated with the microvessel density (MVD) count at both corresponding sites obtained by means of immunohistochemical staining of the selected histologic slide with factor VIII and CD105 antigens by using Spearmen rank coefficient. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference found between perfusion CT vascular parameters at the two ROIs by either of the radiologists. The Pearson coefficient for blood flow, MTT, K(trans), and PS at the two ROIs demonstrated good to moderate interobserver variability (for the two ROIs, 0.46 and 0.44; 0.67 and 0.64; 0.41 and 0.72; and 0.86 and 0.56, respectively). None of these parameters correlated with MVD count at the invasive or the luminal site for either of the two antigens. CONCLUSION: Perfusion CT measurements may measure vascularity of colorectal tumors, however, correlation with MVD, which is a morphologic measure, appears inappropriate. © RSNA, 2013.