Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 148
Filter
1.
J Clin Neurosci ; 59: 47-50, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30487056

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the subdural haematoma recurrence rate in patients with symptomatic chronic subdural haematomas (CSDH) treated with either burr hole trephination (BHT) or minicraniotomy (MC) and to determine whether a statistically significant difference exists between the two techniques. A retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with symptomatic CSDH treated with BHT or MC at the John Hunter Hospital Neurosurgery Department between July 2004 and July 2016 was performed. After inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, 368 patients with 439 CSDHs were eligible. Baseline demographic data was recorded for all patients. Statistical analysis was performed assessing haematoma recurrence as the primary outcome and mortality as a secondary outcome. Three hundred and sixty eight patients were included in the study, with 225 being treated with MC and 143 with BHT. Baseline demographic data was similar between the two groups. The recurrence rate for patients treated with BHT was 0.13 (95% CI 0.08-0.18), versus 0.18 (95% CI 0.13-0.23) in the MC group. This difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates between the two groups. The mortality rate in the BHT group was 0.09 (95% CI 0.05-0.14) versus 0.09 (95% CI 0.05-0.13) in the MC group. In our series there was no difference in recurrence rates or mortality rates between the two groups, suggesting MC is an effective alternative to BHT in the management of symptomatic CSDH.


Subject(s)
Drainage/adverse effects , Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Trephining/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Drainage/methods , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Trephining/methods
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 27(3): 873-879, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26650377

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: We assessed the ability of a fracture liaison service (FLS) to directly reduce re-fracture risk. Having a FLS is associated with a ∼40% reduction in the 3-year risk of major bone and ∼30% of any bone re-fracture. The number needed to treat to prevent a re-fracture is 20. INTRODUCTION: FLS have been promoted as the most effective interventions for secondary fracture prevention, and while there is evidence of increased rate of investigation and treatment at institutions with a FLS, only a few studies have considered fracture outcomes directly. We therefore sought to evaluate the ability of our FLS to reduce re-fracture risk. METHODS: Historical cohort study of all patients ≥50 years presenting over a 6-month period with a minimal trauma fracture (MTF) to the emergency departments of a tertiary hospital with a FLS, and one without a FLS. Baseline characteristics, mortality and MTFs over a 3-year follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: Five hundred fifteen patients at the FLS hospital and 416 patients at the non-FLS hospital were studied. Over 3 years, 63/515 (12%) patients at the FLS hospital and 70/416 (17%) at the non-FLS hospital had a MTF. All patients were analysed in an intention-to-treat analysis regardless of whether they were seen in the FLS follow-up clinic. Statistical analysis using Cox proportional hazard models in the presence of a competing risk of death from any cause was used. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, there was a ∼30% reduction in rate of any re-fracture at the FLS hospital (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.95, p value 0.025) and a ∼40% reduction in major re-fractures (hip, spine, femur, pelvis or humerus) (HR 0.59, CI 0.39-0.90, p value 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: We found a ∼30% reduction in any re-fractures and a ∼40% reduction in major re-fractures at the FLS hospital compared with a similar non-FLS hospital. The number of patients needed to treat to prevent one new fracture over 3 years is 20.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Secondary Prevention/organization & administration
3.
J Bone Joint Surg Br ; 90(10): 1261-70, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18827232

ABSTRACT

The pathophysiology of intervertebral disc degeneration has been extensively studied. Various factors have been suggested as influencing its aetiology, including mechanical factors, such as compressive loading, shear stress and vibration, as well as ageing, genetic, systemic and toxic factors, which can lead to degeneration of the disc through biochemical reactions. How are these factors linked? What is their individual importance? There is no clear evidence indicating whether ageing in the presence of repetitive injury or repetitive injury in the absence of ageing plays a greater role in the degenerative process. Mechanical factors can trigger biochemical reactions which, in turn, may promote the normal biological changes of ageing, which can also be accelerated by genetic factors. Degradation of the molecular structure of the disc during ageing renders it more susceptible to superimposed mechanical injuries. This review supports the theory that degeneration of the disc has a complex multifactorial aetiology. Which factors initiate the events in the degenerative cascade is a question that remains unanswered, but most evidence points to an age-related process influenced primarily by mechanical and genetic factors.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/etiology , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/etiology , Intervertebral Disc/physiopathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Mechanotransduction, Cellular/physiology , Occupational Diseases/complications , Age Factors , Aging/physiology , Back Pain/genetics , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Intervertebral Disc/metabolism , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/genetics , Mechanotransduction, Cellular/genetics , Rotation , Stress, Mechanical , Weight-Bearing/physiology
4.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H ; 222(2): 151-9, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18441751

