Echocardiography Does not Reduce Mortality in Sepsis: A Re-Evaluation Using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV Dataset.

OBJECTIVES: Echocardiography is commonly used for hemodynamic assessment in sepsis, but data regarding its association with outcome are conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between echocardiography and outcomes in patients with septic shock using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study comparing patients who did or did not undergo transthoracic echocardiography within the first 5 days of admission for the primary outcome of 28-day mortality. SETTING: Admissions to the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center intensive care from 2008 to 2019. PATIENTS: Adults 16 years old or older with septic shock requiring vasopressor support within 48 hours of admission. Readmissions and patients admitted to the coronary care unit or cardiovascular intensive care were excluded, as well as patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Echocardiography was performed in 1,515 (27%) of 5,697 eligible admissions. The primary outcome was analyzed using a marginal structural model and rolling entry matching to adjust for baseline and time-varying confounders. Patients who underwent echocardiography showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.09; 95% CI, 0.95-1.25; p = 0.24). This was consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses. Secondary outcomes were changes in management instituted within 4 hours of imaging. Treatment changes occurred in 493 patients (33%) compared with 431 matched controls (29%), with the most common intervention being the administration of a fluid bolus. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography in sepsis was not associated with a reduction in 28-day mortality based on observational data. These findings do not negate the utility of echo in cases of diagnostic uncertainty or inadequate response to initial treatment.

What Is the Optimal Speed of correction of the Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State in Diabetic Ketoacidosis? An Observational Cohort Study of U.S. Intensive Care Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The international guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) advise against rapid changes in osmolarity and glucose; however, the optimal rates of correction are unknown. We aimed to evaluate the rates of change in tonicity and glucose level in intensive care patients with DKA and their relationship with mortality and altered mental status. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study using 2 publicly available databases of U.S. intensive care patients (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV and Electronic Intensive Care Unit), evaluating adults with DKA and associated hyperosmolarity (baseline Osm ≥300 mOsm/L). The primary outcome was hospital mortality. The secondary neurologic outcome used a composite of diagnosed cerebral edema or Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤12. Multivariable regression models were used to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: On adjusted analysis, patients who underwent the most rapid correction of up to approximately 3 mmol/L/hour in tonicity had reduced mortality (n = 2307; odds ratio [OR], 0.21; overall P < .001) and adverse neurologic outcomes (OR, 0.44; P < .001). Faster correction of glucose levels up to 5 mmol/L/hour (90 mg/dL/hour) was associated with improvements in mortality (n = 2361; OR, 0.24; P = .020) and adverse neurologic events (OR, 0.52; P = .046). The number of patients corrected significantly faster than these rates was low. A maximal hourly rate of correction between 2 and 5 mmol/L for tonicity was associated with the lowest mortality rate on adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: Based on large-volume observational data, relatively rapid correction of tonicity and glucose level was associated with lower mortality and more favorable neurologic outcomes. Avoiding a maximum hourly rate of correction of tonicity >5 mmol/L may be advisable.