Incorporating integrative medicine and patient preferences into a pilot interdisciplinary sickle cell wellness clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder that includes acute pain episodes and chronic pain that can dramatically impact quality of life and goal-achievement. Our staff had limited success in connecting families with the Pain, Palliative Care and Integrative Medicine Clinic (PPCIM) to receive specialized skills for pain management. We created a partnership between Hematology and PPCIM to provide SCD patients/families with needed resources. DESIGN/SETTING: In 2016, key stakeholders collaborated to create a Sickle Cell Wellness Clinic (SCWC) clinic to provide families access to integrative medicine and wellness strategies. Design/structure, based on family focus group data and staff expertise, included a half-day, 7-discipline clinic housed in the PPCIM space. Patients with SCD, ages 8-20, learned strategies in an effort to improve health care utilization and increase overall quality of life. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/RESULTS: Feedback from two successful pilot clinics in 2017 was incorporated into the formal roll-out of SCWC in 2018. SCWCs continued monthly for one year, serving a total of 20 families post-pilot. SCD patients increased follow-up appointment engagement in the PPCIM clinic following SCWC and reported high levels of satisfaction with their healthcare experience. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to run a multidisciplinary clinic focused on pain management, coping skills, and healthy living with SCD. Providers benefited from the opportunity to collaborate with other disciplines. Patient and family feedback was positive, highlighted benefits of being introduced to new modalities, and reported advantages of meeting other patients/families in a new setting.

End points for sickle cell disease clinical trials: renal and cardiopulmonary, cure, and low-resource settings.

To address the global burden of sickle cell disease and the need for novel therapies, the American Society of Hematology partnered with the US Food and Drug Administration to engage the work of 7 panels of clinicians, investigators, and patients to develop consensus recommendations for clinical trial end points. The panels conducted their work through literature reviews, assessment of available evidence, and expert judgment focusing on end points related to patient-reported outcome, pain (non-patient-reported outcomes), the brain, end-organ considerations, biomarkers, measurement of cure, and low-resource settings. This article presents the findings and recommendations of the end-organ considerations, measurement of cure, and low-resource settings panels as well as relevant findings and recommendations from the biomarkers panel.

Hydroxyurea use in young infants with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyurea (HU) reduces complications and improves quality and duration of life in sickle cell disease. Evidence supports the use of HU starting after nine months of age. PROCEDURES: We performed a retrospective study of patients starting HU at less than five years of age between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016. We evaluated clinical events, laboratory data, and toxicity between three different age groups: cohort 1 (0-1 year), cohort 2 (1-2 years), and cohort 3 (2-5 years). RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 7.2 months (n = 35), 19.5 months (n = 13), and 35.5 months (n = 17) for cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Cohort 1 had higher hemoglobin (P = 0.0003) and MCV (P = 0.0199) and lower absolute reticulocyte count (P = 0.0304) at 24 months of age compared with cohort 3. The absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was lower compared with both older cohorts (P = 0.0364, 0.0025). The mean baseline hemoglobin F in cohort 1 was 31.5% compared with 19.7% and 16.5% in cohorts 2 and 3, respectively (P = 0.002, P < 0.0001). The mean duration of therapy was 31.3 months, 57.6 months (P = 0.018), and 29.1 months (P = 0.401), respectively. Mean Hb F levels remained higher in cohort 1 (29.9%) compared with cohorts 2 and 3 (20.4%, P = 0.007; 20.6%, P = 0.003). Cohort 1 experienced fewer hospitalizations (P = 0.0025), pain crises (P = 0.0618), and transfusions (P = 0.0426). There was no difference in toxicity between groups. CONCLUSION: HU is safe and effective in patients 5 to 12 months of age and generated a more robust response compared with initiation in older patients.