Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 63(4): 381-94, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24487961

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Survivin is a member of the inhibitor-of-apoptosis family. Essential for tumor cell survival and overexpressed in most cancers, survivin is a promising target for anti-cancer immunotherapy. Immunogenicity has been demonstrated in multiple cancers. Nonetheless, few clinical trials have demonstrated survivin-vaccine-induced immune responses. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This phase I trial was conducted to test whether vaccine EMD640744, a cocktail of five HLA class I-binding survivin peptides in Montanide(®) ISA 51 VG, promotes anti-survivin T-cell responses in patients with solid cancers. The primary objective was to compare immunologic efficacy of EMD640744 at doses of 30, 100, and 300 µg. Secondary objectives included safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy. RESULTS: In total, 49 patients who received ≥2 EMD640744 injections with available baseline- and ≥1 post-vaccination samples [immunologic-diagnostic (ID)-intention-to-treat] were analyzed by ELISpot- and peptide/MHC-multimer staining, revealing vaccine-activated peptide-specific T-cell responses in 31 patients (63 %). This cohort included the per study protocol relevant ID population for the primary objective, i.e., T-cell responses by ELISpot in 17 weeks following first vaccination, as well as subjects who discontinued the study before week 17 but showed responses to the treatment. No dose-dependent effects were observed. In the majority of patients (61 %), anti-survivin responses were detected only after vaccination, providing evidence for de novo induction. Best overall tumor response was stable disease (28 %). EMD640744 was well tolerated; local injection-site reactions constituted the most frequent adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination with EMD640744 elicited T-cell responses against survivin peptides in the majority of patients, demonstrating the immunologic efficacy of EMD640744.


Subject(s)
Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins/immunology , Neoplasms/therapy , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Vaccination , Cancer Vaccines/administration & dosage , Cancer Vaccines/adverse effects , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic , Female , HLA-A Antigens/immunology , HLA-B7 Antigen/immunology , Humans , Interferon-gamma Release Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Proteins/immunology , Neoplasms/immunology , Peptide Fragments/immunology , Survivin , T-Cell Antigen Receptor Specificity
3.
Acta Oncol ; 50(7): 1105-10, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21184645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The broad spectrum of antitumor activity of both the oral platinum analogue satraplatin (S) and capecitabine (C), along with the advantage of their oral administration, prompted a clinical study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four dose levels of S (mg/m(2)/day) and C (mg/m(2)/day) were evaluated in adult patients with advanced solid tumors: 60/1650, 80/1650, 60/2000, 70/2000; a course consisted of 28 days with sequential administration of S (days 1-5) and C (days 8-21) followed by one week rest. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were treated, 24 in the dose escalation and 13 in the expansion phase; at the MTD, defined at S 70/C 2000, two patients presented dose limiting toxicities: lack of recovery of neutropenia by day 42 and nausea with dose skip of C. Most frequent toxicities were nausea (57%), diarrhea (51%), neutropenia (46%), anorexia, fatigue, vomiting (38% each). Two partial responses were observed in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer and one in prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: At S 70/C 2000 the combination of sequential S and C is tolerated with manageable toxicities; its evaluation in platinum and fluorouracil sensitive tumor types is worthwhile because of the easier administration and lack of nephro- and neurotoxicity as compared to parent compounds.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Fluorouracil/analogs & derivatives , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Capecitabine , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Disease Progression , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fatigue/chemically induced , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Nausea/chemically induced , Neoplasms/pathology , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effects , Vomiting/chemically induced
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL