Validating computationally predicted TMS stimulation areas using direct electrical stimulation in patients with brain tumors near precentral regions.

The spatial extent of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is of paramount interest for all studies employing this method. It is generally assumed that the induced electric field is the crucial parameter to determine which cortical regions are excited. While it is difficult to directly measure the electric field, one usually relies on computational models to estimate the electric field distribution. Direct electrical stimulation (DES) is a local brain stimulation method generally considered the gold standard to map structure-function relationships in the brain. Its application is typically limited to patients undergoing brain surgery. In this study we compare the computationally predicted stimulation area in TMS with the DES area in six patients with tumors near precentral regions. We combine a motor evoked potential (MEP) mapping experiment for both TMS and DES with realistic individual finite element method (FEM) simulations of the electric field distribution during TMS and DES. On average, stimulation areas in TMS and DES show an overlap of up to 80%, thus validating our computational physiology approach to estimate TMS excitation volumes. Our results can help in understanding the spatial spread of TMS effects and in optimizing stimulation protocols to more specifically target certain cortical regions based on computational modeling.

Robot-assisted image-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation for somatotopic mapping of the motor cortex: a clinical pilot study.

PURPOSE: Shape and exact location of motor cortical areas varies among individuals. The exact knowledge of these locations is crucial for planning of neurosurgical procedures. In this study, we have used robot-assisted image-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (Ri-TMS) to elicit MEP response recorded for individual muscles and reconstruct functional motor maps of the primary motor cortex. METHODS: One healthy volunteer and five patients with intracranial tumors neighboring the precentral gyrus were selected for this pilot study. Conventional MRI and fMRI were obtained. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was performed using a MagPro X100 stimulator and a standard figure-of-eight coil positioned by an Adept Viper s850 robot. The fMRI activation/Ri-TMS response pattern were compared. In two cases, Ri-TMS was additionally compared to intraoperative direct electrical cortical stimulation. RESULTS: Maximal MEP response of the m. abductor digiti minimi was located in an area corresponding to the "hand knob" of the precentral gyrus for both hemispheres. Repeated Ri-TMS measurements showed a high reproducibility. Simultaneous registration of the MEP response for m. brachioradialis, m. abductor pollicis brevis, and m. abductor digiti minimi demonstrated individual peak areas of maximal MEP response for the individual muscle groups. Ri-TMS mapping was compared to the corresponding fMRI studies. The areas of maximal MEP response localized within the "finger tapping" activated areas by fMRI in all six individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Ri-TMS is suitable for high resolution non-invasive preoperative somatotopic mapping of the motor cortex. Ri-TMS may help in the planning of neurosurgical procedures and may be directly used in navigation systems.

Intra-osseous ultrasound for pedicle screw positioning in the subaxial cervical spine: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to other regions of the human spine, dorsal fixation with rods and pedicle screws is comparatively rarely performed in the cervical spine. Although this technique provides a higher mechanical strength than the more frequently used lateral mass screws, many surgeons fear the relatively high rate of misplacements. This higher incidence is mainly due to the complex vertebral anatomy in this spinal segment. For correct screw placement, the availability of an immediate and efficient intra-operative imaging tool to ascertain the accuracy of the pedicle screw hole position would be beneficial. We have previously investigated the usefulness of an intraspinal, specifically, intra-osseous ultrasound technique in the lumbar spine. In this study its accuracy as a means of controlling intrapedicular screw hole positioning has been evaluated in the cervical spine. METHODS: An endovascular ultrasound transducer was used for the intra-luminal scanning of 54 pedicle screw holes in cadaveric human spine specimens. Twenty-three of these had been intentionally misplaced (cortex breached). The resulting image files were assessed by three investigators blinded to both the procedure and the corresponding CT findings. FINDINGS: The investigators differentiated correctly between adequately and poorly placed pedicle screw holes in 96% of cases. False negatives and false positives both occurred in no more than 1.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Intrapedicular ultrasonography of pedicle screw holes in the cervical spine is a promising technique for the intra-operative assessment of bore hole placement and may increase operative safety and postoperative outcome in posterior cervical fusion surgery.

Intraosseous ultrasonography to determine the accuracy of drill hole positioning prior to the placement of pedicle screws: an experimental study.

OBJECT: Dorsal fixation with rods and pedicle screws (PSs) is the most frequently used surgery to correct traumatic and degenerative instabilities of the human spine. Prior to screw placement, screw holes are drilled along the vertebral pedicles. Despite the use of a variety of techniques, misplacement of screw holes, and consequently of the PSs, is a common problem. The authors investigated the usefulness of an intraspinal, intraosseous ultrasonography technique to determine the accuracy of drill hole positioning. METHODS: An endovascular ultrasound transducer was used for the intraluminal scanning of bore holes in trabecular bovine bone, 12 pedicle drill holes in cadaveric human spine, and 4 pedicle drill holes in a patient undergoing thoracic spondylodesis. Seven of the experimental bore holes in the cadaveric spine were placed optimally (that is, inside the pedicle) and 5 were placed suboptimally (breaching the medial or lateral cortical surface of the pedicle). Computed tomography scans were obtained in the patient and cadaveric specimen after the procedure. RESULTS: The image quality achieved in examinations of native bovine bone tissue, the formalin-fixed human spine specimen, and human vertebrae in vivo was equal. The authors endosonographically identified correct intrapedicular and intravertebral positions as well as poor (cortex breached) placement of drill holes. CONCLUSIONS: Intraosseous ultrasonography is a promising technique for the investigation of PS holes prior to screw implantation, and may add to the safety of PS placement.

Intraosseous ultrasound in the placement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Experimental and intraoperative evaluation of the efficiency of a novel technique. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of pedicle screw hole placements before screw implantation in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Deviations from planned trajectories occur in a significant number of screw placements in posterior lumbar fixation. Several techniques have been proposed to minimize this complication, although none has gained general acceptance. This may be due to costs associated with their implementation or considerably extended operating times required by some techniques. METHODS: Pedicle screw holes were placed in 24 pedicles of 2 postmortem human lumbar spine specimens. Sixteen optimal trajectories were placed and 8 intentional cortical breaches. Each pedicular drill hole was examined using a 360 degrees ultrasound transducer and CT scanning. The ultrasonographic images were reviewed by 3 independent investigators who were blinded to the CT findings. In addition, 20 screw holes were placed intraoperatively in 3 patients, and equally assessed by intraoperative intraosseous ultrasonography and postoperative CT scanning. RESULTS: Ultrasonographic images of pedicle screw holes in postmortem human spine specimen were correctly interpreted in 99% of cases. No cortical breech was missed, i.e., no false-negatives occurred. Intraoperative findings closely matched the experimental data. None of the intraoperative ultrasound scans demonstrated a cortical breach, a finding confirmed by postoperative CT. The intraoperative time required for the ultrasonographic analysis of each pedicle was about 1 minute and the interpretation of the resulting images was judged intuitive by the evaluating neurosurgeons. CONCLUSION: Intraosseous ultrasound is a highly reliable technique for the intraoperative assessment of pedicle screw holes before pedicle screw placement. Additional expenses with respect to procedure time and manpower are minimal.