Understanding exercise referrals in primary care: a qualitative study of General Practitioners and Physiotherapists.

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is estimated to cost the UK National Health Service over £7.4 billion per year. Healthcare practitioners have a key role in supporting increases in physical activity (PA) levels, including referring to exercise referral schemes. To date, there has been little research into practitioner perspectives on referrals to exercise schemes. OBJECTIVES: To explore the views and experiences of General Practitioners (GPs) and physiotherapists in relation to factors which influence referral and adherence to exercise referral schemes. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative study of primary care-based practitioners in Glasgow, UK. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 practitioners (seven GPs and seven physiotherapists). Interviews were recorded and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Four themes are presented. Firstly, all people, including healthcare practitioners, bring inherent biases which are influenced by their background, experiences and worldviews to a consultation which impact their approach to PA promotion. Secondly, clinical time pressures are a major barrier to effective PA promotion. Thirdly, patient-led, compassionate care which seeks to fully understand a patient is the most vital component of behaviour change, with suggestions that promoting peer support and the use of personal anecdotes to normalise vulnerabilities might be helpful. Lastly, providing ongoing support for change was felt to be beneficial to PA promotion. This is often accessed through exercise referral schemes and improved by better collaboration between exercise providers and referring practitioners. CONCLUSION: Practitioners believed exercise referrals could be improved with more targeted training in behaviour change facilitation, support for multidisciplinary working, and enhanced communication between the programmes and referrers. Additionally, supporting behaviour change requires time for compassionate care and fully understanding patients' motivations and beliefs. Lack of time was felt to be the greatest current barrier to effective PA promotion. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

Storylines of family medicine X: standing up for diversity, equity and inclusion.

Storylines of Family Medicine is a 12-part series of thematically linked mini-essays with accompanying illustrations that explore the many dimensions of family medicine as interpreted by individual family physicians and medical educators in the USA and elsewhere around the world. In 'X: standing up for diversity, equity and inclusion', authors address the following themes: 'The power of diversity-why inclusivity is essential to equity in healthcare', 'Medical education for whom?', 'Growing a diverse and inclusive workforce', 'Therapeutic judo-an inclusive approach to patient care', 'Global family medicine-seeing the world "upside down"', 'The inverse care law', 'Social determinants of health as a lens for care', 'Why family physicians should care about human rights' and 'Toward health equity-the opportunome'. May the essays that follow inspire readers to promote change.

Intersectionality as a theoretical framework for researching health inequities in chronic pain.

Chronic pain is experienced unequally by different population groups; we outline examples from the pain literature of inequities related to gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic and migration status. Health inequities are systematic, avoidable and unfair differences in health outcomes between groups of people, with the fundamental 'causes of causes' recognised as unequal distribution of income, power and wealth. Intersectionality can add further theory to health inequities literature; collective social identities including class/socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, gender, migration status, age, sexuality and disabled status intersect in multiple interconnected systems of power leading to differing experiences of privilege and oppression which can be understood as axes of health inequities. The process of knowledge creation in pain research is shaped by these interconnected systems of power, and may perpetuate inequities in pain care as it is largely based on majority white, middle class, Eurocentric populations. Intersectionality can inform research epistemology (ways of knowing), priorities, methodology and methods. We give examples from the literature where intersectionality has informed a justice oriented approach across different research methods and we offer suggestions for further development. The use of a reductionist frame can force unachievable objectivity on to complex health concepts, and we note increasing realisation in the field of the need to understand the individuals within their social world, and recognise the fluid and contextual nature of this.

True prevalence of long-COVID in a nationwide, population cohort study.

Long-COVID prevalence estimates vary widely and should take account of symptoms that would have occurred anyway. Here we determine the prevalence of symptoms attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection, taking account of background rates and confounding, in a nationwide population cohort study of 198,096 Scottish adults. 98,666 (49.8%) had symptomatic laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and 99,430 (50.2%) were age-, sex-, and socioeconomically-matched and never-infected. While 41,775 (64.5%) reported at least one symptom 6 months following SARS-CoV-2 infection, this was also true of 34,600 (50.8%) of those never-infected. The crude prevalence of one or more symptom attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection was 13.8% (13.2%,14.3%), 12.8% (11.9%,13.6%), and 16.3% (14.4%,18.2%) at 6, 12, and 18 months respectively. Following adjustment for potential confounders, these figures were 6.6% (6.3%, 6.9%), 6.5% (6.0%, 6.9%) and 10.4% (9.1%, 11.6%) respectively. Long-COVID is characterised by a wide range of symptoms that, apart from altered taste and smell, are non-specific. Care should be taken in attributing symptoms to previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Addressing food insecurity: what is the role of healthcare?

Food insecurity - when individuals or households have difficulty accessing sufficient, safe, culturally appropriate and nutritious food due to lack of money or other resources - is a global public health concern. Levels of food insecurity have increased across the UK in recent years, due in part to a decade of austerity, widespread loss of income during the COVID-19 pandemic and the more recent cost-of-living crisis, leading to rising use of food banks. The stress of living with uncertain access to food and going periods without food is damaging to physical and mental health. Food insecurity is linked to both obesity and malnutrition, as often the most readily available foods are processed, high in fats, sugars and salt, but low in essential nutrients for health. While recognising that many of the drivers of food insecurity, and health inequalities more broadly (i.e. the social determinants of health) lie outside the health service, it is increasingly acknowledged that the National Health Service - and primary care in particular - has a key role to play in mitigating health inequalities. This review considers the potential role of healthcare in mitigating food insecurity, with a focus on primary care settings. Recent initiatives in Scotland, such as community links workers and general practitioner practice-attached financial advice workers, have shown promise as part of a more community-oriented approach to primary care, which can mitigate the effects of food insecurity. However, a more 'upstream' response is required, including 'cash first' interventions as part of broader national strategies to end the need for food banks.

Using the candidacy framework to conceptualize systems and gaps when developing infant mental health (IMH) services: A qualitative study.

The development of infant mental health (IMH) services globally is still in its early stages. This qualitative study aims to understand the challenges of setting up IMH services and explores the views and experiences of 14 multi-disciplinary stakeholders who are part of the IMH implementation group in a large Scottish health board. Six major themes were identified through thematic analysis. This paper examines the most prominent theme "Systems" alongside the theme "Gaps in Current Service". The theoretical framework of "candidacy" is found to be a valuable way to conceptualize the complex systemic layers of micro, meso, and macro factors that contribute to the challenges of setting up services. At the micro level, key themes included the view that services must be accessible, individualized, and involve families. At the meso level, in line with the aims of the service, multiagency integration, aspects of early intervention, and clear operating conditions were all seen as important. Finally, at the macro level, perhaps the biggest challenge perceived by stakeholders is delivering a service that is entirely infant-focused. These findings will help inform policy makers about factors considered by professionals to be vital in the establishment of IMH services in Scotland and across the globe.

El desarrollo de los servicios de salud mental infantil (IMH) globalmente está aún en sus niveles básicos. Este estudio cualitativo se propone comprender los retos de establecer los servicios IMH y explora los puntos de vista y experiencias de 14 personas interesadas de múltiples disciplinas que son parte de un grupo de implementación de IMH dentro de una extensa junta de salud escocesa. A través de análisis temáticos se identificaron seis temas de mayor importancia. Este estudio examina el tema más prominente según la mayor percepción, "Sistemas," junto con el tema "Vacíos en la Actual Prestación de Servicio." Se estima que el marco teorético de trabajo de "candidatura," es una manera valiosa de conceptualizar los complejos niveles sistémicos de micro, medio y macro factores que contribuyen a los retos de establecer los servicios. Al nivel micro, los temas claves incluyen el punto de vista de que los servicios deben ser accesibles, individualizados y deben involucrar a las familias. Al nivel medio, alineados con las metas del servicio, la integración de agencias múltiples, aspectos de temprana intervención y claras condiciones operativas fueron todas estimadas como importantes. Finalmente, al nivel macro, quizás el mayor reto percibido por las personas interesadas es cumplir con el ofrecimiento de un servicio que esté enteramente enfocado en el infante. Estos resultados ayudarán a informar a quienes determinan las políticas a seguir acerca de los factores que los profesionales consideran vitales en el establecimiento de servicios IMH en Escocia y alrededor del globo.