ABSTRACT

Various actions on the lumbar spine have been attributed to quadratus lumborum, but they have not been substantiated by quantitative data. The present study was undertaken to determine the magnitude of forces and moments that quadratus lumborum could exert on the lumbar spine. The fascicular anatomy of quadratus lumborum was studied in six embalmed cadavers. For each fascicle, the sites of attachment, orientation, and physiological cross-sectional area were determined. The fascicular anatomy varied considerably, between sides and between specimens, with respect to the number of fascicles, their prevalence, and their sizes. Approximately half of the fascicles act on the twelfth rib, and the rest act on the lumbar spine. The more consistently present fascicles were incorporated, as force-equivalents, into a model of quadratus lumborum in order to determine its possible actions. The magnitudes of the compression forces exerted by quadratus lumborum on the lumbar spine, the extensor moment, and the lateral bending moment, were each no greater than 10 per cent of those exerted by erector spinae and multifidus. These data indicate that quadratus lumborum has no more than a modest action on the lumbar spine, in quantitative terms. Its actual role in spinal biomechanics has still to be determined.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/anatomy & histology , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/anatomy & histology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Tendons/anatomy & histology , Tendons/physiology , Cadaver , Humans , Ilium/anatomy & histology , Ilium/physiology , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Ribs/anatomy & histology , Ribs/physiology , Stress, Mechanical
5.
Eur Spine J ; 16(10): 1539-50, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17566796

ABSTRACT

Clinical practice guidelines state that the tissue source of low back pain cannot be specified in the majority of patients. However, there has been no systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests used to identify the source of low back pain. The aim of this systematic review was therefore to determine the diagnostic accuracy of tests available to clinicians to identify the disc, facet joint or sacroiliac joint (SIJ) as the source of low back pain. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched up to February 2006 with citation tracking of eligible studies. Eligible studies compared index tests with an appropriate reference test (discography, facet joint or SIJ blocks or medial branch blocks) in patients with low back pain. Positive likelihood ratios (+LR) > 2 or negative likelihood ratios (-LR) < 0.5 were considered informative. Forty-one studies of moderate quality were included; 28 investigated the disc, 8 the facet joint and 7 the SIJ. Various features observed on MRI (high intensity zone, endplate changes and disc degeneration) produced informative +LR (> 2) in the majority of studies increasing the probability of the disc being the low back pain source. However, heterogeneity of the data prevented pooling. +LR ranged from 1.5 to 5.9, 1.6 to 4.0, and 0.6 to 5.9 for high intensity zone, disc degeneration and endplate changes, respectively. Centralisation was the only clinical feature found to increase the likelihood of the disc as the source of pain: +LR = 2.8 (95%CI 1.4-5.3). Absence of degeneration on MRI was the only test found to reduce the likelihood of the disc as the source of pain: -LR = 0.21 (95%CI 0.12-0.35). While single manual tests of the SIJ were uninformative, their use in combination was informative with +LR of 3.2 (95%CI 2.3-4.4) and -LR of 0.29 (95%CI 0.12-0.35). None of the tests for facet joint pain were found to be informative. The results of this review demonstrate that tests do exist that change the probability of the disc or SIJ (but not the facet joint) as the source of low back pain. However, the changes in probability are usually small and at best moderate. The usefulness of these tests in clinical practice, particularly for guiding treatment selection, remains unclear.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Intervertebral Disc/pathology , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Sacroiliac Joint/pathology , Zygapophyseal Joint/pathology , Humans , Low Back Pain/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vibration
6.
Cephalalgia ; 24(10): 819-20, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15377311
7.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 74(1): 88-93, 2003 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12486273

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a revised technique of percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy for third occipital headache. METHODS: The revisions included using a large gauge electrode, ensuring minimum separation between the three electrode placements, and holding the electrode in place by hand. The revised technique was used to treat 51 nerves in 49 patients diagnosed as suffering from third occipital headache on the basis of controlled diagnostic blocks of the third occipital nerve. The criteria for successful outcome were complete relief of pain for at least 90 days associated with restoration of normal activities of daily living, and no use of drug treatment for the headache. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients, 43 (88%) achieved a successful outcome. The median duration of relief in these patients was 297 days, with eight patients continuing to have ongoing relief. Fourteen patients underwent a repeat neurotomy to reinstate relief, with 12 (86%) achieving a successful outcome. The median duration of relief in these patients was 217 days, with six patients having ongoing relief. Side effects of the procedure were consistent with coagulation of the third occipital nerve and consisted of slight ataxia, numbness, and temporary dysaesthesia. No side effects required intervention, and they were tolerated by the patients in exchange for the relief of headache. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the revised procedure greatly improved the rather low success rate previously encountered with third occipital neurotomy. Although the relief of headache is limited in duration, it is profound and can be reinstated by repeat neurotomy. No other form of treatment has been validated for this common form of headache.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation/methods , Electrocoagulation/methods , Head/innervation , Headache Disorders/surgery , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/surgery , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Catheter Ablation/instrumentation , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/innervation , Electrocoagulation/instrumentation , Electrodes , Female , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neck/diagnostic imaging , Neck/innervation , Pain Clinics , Radiography , Treatment Outcome
8.
Cephalalgia ; 22(1): 15-22, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11993608

ABSTRACT

Studies in normal volunteers have demonstrated that the lateral atlanto-axial joints (C1-2) are capable of causing pain in the occiput, but few clinical studies have validated this source of occipital headache. The present study tested the null hypothesis that the lateral atlanto-axial joints are not a common source of occipital headache. Patients presenting with occipital pain underwent diagnostic blocks of their lateral atlanto-axial joints if they demonstrated clinical features presumptively suggestive of a C1-2 origin for their pain. Of 34 patients investigated, 21 obtained complete relief of their headache following diagnostic blocks, indicating that a C1-2 source of occipital pain is not rare. The clinical features used to select patients for blocks, however, had a positive predictive value of only 60%. Further study of headaches from C1-2 seems justified in order to establish more definitively the prevalence of this condition and how it might become better recognized in practice.


Subject(s)
Atlanto-Axial Joint/innervation , Betamethasone , Bupivacaine , Headache Disorders/diagnosis , Nerve Block , Adult , Aged , Arthrography , Cervical Vertebrae/innervation , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Headache Disorders/physiopathology , Headache Disorders/therapy , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Male , Middle Aged , Occipital Bone/innervation , Pain Measurement/methods , Spinal Nerves/drug effects , Spinal Nerves/physiopathology
9.
Pain Pract ; 2(3): 180-2, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17147724
10.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 26(23): 2615-22, 2001 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11725244

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study involving parallel benchmarking audits was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based medical care and usual care for acute low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although several sets of guidelines have been promoted for the management of acute low back pain, there is no evidence that following guidelines results in better outcomes. METHODS: Special clinics were established, at which trained medical practitioners managed patients with acute low back pain according to evidence-based guidelines. Their outcomes were audited by independent research nurses. Meanwhile, and separately, the outcomes of patients managed by their own general practitioners were audited by research nurses using the same instruments of assessment. RESULTS: In both settings, patients showed remarkable degrees and rates of recovery, with low rates of recurrence. However, evidence-based medical care resulted in a significantly lower cost of treatment; a significantly greater reduction in pain, sustained at both 6 and 12 months; significantly fewer patients requiring continuing care at 3, 6, and 12 months; a significantly greater proportion of patients fully recovered at 12 months; and significantly greater proportions of patients rating their treatment as extremely helpful and offering positive, unsolicited comments about their treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The immediate results from evidence-based care are marginally better than those from good usual care, but in the long term, evidence-based care achieves clinically and statistically significant gains, with fewer patients requiring continuing care and remaining in pain. Consumers approve of evidence-based care.


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine/economics , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Health Care Costs , Low Back Pain/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care , Adult , Aged , Benchmarking , Case-Control Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Safety , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL