Resource Utilization in Children who Receive a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Consult in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics, critical care resource requirements, and outcomes of children who were hospitalized after a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) consult in the Emergency Department (ED). METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, we conducted chart reviews for children (<18 years) hospitalized following a PICU consult in the ED to examine patient characteristics, timing of consult, ED length of stay, Medical Emergency Team (MET) utilization, PICU nursing workload, and critical care interventions for children who were and were not admitted to the PICU. RESULTS: During the one-year study period, 247 PICU consults were performed in the ED resulting in 161 (65.2%) direct admissions to PICU and 1 indirect PICU admission via the ward. Of 105 children with complex chronic conditions, 73 (69.5%) were admitted to PICU, including 32 (91.4%) of 35 children with chronic home ventilatory needs, only 2 (6.2%) of whom received a critical care intervention beyond respiratory support. Within 24 h of hospitalization, 112 (69.1%) of 162 PICU admissions received a critical care-specific intervention. Of 86 (34.8%) ward admissions, 16 (18.6%) were reviewed by the MET. Children admitted to the ward had a significantly longer post-consult ED length of stay than children admitted to PICU (median 428 min vs. 130 min; p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Over two-thirds of children admitted to PICU from the ED required early critical care interventions, with the remainder potentially benefitting from closer monitoring or a higher frequency of non-critical care interventions than can be reasonably provided on general inpatient wards. More research is needed to evaluate critical care and hospital resource utilization when children are triaged to the ward following a PICU consult in the ED.

Neonatal Ethics Teaching Program - Scenario-Oriented Learning in Ethics: Announcing the Diagnosis of Trisomy 21.

INTRODUCTION: Delivering unexpected news to families can lead to emotionally charged conversations that cause discomfort and feelings of ineffectiveness in pediatric postgraduate trainees. Although prenatal screening exists, over 80% of trisomy 21 diagnoses continue to be made postnatally to unsuspecting parents who report a desire for better communication from health care professionals when they first receive the news of their child's diagnosis. Recognizing this area for improvement as reported in the literature, as well as the expressed desire from fellows in the University of Ottawa neonatal-perinatal medicine program for additional protected time to preemptively practice such disclosures, this trisomy 21 Scenario-Oriented Learning in Ethics workshop was developed. METHODS: During the workshop, trainees are introduced to an evidence-based communication framework that provides them with strategies to facilitate clear knowledge translation and promote rapport with families for this specific clinical scenario. Participants are divided into small groups and practice disclosing a trisomy 21 diagnosis to a standardized patient in the role of a new mother. Each small group is supported by two trained facilitators who are experts in delivering life-altering news. RESULTS: The pilot workshop was completed by 21 postgraduate trainees from the University of Ottawa. Qualitative evaluations were overwhelmingly positive, with feedback indicating high levels of perceived usefulness for the workshop. DISCUSSION: By preemptively practicing evidence-based communication, we hope to increase trainee confidence and preparation for trisomy 21 disclosures and improve parents' feelings regarding the quality of communication and support provided while receiving real-life trisomy 21 diagnoses.