Comparison of proactive and conventional treatment of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: a multicentre retrospective cohort series.

PURPOSE: Comparative studies on efficacy of treatment strategies for anastomotic leakage (AL) after low anterior resection (LAR) are almost non-existent. This study aimed to compare different proactive and conservative treatment approaches for AL after LAR. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with AL after LAR in three university hospitals. Different treatment approaches were compared, including a pairwise comparison of conventional treatment and endoscopic vacuum-assisted surgical closure (EVASC). Primary outcomes were healed and functional anastomosis rates at end of follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 103 patients were included, of which 59 underwent conventional treatment and 23 EVASC. Median number of reinterventions was 1 after conventional treatment, compared to 7 after EVASC (p < 0.01). Median follow-up was 39 and 25 months, respectively. Healed anastomosis rate was 61% after conventional treatment, compared to 78% after EVASC (p = 0.139). Functional anastomosis rate was higher after EVASC, compared to conventional treatment (78% vs. 54%, p = 0.045). Early initiation of EVASC in the first week after primary surgery resulted in better functional anastomosis rate compared to later initiation (100% vs. 55%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Proactive treatment of AL consisting of EVASC resulted in improved healed and functional anastomosis rates for AL after LAR for rectal cancer, compared to conventional treatment. If EVASC was initiated within the first week after index surgery, a 100% functional anastomosis rate was achievable.

A comparative multicentre study evaluating gluteal turnover flap for wound closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare perineal wound healing between gluteal turnover flap and primary closure in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent APR for primary or recurrent rectal cancer with gluteal turnover flap in two university hospitals (2016-2021) were compared to a multicentre cohort of primary closure (2000-2017). The primary endpoint was uncomplicated perineal wound healing within 30 days. Secondary endpoints were long-term wound healing, related re-interventions, and perineal herniation. The perineal hernia rate was assessed using Kaplan Meier analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients had a gluteal turnover flap and 194 had primary closure. The uncomplicated perineal wound-healing rate within 30 days was 68% (17/25) after gluteal turnover flap versus 64% (124/194) after primary closure, OR 2.246; 95% CI 0.734-6.876; p = 0.156 in multivariable analysis. No major wound complications requiring surgical re-intervention occurred after flap closure. Eighteen patients with gluteal turnover flap completed 12-month follow-up, and none of them had chronic perineal sinus, compared to 6% (11/173) after primary closure (p = 0.604). The symptomatic 18-month perineal hernia rate after flap closure was 0%, compared to 9% after primary closure (p = 0.184). CONCLUSIONS: The uncomplicated perineal wound-healing rate after the gluteal turnover flap and primary closure after APR is similar, and no chronic perineal sinus or perineal hernia occurred after flap closure. Future studies have to confirm potential benefits of the gluteal turnover flap.

Optimizing omentoplasty for management of chronic pelvic sepsis by intra-operative fluorescence angiography: a comparative cohort study.

AIM: Pelviperineal wound complications frequently occur after salvage surgery for chronic pelvic sepsis despite using an omentoplasty. Sufficient perfusion of the omentoplasty following mobilization is essential for proper healing. This study investigated the impact on short-term clinical outcomes of fluorescence angiography (FA) using indocyanine green for assessment of omental perfusion in patients undergoing salvage surgery. METHOD: This was a comparative cohort study including consecutive patients who underwent combined abdominal and transanal minimally invasive salvage surgery with omentoplasty at a national referral centre for chronic pelvic sepsis between December 2014 and August 2019. The historical and interventional cohorts were defined based on the date of introduction of FA in April 2018. The primary outcome was pelviperineal non-healing, defined by the presence of any degree of pelviperineal infection at the final postoperative evaluation. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients underwent salvage surgery with omentoplasty for chronic pelvic sepsis, of whom 52 did not have FA and 36 did have FA. The underlying primary disease was Crohn's disease (n = 50) or rectal cancer (n = 38), with even distribution among the cohorts (P = 0.811). FA led to a change in management in 28/36 (78%) patients. After a median of 89 days, pelviperineal non-healing was observed in 22/52 (42%) patients in the cohort without FA and in 8/36 (22%) patients in the cohort with FA (P = 0.051). Omental necrosis was found during reoperation in 3/52 and 0/36 patients, respectively (P = 0.266). CONCLUSION: After introduction of FA to assess perfusion of the omentoplasty, halving of the pelviperineal non-healing rate was observed in patients undergoing salvage surgery for chronic pelvic sepsis.

Further insights into the treatment of perineal hernia based on a the experience of a single tertiary centre.

