ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite the epidemiological and economic relevance of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), there is a lack of research on what the general public knows and thinks about this condition (IBS literacy). Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore public knowledge and beliefs about IBS in Germany. Moreover, associations of knowledge and beliefs about IBS with socio-demographic characteristics as well as illness and treatment experiences were analysed. METHODS: Analyses made use of a national telephone survey (N = 1,205). A carefully developed vignette describing a person with typical symptoms of IBS was presented. Respondents were then asked to name the disease in question and beliefs about causes and treatment options were assessed. For the analyses respondents were divided into three groups: (1) people who never had IBS symptoms, (2) people who had or have IBS symptoms but never were in treatment and (3) individuals who reported to be or have been treated for IBS symptoms. RESULTS: Less than 4% of the respondents recognized IBS after presentation of the vignette. About 75% positively evaluated treatability while psychotherapy was evaluated more effective than medication. Stress and unhealthy lifestyle were the most frequently endorsed possible causes of the presented IBS symptoms. There were variations in knowledge and beliefs about IBS according to age, gender, and education. We found minor differences in beliefs and knowledge between individuals who had or have symptoms but never were in treatment and those without respective illness experience. Respondents with illness/treatment experiences rated their knowledge significantly better than those without any experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate low levels of public knowledge about IBS regarding illness recognition in Germany. A majority disagreed that they have good knowledge about IBS symptoms. Against this background, it seems reasonable to develop and test interventions to improve IBS literacy by increasing knowledge about symptoms, causes and treatment options.
Subject(s)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , GermanyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: After allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), urinary levels of 3-indoxyl sulfate (3-IS) correlate with the relative abundance of bacteria from the class Clostridia (RAC), and antibiotic treatment is considered the major determinant of this outcome. A high RAC has been associated with favorable outcome after allo-HCT and protection from Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). We assessed correlations between alpha diversity, RAC and urinary 3-IS levels in a non-allo-HCT clinical cohort of antibiotic treated patients to further explore 3-IS as a biomarker of reduced diversity and predisposition to CDI. METHODS: Fecal and urinary specimens were analyzed from 40 non-allo-HCT hospitalized patients before and 9 ± 2 days after initiation of intravenous antibiotic treatment. Fecal microbiota were analyzed by 16s RNA sequencing and urinary 3-IS was analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of 3-IS. RESULTS: At a RAC cutoff of <30%, the binary logarithm of 3-IS (medium 3-IS: ≤2.5; high 3-IS: >2.5) was predictive with an accuracy of 82% (negative predictive value: 87%, positive predictive value 67%). Accuracy was improved by combing antibiotic history with 3-IS levels (accuracy 89%, npv 88%, ppv 92%). CONCLUSION: In conjunction with patient antibiotic history, 3-IS is a candidate marker to predict RAC.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers/urine , Clostridiales/classification , Clostridiales/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Indican/urine , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Biodiversity , Clostridiales/drug effects , Clostridiales/genetics , Cohort Studies , Feces/microbiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Increased insulin resistance (IR), associated with specific antiretroviral drugs or drug classes, is an established risk factor for type 2 diabetes in HIV patients, ultimately increasing morbidity and mortality. To date, data on the risk of IR in tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-based protocols are unavailable. METHODS: This prospective randomized, open-label study evaluated the effects of IR on 30 healthy volunteers receiving fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF), elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) or rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (R/F/TAF). IR was measured before and after 14-day treatments using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycaemic clamp technique (HEGC). Changes in IR in each group were evaluated using the mean glucose disposal rate, normalized with body weight (MBW [mg glucose/(min×kg)]). RESULTS: A total of 30 subjects underwent randomization: one subject in the F/TAF arm withdrew consent after randomization and one in the R/F/TAF arm had to be excluded because of technical failure during HEGC, resulting in 28 subjects in the per-protocol population (F/TAF, n=9 subjects; E/C/F/TAF, n=10 subjects; R/F/TAF n=9 subjects). No significant differences were detected on the baseline characteristics. IR did not differ among the groups before treatment. None of the studied antiretroviral combinations resulted in a significant change in IR after 14 days compared with baseline values, as measured by MBW (F/TAF, 11.42 ±3.04 mean [±sd] versus 11.43 ±3.23, P=0.49; E/C/F/TAF, 10.04 ±2.49 versus 10.95 ±4.26, P=0.30; R/F/TAF, 11.03 ±1.96 versus 13.01 ±4.11, P=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment for F/TAF, E/C/F/TAF or R/F/TAF did not increase IR in healthy male volunteers.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacokinetics , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination/pharmacokinetics , Insulin Resistance/physiology , Rilpivirine/pharmacokinetics , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/blood , Body Weight , Drug Combinations , Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination/blood , Emtricitabine , Glucose Clamp Technique , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Rilpivirine/blood , TenofovirABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive self-help guidebook on the disease related quality of life for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The secondary aim was to evaluate whether the guidebook is less effective in IBS patients with depression, somatization disorder or panic disorder as a psychiatric comorbidity. METHODS: Prospective observational study. At baseline (t1), patients filled in the ´Functional Digestive Disorders Quality of Life´ (FDDQL) questionnaire and received the IBS guidebook together with an explanation of its content and use. Depression, anxiety and somatization were evaluated with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). Three (t2) and six months (t3) later, the questionnaire was sent by mail to the patients for follow-up evaluation. Data were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: 71 patients participated (74.6% female). 53 (74.6%) completed the final assessment at t3 after 6 months. The global FDDQL score increased from 49.3 (SD 12.7) at t1 to 64.3 (SD 16.0) at t3 (p < 0.001). There was a significant between-subjects effect on the global FDDQL score related to depression (p = 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.001) and somatization (p = 0.011). Thus, the quality of life of patients with psychosomatic comorbidity was lower at baseline, but showed a similar increase within the following six months. CONCLUSION: The self-help guidebook significantly improved measured quality of life for IBS patients. The use of screening questionnaires like PHQ might be valuable to identify patients with more complex problems. This might be helpful for them to intensify and adapt therapy. Further research has to evaluate if patients with psychological comorbidity are treated more effectively when they receive psychotherapy or specific medication in addition to the self-management guidebook.