Au niveau global, le développement de service de santé mentale du nourrisson et de la petite enfance en est encore à ses débuts. Cette étude qualitative s'est donnée pour but de comprendre les défis que pose l'installation de services IMH. Elle explore les vues et les perspectives de 14 parties prenantes de diverses disciplines qui font partie d'un groupe de mise en place IMH dans un grand conseil de santé en Ecosse. Six thèmes principaux ont été identifiés au travers une analyse thématique. Cet article examine le thème ayant été perçu comme le plus grand et proéminent, Systèmes, ainsi que le thème « Brèches dans les services actuels ¼. La structure théorique de la 'candidature' a été utilisée pour trouver une manière utile de conceptualiser les couches systémiques complexes de facteurs micro, méso, et macro qui contribuent aux défis qu'il y a dans l'installation de services. Au niveau micro, les thèmes clés ont inclus l'idée que les services doivent être accessibles, individualisés et engager les familles. Au niveau méso, s'alignant avec les buts du service, l'intégration de plusieurs agences, les aspects d'une intervention précoce et des conditions d'opération claires ont tous été estimé être importants. Enfin, au niveau macro, le défi étant peut-être le plus grand selon les parties prenantes est d'offrir un service qui est entièrement focalisé sur le nourrisson. Ces résultats aideront les décideurs pour ce qui s'agit des facteurs considérés comme étant vitaux par les professionnels pour ce qui concerne l'établissement de services IMH en Ecosse et au travers du globe.

Natural history of long-COVID in a nationwide, population cohort study.

Previous studies on the natural history of long-COVID have been few and selective. Without comparison groups, disease progression cannot be differentiated from symptoms originating from other causes. The Long-COVID in Scotland Study (Long-CISS) is a Scotland-wide, general population cohort of adults who had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection matched to PCR-negative adults. Serial, self-completed, online questionnaires collected information on pre-existing health conditions and current health six, 12 and 18 months after index test. Of those with previous symptomatic infection, 35% reported persistent incomplete/no recovery, 12% improvement and 12% deterioration. At six and 12 months, one or more symptom was reported by 71.5% and 70.7% respectively of those previously infected, compared with 53.5% and 56.5% of those never infected. Altered taste, smell and confusion improved over time compared to the never infected group and adjusted for confounders. Conversely, late onset dry and productive cough, and hearing problems were more likely following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

'Breaking the cycle': a qualitative study exploring general practitioners' views of infant mental health.

BACKGROUND: Infants living in areas of socioeconomic deprivation are more likely to have adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), which are associated with infant mental health (IMH) problems and poor physical and mental health outcomes throughout the life course. As part of the development of IMH services in Scotland, studies are being conducted to explore various stakeholders' perspectives. AIM: To understand the views and experiences of GPs working in socioeconomically deprived areas in relation to IMH. DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative study with GPs working in deprived urban communities in Scotland, UK. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 GPs from 11 practices. Transcribed interviews were thematically analysed, following the Braun and Clarke framework, using NVivo (version 12) software. RESULTS: The following three overarching themes are presented: (1) Deep End GPs' inherent understanding of IMH, owing to their placement in deprived communities and their under-recognised role in current IMH provision; (2) Factors influencing how communities might perceive IMH, including the potential associations of IMH with parental blame or judgement in areas of socioeconomic deprivation; and (3) Using previous experience to visualise future IMH service delivery, particularly improving on current shortcomings of connectivity and accessibility of services, to develop successful new services. CONCLUSION: GPs in areas of socioeconomic deprivation have a deep understanding of the issues affecting IMH, although do not necessarily relate to the term 'IMH'. New community-based IMH services are much needed, particularly in deprived areas. However, the pre-existing role of primary care must be recognised, supported, and integrated into new services, alongside training to increase IMH awareness among GPs and other primary healthcare professionals (HCPs).

'A drive to make change' - exploring the views and experiences of medical students engaging in advocacy: a qualitative study in a UK medical school.

BACKGROUND: Advocacy is a recognised competency for medical graduates. Many medical students engage in advocacy, but research on this topic is limited. This study aimed to explore the views and experiences of medical student advocates. METHODS: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Nine medical students from advocacy organisations were recruited by purposive sampling. Thematic analysis was used to generate codes and develop themes. RESULTS: There were five themes: triggers and enablers; barriers and disablers; knowledge, skills, and attributes; advocacy in the role of health professionals, and career aspirations; and teaching and assessment of advocacy. Triggers and enablers included internal drivers (e.g. experiencing injustice), and external drivers (e.g. role models). Obstacles included lack of institutional support, personal challenges, and discomfort around professionalism in advocacy. Student enhanced their knowledge of social issues and improved communication skills. Advocacy activities strongly influenced students' future plans. Most agreed that advocacy is an important topic in medical education, suggesting teaching it early in medical school via small-group tutorials and role-modelling. For assessment, a reflective approach was preferred over written exams. CONCLUSION: Medical students' engagement in advocacy has complex facilitators and barriers, and the relationship between advocacy and professionalism requires clarity. Benefits of advocacy include fostering empathy and other transferable skills required of future doctors. Advocacy teaching was welcomed by students, with suggested approaches proposed. The optimal learning and assessment strategy remains uncertain, and further research is needed.

Challenges in obtaining accurate anthropometric measures for adults with severe obesity: A community-based study.

AIMS: The number of people with severe obesity (BMI ⩾40 kg/m2) is increasing rapidly, but is poorly documented, partly as a result of inappropriate standard anthropometric measurement methods for community-based people. METHODS: As part of a broader study, people receiving care services and with severe obesity were visited at home. The people were assessed for measurements using different weighing scales and a standard portable stadiometer. If the stadiometer could not be used, their half arm span and knee height were measured to estimate their height using standard predictive equations. RESULTS: Measurements were taken for 15 women and 10 men (n = 25) aged 40-87 years (mean 62 years). Weights ranged from 98.4 to 211.8 kg (mean 150 kg), with 16 participants requiring bariatric scales. For the six people who were unable to stand, we used wheelchair scales (n = 1), bed weighing scales (n = 2), routine weights from care home records (n = 2) or weight data from hospital records (n = 1). The standard portable stadiometer could only be used for one person; the others required alternative measures from which to estimate height. Large body habitus obscured bony landmarks, meaning alternative measures gave diverse heights. Fourteen participants had a ⩾8 cm difference in height between estimates from half arm span and knee height measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Standard practice commonly does not provide reliable measurements for people with severe obesity, particularly those with mobility difficulties. An inability to measure weight and height accurately can exclude people from appropriate care, obscuring the true numbers affected and the effectiveness of future service planning. Safe community care requires the availability of specialist scales and standardised methods for height estimation appropriate for older and disabled people with severe obesity.

Tackling climate change and health inequalities in primary care.

The Climate Emergency is now widely accepted as the biggest public health crisis facing humanity. Previous research has highlighted how social and health inequalities shape the health impacts of climate change in the UK, but there has been little attention to the role of general practice in deprived areas. This Brief Report summarises a roundtable discussion of Scottish 'Deep End' GPs - family doctors working in the most socio-economically deprived areas - which took place weeks before the 26th UN Climate Change Conference (COP26), held in Glasgow in November 2021. The report highlights the need for urgent action to make general practice more sustainable, including recommendations for community engagement, (de)prescribing, medical education, digital inclusion, and investment in premises and capacity building.

Addressing health inequalities in diabetes through research: Recommendations from Diabetes UK's 2022 health inequalities in diabetes workshop.

AIMS: To develop a position statement which identifies research priorities to address health inequalities in diabetes and provides recommendations to researchers and research funders on how best to conduct research in these areas. METHODS: A two-day research workshop was conducted bringing together research experts in diabetes, research experts in health inequalities, healthcare professionals and people living with diabetes. RESULTS: The following key areas were identified as needing increased focus: How can we improve patient and public involvement and engagement to make diabetes research more inclusive of and relevant to diverse communities? How can we improve research design so that the people who could benefit most are represented? How can we use theories from implementation science to facilitate the uptake of research findings into routine practice to reach the populations with highest need? How can we collate and evaluate local innovation projects and disseminate best practice around tackling health inequalities in diabetes? How can we best collect and use data to address health inequalities in diabetes, including the harnessing of real-world and routinely collected data? How could research funders allocate funds to best address health inequalities in diabetes? How do we ensure the research community is representative of the general population? CONCLUSIONS: This position statement outlines recommendations to address the urgent need to tackle health inequalities in diabetes through research and calls on the diabetes research community to act upon these recommendations to ensure future research works to eliminate unfair and avoidable disparities in health.

Overlooked and under-evidenced: Community health and long-term care service needs, utilization, and costs incurred by people with severe obesity.

Numbers of people with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 ), with need for community health and long-term care (LTC) services, are increasing, but documentation is lacking. We identified individuals with severe obesity known to community health and care professionals in a representative United Kingdom region and used an investigator-administered questionnaire to record needs and use of community health and LTC services. Data were verified against health and LTC records. Local and published sources informed detailed micro-costing. Twenty-five individuals (15 women) consented, aged 40-87 (mean = 62) years, BMI 40-77 (mean = 55) kg/m2 : 20 participants (80%) were housebound. Twenty-two different cross-sector community health and LTC services were used, including community equipment service (n = 23), district nursing (n = 20), occupational therapy (n = 14), and LTC (n = 12). Twenty-four (96%) participants used three or more services, with longest care episode lasting over 14 years. Total annual service costs incurred by participants varied from £2053 to £82 792; mean £26 594 (lower estimate £80 064; mean £22 462/upper estimate £88 870; mean £30 726), with greatest costs being for LTC. Individual costs for equipment (currently provided) and home adaptations (ever provided) ranged widely, from zero to £35 946. Total mean annual costs increased by ascending BMI category, up to BMI 70 kg/m2 . This study provides a framework with which to inform service provision and economic analysis of weight management interventions. People with severe obesity may need sustained care from multiple community care services.

The Deep End GP Pioneer Scheme: a qualitative evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The Scottish Deep End Project is a collaboration between academic GPs and GPs in practices serving the most socio-economically disadvantaged populations in Scotland. The Deep End GP Pioneer Scheme was established in 2016 to improve GP recruitment and retention in these areas. The aim of this study was to qualitatively evaluate the experiences of participating lead GPs and GP fellows. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine lead GPs and 10 GP fellows, representing 12 of the 14 practices involved. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Five main themes are presented: Recruitment to the Pioneer Scheme; Work motivation and satisfaction; Mitigating health inequalities; Retention and changes in work pattern; and Suggestions for the future. Key ingredients of the scheme were the additional clinical capacity (addressing the inverse care law), protected time for both GP fellows and experienced GPs to lead on service development initiatives and to share learning within and between practices, and the shared ethos and values of the Scheme. CONCLUSIONS: There was strong support for the Scheme as a mechanism to improve GP recruitment and retention in areas of high socio-economic disadvantage, and to improve quality of care in these areas. As similar schemes are rolled out across the UK, there is a need for further research to evaluate their impact on workforce and patient outcomes in deprived areas.

Screening for Unstable Housing in a Healthcare Setting.

Objectives: To describe existing tools for screening patients for unstable housing in a healthcare setting. Methods: A literature search was completed to retrieve articles published in the last 10 years on screening patients for unstable housing in a healthcare setting. Results: The current literature on screening patients for homelessness in healthcare settings describes a variety of tools administered by a range of healthcare providers, but all are based in the United States. Conclusion: The studies revealed the potential for effective screening in healthcare settings and positive engagement of patients and providers with screening. Key areas for future research include innovative methods of screening and evaluation of reliability and validity for a broader range of tools.

Is Scotland's new GP contract addressing the inverse care law?

Scotland, like many countries around the world, has wide health inequalities resulting, in part, from the longstanding 'inverse care law', in which a mismatch between patient needs and provision of care in general practice in deprived areas results in poorer care and worse patient outcomes compared with affluent areas. In early 2018, Scotland embarked on a new GP contract, a stated aim of which was to reduce healthcare inequalities. National data on avoidable mortality showed a 4.8 (2019) and 4.9 (2021)-fold higher rate in the most deprived compared with the most affluent decile of the population. However, the distribution of whole-time equivalent (WTE) general practice clinicians per 10,000 patients, including GPs, and practice-employed practice nurses and other allied healthcare professionals, showed the opposite trend in both 2019 and 2022, with fewer WTE clinicians of all types in GP practices in deprived areas compared with affluent areas. These findings suggest that radical change is needed to reverse the inverse care law in Scotland.

Health inequalities, multimorbidity and primary care in Scotland.

Scotland has an ageing population and the widest health inequalities in Western Europe. Multiple health conditions develop ∼10-15 years earlier in deprived areas than in affluent areas. General practice is central to the effective and safe management of such complex multiple health conditions, but the inverse care law has permeated deprived communities ('Deep End' general practices) for the past 50 years. A new, radical, Scottish GP contract was introduced in April 2018, which has a vision to improve quality of care through cluster working and expansion of the multidisciplinary team (MDT), enabling GPs to deliver 'expert generalism' to patients with complex needs. It states a specific intention to address health inequalities and also to support the integration of health and social care. Here, we discuss recent evidence for whether the ambition of the new GP contract, to reduce health inequalities, is being achieved.