AIM: There is little evidence concerning the optimal surgical technique for the repair of perineal hernia. This study aimed to report on the evolution of a technique for repair of perineal hernia by analysing the experience in a tertiary referral centre. METHOD: This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal excision in a tertiary referral centre. The main study end-points were rate of recurrent perineal hernia, perineal wound complications and related re-intervention. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included: in 18 patients a biological mesh was used followed by 16 patients who underwent synthetic mesh repair. Postoperative perineal wound infection occurred in two patients (11%) after biological mesh repair compared with four (25%) after synthetic mesh repair (P = 0.387). None of the meshes were explanted. Recurrent perineal hernia following biological mesh was found in 7 of 18 patients (39%) after a median of 33 months. The recurrence rate with a synthetic mesh was 5 of 16 patients (31%) after a median of 17 months (P = 0.642). Re-repair was performed in four (22%) and two patients (13%), respectively (P = 0.660). Eight patients required a transposition flap reconstruction to close the perineum over the mesh, and no recurrent hernias were observed in this subgroup (P = 0.030). No mesh-related small bowel complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Recurrence rates after perineal hernia repair following abdominoperineal excision were high, and did not seem to be related to the type of mesh. If a transposition flap was added to the mesh repair no recurrences were observed, but this finding needs confirmation in larger studies.

Feasibility of a subcutaneous gluteal turnover flap without donor site scar for perineal closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) carries a high risk of perineal wound morbidity. Perineal wound closure using autologous tissue flaps has been shown to be advantageous, but there is no consensus as to the optimal method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel gluteal turnover flap (GT-flap) without donor site scar for perineal closure after APR. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent APR for primary or recurrent rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomised pilot study in two academic centres. Perineal reconstruction consisted of a unilateral subcutaneous GT-flap, followed by midline closure. Feasibility was defined as uncomplicated perineal wound healing at 30 days in at least five patients, and a maximum of two flap failures. RESULTS: Out of 17 potentially eligible patients, 10 patients underwent APR with GT-flap-assisted perineal wound closure. Seven patients had pre-operative radiotherapy. Median-added theatre time was 38 min (range 35-44 min). Two patients developed a superficial perineal wound dehiscence, most likely because of the excessive width of the skin island. Two other patients developed purulent discharge and excessive serosanguinous discharge, respectively, resulting in four complicated wounds at 30 days. No flap failure occurred, and no radiological or surgical reinterventions were performed. Median length of hospital stay was 10 days (IQR 8-12 days). CONCLUSIONS: The GT-flap for routine perineal wound closure after APR seems feasible with limited additional theatre time, but success seems to depend on correct planning of the width of the flap. The potential for reducing perineal morbidity should be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.

Near-infrared fluorescence angiography for intra-operative assessment of pedicled omentoplasty for filling of a pelvic cavity: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: During creation of a pedicled omentoplasty, blood flow to segments of the omentum might become compromised. If unrecognized, this can lead to omental necrosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential added intra-operative value of the use of fluorescence angiography (FA) with indocyanine green (ICG) to assess omental perfusion. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing a pedicled omentoplasty in a 6-month period (April 1 2018-October 1 2018) in a University hospital were included. The primary outcome was change in management due to FA. Secondary outcomes included the amount of additionally resected omentum, added surgical time, and quantitative fluorescent values (time to fluorescent enhancement, contrast quantification). RESULTS: Fifteen patients had pelvic surgery with omentoplasty and FA. Change in management occurred in 12 patients (80%) and consisted of resecting a median of 44 g (range 12-198 g) of poorly perfused omental areas that were not visible by conventional white light. The median added surgical time for the use of FA and subsequent management was 8 min (range 3-39 min). The first fluorescent signal in the omental tissue appeared after a median of 20 s (range 9-37 s) after injection of ICG. The median signal-to-baseline ratio was 23.7 (interquartile range 12.2-29.7) in well perfused and 2.5 (interquartile range 1.7-4.0) in poorly perfused tissue. CONCLUSIONS: FA of a pedicled omentoplasty allows a real-time assessment of omental perfusion and leads to change in management in 80% of the cases in this pilot study. These findings support the conduct of larger studies to determine the impact on patient outcome in this setting.

Impact of an institutional change from routine to highly selective diversion of a low anastomosis after TME for rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The need for routine diverting ileostomy following restorative total mesorectal excision (TME) is increasingly debated as the benefits might not outweigh the disadvantages. This study evaluated an institutional shift from routine (RD) to highly selective diversion (HSD) after TME surgery for rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients having TME with primary anastomosis and HSD for low or mid rectal cancer between December 2014 and March 2017 were compared with a historical control group with RD in the preceding period since January 2011. HSD was introduced in conjunction with uptake of transanal TME. RESULTS: In the RD group, 45/50 patients (90%) had a primary diverting stoma, and 3/40 patients (8%) in the HSD group. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 10 (20%) and three (8%) cases after a median follow-up of 36 and 19 months after RD and HSD, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality. An unintentional stoma beyond 1 year postoperative was present in six and two patients, respectively. One-year stoma-related readmission and reoperation rate (including reversal) after RD were 84% and 86%, respectively. Corresponding percentages were significantly lower after HSD (17% and 17%; P < 0.001). Total hospital stay within one year was median 11 days (IQR 8-19) versus 5 days (IQR 4-11), respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This single institutional comparative cohort study shows that highly selective defunctioning of a low anastomosis in rectal cancer patients did not adversely affect incidence or consequences of anastomotic leakage with a substantial decrease in 1-year readmission and reintervention rate, leading to an overall significantly reduced hospital stay.