Nilotinib vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 3-year follow-up.

Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials Newly Diagnosed Patients compares nilotinib and imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). With a minimum follow-up of 3 years, major molecular response, molecular response of BCR-ABL≤ 0.01% expressed on the international scale (BCR-ABL(IS); MR(4)) and BCR-ABL(IS)≤ 0.0032% (MR(4.5)) rates were significantly higher with nilotinib compared with imatinib, and differences in the depth of molecular response between nilotinib and imatinib have increased over time. No new progressions occurred on treatment since the 2-year analysis. Nilotinib was associated with a significantly lower probability of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis vs imatinib (two (0.7%) progressions on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, three (1.1%) on nilotinib 400 mg twice daily and 12 (4.2%) on imatinib). When considering progressions occurring after study treatment discontinuation, the advantage of nilotinib over imatinib in preventing progression remained significant (nine (3.2%) progressions on nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, six (2.1%) on nilotinib 400 mg twice daily and 19 (6.7%) on imatinib). Both nilotinib and imatinib were well tolerated, with minimal changes in safety over time. Nilotinib continues to demonstrate superior efficacy in all key response and outcome parameters compared with imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP.

Nilotinib is effective in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blastic phase.

Nilotinib is a selective inhibitor of BCR-ABL approved for use in newly diagnosed and imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. In this study, 400 mg of nilotinib was administered twice daily to the patients with myeloid (MBP, n=105) or lymphoid blastic phase (LBP, n=31) CML. After a minimum follow-up of 24 months, major hematologic responses were observed in 60% (MBP) and 59% (LBP) of patients. Major cytogenetic responses (MCyR) were attained in 38% (MBP) and 52% (LBP) of patients; and complete cytogenetic responses in 30% and 32%, respectively. Median duration of MCyR was 10.8 (MBP) and 3.2 months (LBP). Median overall survival was 10.1 (MBP) and 7.9 (LBP) months with 12- and 24-month survival of 42% (MBP 44%, LBP 35%) and 27% (MBP 32%, LBP 10%), respectively. Twelve MBP patients and two LBP patients received subsequent stem cell transplantation. Myelosuppression was frequent, with grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia in 68%, 63% and 47% of patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 hypophosphatemia, hyperbilirubinemia and lipase elevation were observed in 15%, 11% and 11% of patients, respectively. Nilotinib has significant efficacy in patients with BP CML, but given the limited long-term survival of these patients, novel agents are needed.