ABSTRACT
We tested the feasibility and oncological outcomes after penile-sparing surgery (PSS) for local recurrent penile cancer after a previous glansectomy/partial penectomy. We retrospectively analysed 13 patients (1997-2022) with local recurrence of penile cancer after a previous glansectomy or partial penectomy. All patients underwent PSS: circumcision, excision, or laser ablation. First, technical feasibility, treatment setting, and complications (Clavien-Dindo) were recorded. Second, Kaplan-Meier plots depicted overall and local recurrences over time. Overall, 11 (84.5%) vs. 2 (15.5%) patients were previously treated with glansectomy vs. partial penectomy. The median (IQR) time to disease recurrence was 56 (13-88) months. Six (46%) vs. two (15.5%) vs. five (38.5%) patients were treated with, respectively, local excision vs. local excision + circumcision vs. laser ablation. All procedures, except one, were performed in an outpatient setting. Only one Clavien-Dindo 2 complication was recorded. The median follow-up time was 41 months. Overall, three (23%) vs. four (30.5%) patients experienced local vs. overall recurrence, respectively. All local recurrences were safely treated with salvage surgery. In conclusion, we reported the results of a preliminary analysis testing safety, feasibility, and early oncological outcomes of PSS procedures for patients with local recurrence after previous glansectomy or partial penectomy. Stronger oncological outcomes should be tested in other series to optimise patient selection.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease with multisystem involvement, dominated by a general fibrosis. The early stage of the disease is associated with progressive damage to microcirculation, particularly in the respiratory tract, the gastrointestinal tract and skin. The face assumes a typical appearance characterized by microstomia (reduction of mouth opening) and microcheilia (thinning of the lips). These conditions cause a considerable reduction in performance status of patients. We treated them by fat grafting, rich in adipose stem cells, and we evaluated through time clinical, functional and aesthetic evaluation of oral pathology associated with SSc. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From September 2014 to May 2016, we enrolled and treated seven patients in the plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery clinic. Through time, we evaluated the following parameters: evaluation of mouth opening (maximum opening in superior-inferior and lateral directions) and lip thicknesses, both measured by doctors of the aforementioned operating unit; variation in the quality of life as perceived by patients according to the MHISS scale (Mouth Handicap Systemic Sclerosis); variation in severity of labial fibrosis assessed by microscopic analysis of pre- and post-fat transfer samples in the pathology clinic; safety of the protocol, according to the management of side effects resulting from the procedure; aesthetic evaluation, made by external observers and non-experts in the field, on pre- and post-operative photographs. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We reported satisfying results, both functionally and aesthetically, for all parameters except one, for which the sample size might have proven critical. These data should be a starting point for further experimental research and clinical trials. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .