Real-World Outcomes of Belantamab Mafodotin for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Preliminary Results of a Spanish Expanded Access Program (EAP).

INTRODUCTION: Belantamab mafodotin (BM) is a new anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate, recently approved for triple-class relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We assessed real-world outcomes with BM in patients under the Spanish Expanded Access Program (EAP). METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicenter study including RRMM patients who received ≥ 1 dose of BM (Nov 2019 to Jun 2021). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included with a median of 70 years of age (range, 46-79 years). Median time from diagnosis was 71 months (range, 10-858 months). Median prior lines was 5 (range, 3-8 lines); 90% of patients were triple-/quad-/penta-refractory; 48% showed high-risk cytogenetics. Median BM doses was 3 (range 1-16 doses), with a median follow-up of 11 months (6-15 months). ORR was 42.2% (≥ VGPR, 18.2%). Median PFS was 3 months (95% CI 0.92-5.08) in the overall population, and 11 months (HR 0.26; 95% CI 0.10-0.68) for patients who achieved ≥ PR. PFS was not significantly different according to age, cytogenetic risk, and prior therapy lines. OS was 424 days (95% CI 107-740). Non-hematological TEAEs (57.6% of patients; 30.3% ≥ G3) included keratopathy (51.5%; 21.2% ≥ G3) and patient-reported vision-related symptoms (45.5%). Keratopathy was resolved in 70.6% of patients. G3 hematological TEAEs was 18.2%, thrombocytopenia (21.2%). Dose reductions due to TEAEs: 30.3%; delays: 36.4%. Treatment discontinuation causes: progression (54.5%), toxicity (non-ocular; 6%/ocular; 6% /ocular + non-ocular toxicity; 3%), death (6%), and patient's decision (3%). CONCLUSIONS: BM showed relevant anti-myeloma activity in RRMM with a manageable safety profile. These results corroborate those observed in the BM pivotal trial.

Zoledronic acid as compared with observation in multiple myeloma patients at biochemical relapse: results of the randomized AZABACHE Spanish trial.

This study analyzed the anti-myeloma effect of zoledronic acid monotherapy by investigating patients at the time of asymptomatic biochemical relapse. One hundred patients were randomized to receive either zoledronic acid (4 mg iv/4 weeks, 12 doses) (n=51) or not (n=49). Experimental and control groups were well balanced for disease and prognostic features. Zoledronic acid did not show an antitumor effect according to changes in M-component. However, there were fewer symptomatic progressions in the experimental group than in the control group (34 versus 41, respectively; P=0.05) resulting in a median time to symptoms of 16 versus 10 months (P=0.161). The median time to next therapy was also slightly longer for the treated group than the untreated, control group (13.4 versus 10.1 months), although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.360). The pattern of relapses was different for treated versus control patients: progressive bone disease (8 versus 20), anemia (24 versus 18), renal dysfunction (1 versus 2), and plasmacytomas (1 versus 1, respectively). This concurred with fewer skeletal-related events in the treated group than in the control group (2 versus 14), with a projected 4-year event proportion of 6% versus 40% (P<0.001). In summary, zoledronic acid monotherapy does not show an antitumor effect on biochemical relapses in multiple myeloma, but does reduce the risk of progression with symptomatic bone disease and skeletal complications. This trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database with code NCT01087008.

Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma.

We assessed the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in multiple myeloma (MM) patients using a sequencing-based platform in bone marrow samples from 133 MM patients in at least very good partial response (VGPR) after front-line therapy. Deep sequencing was carried out in patients in whom a high-frequency myeloma clone was identified and MRD was assessed using the IGH-VDJH, IGH-DJH, and IGK assays. The results were contrasted with those of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR). The applicability of deep sequencing was 91%. Concordance between sequencing and MFC and ASO-PCR was 83% and 85%, respectively. Patients who were MRD(-) by sequencing had a significantly longer time to tumor progression (TTP) (median 80 vs 31 months; P < .0001) and overall survival (median not reached vs 81 months; P = .02), compared with patients who were MRD(+). When stratifying patients by different levels of MRD, the respective TTP medians were: MRD ≥10(-3) 27 months, MRD 10(-3) to 10(-5) 48 months, and MRD <10(-5) 80 months (P = .003 to .0001). Ninety-two percent of VGPR patients were MRD(+). In complete response patients, the TTP remained significantly longer for MRD(-) compared with MRD(+) patients (131 vs 35 months; P = .0009).

Marcadores pronósticos en pacientes con gammapatía monoclonal de significado incierto / Prognostic markers in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Objetivo: El estudio de biomarcadores pronósticos en gammapatías monoclonales de significado incierto (MGUS) exige usar cohortes muy grandes y seguimientos prolongados, dada la baja tasa de conversión a mieloma múltiple (MM). Nuestro objetivo fue poner a punto un modelo que permita usar con alta fiabilidad cohortes menores y seguimientos más reducidos. Pacientes y métodos Estudiamos 64 pacientes con MGUS, seguidos prospectivamente durante 6 ± 0,24 años. Los clasificamos en fenotipo evolving y non-evolving dependiendo del aumento o no de los niveles de inmunoglobulina monoclonal a lo largo del tiempo. Evaluamos el riesgo de conversión a MM en función de estos fenotipos y si los factores que predicen la conversión a MM se asocian con la aparición de un fenotipo evolving. Resultados Once pacientes mostraron fenotipo evolving y 53 fenotipo non-evolving. Todos los pacientes que convirtieron a MM mostraron previamente un fenotipo evolving (p = 0,003). Al diagnóstico el fenotipo evolving se asoció con proteínas monoclonales de isotipo IgA (27 vs. 9%), niveles de IgG monoclonal superiores a 1.500 mg/dl (p = 0,007, OR 9,8) y cocientes kappa/lambda alterados (p = 0,001, OR 11,7).Conclusiones Los factores de riesgo de desarrollar un fenotipo evolving en pacientes con MGUS coinciden con los que ya se han descrito para el desarrollo de MM. Estos datos muestran la validez del modelo evolving/non-evolving para estudiar marcadores que predigan la evolución de pacientes con MGUS, y confirman el papel de los niveles de inmunoglobulina monoclonal y la ratio de cadenas ligeras en el pronóstico de esta enfermedad (AU)

Objective: The assessment of prognostic biomarkers in monoclonal gammopathies of uncertain significance (MGUS) requires using large cohorts and long follow-ups, due to the low rate of conversion to multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of this article is to develop a model that allows smaller cohorts and shorter follow-ups to be used with high reliability. Patients and methods: A total of 64 MGUS patients were studied and followed-up prospectively for 6 ± 0.24 years. Patients were classified as evolving or non-evolving, depending on whether the monoclonal protein levels increased or not over time. The risk of conversion to MM was tested based on these phenotypes, and whether the factors that predict conversion to MM are also associated with the appearance of an evolving phenotype. Results: Eleven patients showed an evolving phenotype, and 53 a non-evolving one. All patients who converted to MM previously showed evolving phenotype (P = .003). At diagnosis, evolving phenotype associated with monoclonal gammopathies of IgA isotype (27 vs. 9%), monoclonal IgG levels above 1,500mg/dl (P = .007, OR 9.8) and altered kappa/lambda ratios (P = .001,OR 11.7).Conclusions: Risk factors for developing an evolving phenotype in MGUS patients are the same as those already described for the development of MM. These data show the validity of the evolving/non-evolving model to study markers to predict the outcome of MGUS patients, and confirm the role of the levels of monoclonal IgG and the light chains ratio in the prognosis of this disease (AU)