Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 141(6): 609-610, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37166824

ABSTRACT

This case report describes a patient with a chronic urinary tract infection whose long-term treatment for right eye redness, discharge, pain, and decreased vision ultimately led to hospitalization and Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to multiple antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial , Conjunctivitis , Pseudomonas Infections , Humans , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Conjunctivitis/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis/drug therapy , Pseudomonas Infections/diagnosis , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
2.
Br Dent J ; 234(8): 593-600, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37117367

ABSTRACT

Introduction The purpose of this study was to test the short-term efficacy of four commercial mouthwashes versus water in reducing SARS-CoV-2 viral load in the oral cavity over clinically relevant time points.Methods In total, 32 subjects that were proven SARS-CoV-2-positive via polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostic test were recruited and randomised into five parallel arms. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were compared in saliva samples between the groups, as well as within the groups at baseline (pre-rinse), zero hours, one hour and two hours post-rinse, using SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR analysis.Results We observed a significant increase in Ct values in saliva samples collected immediately after rinsing with all the four mouthwashes - 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, 1.5% hydrogen peroxide, 1% povidone iodine, or Listerine - compared to water. A sustained increase in Ct values for up to two hours was only observed in the Listerine and chlorohexidine gluconate groups. We were not able to sufficiently power this clinical trial, so the results remain notional but encouraging and supportive of findings in other emerging mouthwash studies on COVID-19, warranting additional investigations.Conclusions Our evidence suggests that in a clinical setting, prophylactic rinses with Listerine or chlorhexidine gluconate can potentially reduce SARS-CoV-2 viral load in the oral cavity for up to two hours. While limited in statistical power due to the difficulty in obtaining this data, we advocate for pre-procedural mouthwashing, like handwashing, as an economical and safe additional precaution to help mitigate the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from a potentially infected patient to providers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , COVID-19/prevention & control , Viral Load
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL