Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 4(1): e000638, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32420457

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Newborn resuscitation relies on accurate heart rate (HR) assessment, which, during auscultation, is prone to error. We investigated if a 6 s visual timer (VT) could improve HR assessment accuracy during newborn simulation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study of newborn healthcare professionals. SETTING: Three-phase developmental approach: phase I: HR auscultation during newborn simulation using a standard clock timer (CT) or the VT; phase II: repeat phase I after using a bespoke training app (NeoRate); phase III: following the Newborn Life Support course, participants assessed random HRs using the CT or VT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HR accuracy (within ±10 beats/min, correct HR category, i.e. <60, 60-100 and >100 beats/min), assessment time and error-free rates were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 1974 HR assessments were performed with participants more accurate using the VT for ±10 beats/min (70% CT vs 86% VT, p<0.001) and correct HR category (78% CT vs 84% VT, p<0.01). The VT improved accuracy across all three phases. Additionally, following app training in phase II, the HR accuracy of both the CT and VT improved. The VT resulted in faster HR assessment times of 11 s (IQR 9-13) compared with the CT at 15 s (IQR 9-23, p<0.001). Error-free scenarios increased from 24% using the CT to 57% using the VT (p<0.001), with a shorter assessment time (CT 116 s (IQR 65-156) vs VT 53 s (IQR 50-64), p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Using a VT to assess simulated newborn HR combined with a training app significantly improves accuracy and reduces assessment time compared with standard methods. Evaluation in the clinical setting is required to determine potential benefits.

2.
Trials ; 20(1): 437, 2019 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31311577

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Amblyopia (lazy eye) affects the vision of approximately 2% of all children. Traditional treatment consists of wearing a patch over their 'good' eye for a number of hours daily, over several months. This treatment is unpopular and compliance is often low. Therefore, results can be poor. I-BiT is a system, based on stereo technology using shutter glasses, designed to treat amblyopia using dichoptic stimulation. This trial uses a redesigned system for home use and includes eye-tracking capability. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomised controlled trial involving three groups of 40 patients each, aged between 3.5 and 12 years, with a diagnosis of (1) anisometropic amblyopia, (2) mixed or strabismic amblyopia prior to strabismic surgery and (3) mixed or strabismic amblyopia who have just undergone strabismus surgery. They will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio between I-BiT and control and will receive treatment, at home over a 6-week period. Their visual acuity will be assessed independently at baseline, mid-treatment (week 3), at the end of treatment (week 6) and, for those receiving the active I-BiT treatment, 4 weeks after completing treatment (week 10). The primary endpoint will be the change in visual acuity from baseline to the end of treatment. Secondary endpoints will be additional visual acuity measures, patient acceptability, compliance and the incidence of adverse events. DISCUSSION: This is a randomised controlled trial using the redesigned I-BiT™ system to determine if this is a feasible treatment strategy for the management of anisometropic, strabismic and mixed amblyopia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Number/Clinical trials.gov, ID: NCT02810847 . Registered on 23 June 2016.


Subject(s)
Amblyopia/therapy , Eyeglasses , Sensory Deprivation , Strabismus/therapy , Video Games , Vision, Binocular , Visual Acuity , Age Factors , Amblyopia/diagnosis , Amblyopia/physiopathology , Child , Child, Preschool , England , Equipment Design , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recovery of Function , Strabismus/diagnosis , Strabismus/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL