The Most Influential Publications Regarding Hair Transplantation: A Bibliometric Review.

INTRODUCTION: This bibliometric review aims to assess the impact of significant publications within the field of hair transplantation. Citation counts will serve as a primary influence indicator. METHODS: An exhaustive search was conducted using Clarivate's Web of Science database, yielding 260 publications related to hair transplantation. These were evaluated and sorted based on citations, narrowing down to the 50 most highly cited works for analysis. Parameters including citation density, authorship, institutional affiliations, country of origin, year of publication, article topic, and the level of evidence for each publication were obtained. RESULTS: Analyzed publications were cited a total of 1341 times. Authorship analysis revealed that the most significant contributors regarding hair transplantation were Bernstein and Rassman. We also identified the leading institutions affiliated with these works, highlighting the primary academic and research centers driving the field. Geographical analysis exhibited the US' dominance in producing impactful publications. Most publications were also classified within Level IV and Level V according to the Oxford Levels of Evidence system. CONCLUSION: This review provides a comprehensive snapshot of the pivotal publications shaping hair transplantation. Our findings underscore significant contributions within this field and may assist researchers and clinicians in understanding the evolution and the current state of the hair transplantation literature. This bibliometric analysis can serve as a roadmap for those seeking to delve into this rapidly evolving field, facilitating the identification of research gaps and formulating future research directions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Top 100 Most-Cited Publications in Clinical Craniofacial Research.

INTRODUCTION: Craniosynostosis is a birth defect defined as premature closure of sutures leading to possible neurological deficits and cosmetic deformities. Most of the current literature to date focuses on craniosynostosis etiology by analyzing genetics. This paper is a bibliometric analysis of the most influential works related to the clinical management of craniosynostosis to help guide clinicians in their decision-making. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clarivate Web of Science database was used to identify the top 100 most-cited articles addressing the clinical management of craniosynostosis. A bibliometric review was performed to analyze publication metrics and track research trends. RESULTS: The 100 most-cited publications pertaining to craniosynostosis management were cited a cumulative 12,779 times. The highest cited article was Shillito and colleagues' "Craniosynostosis: A Review Of 519 Surgical Patients" with 352 citations. The oldest clinical craniosynostosis article dates back to 1948, and the most recent was published in 2016. The year with the most clinical-focused publications was 2011. The most prolific author was Renier, D. The United States produced 56 of the 100 articles. Most articles (n=52) were level 3 evidence. DISCUSSION: This bibliometric evaluation of craniosynostosis provides insight into the most impactful literature on this topic. The highest cited articles retrospectively analyze large sample sizes, outline proper evaluation, discuss intervention timelines, and highlight specific treatment plans for this birth defect. By filtering through existing literature, this analysis can guide clinicians on the management of craniosynostosis to maximize patient outcomes.

Epidemiology of Pediatric Ocular Surface Inflammatory Diseases in the United States Using the Optum Labs Data Warehouse.

PURPOSE: To benchmark the epidemiologic features of pediatric ocular surface inflammatory diseases (POSID). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 18 years of age or younger with a medical claim for a diagnosis of POSID in the Optum Labs Data Warehouse between 2007 and 2020. METHODS: Patients with claims of blepharokeratoconjunctivitis (BKC), herpes simplex keratoconjunctivitis (HSK), or vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) were included. Those with less than 6 months of follow-up before the initial diagnosis of POSID were excluded. Odds ratios (ORs) were derived from multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluating the associations between epidemiologic variables and POSID development. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the estimated prevalence of POSID. Prevalence of POSID subtypes and changes in prevalence over time were also evaluated. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred sixty-eight patients with POSID were identified from 2018 through 2019, yielding an estimated prevalence of 3.32 per 10 000. The prevalence of POSID was higher among children between 5 and 10 years of age, male children, those of Asian descent, and those living in the Northeast and the West census regions of the United States. The prevalence (per 10 000) of BKC, HSK, and VKC in the same period were 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.65), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.81), and 1.99 (95% CI, 1.88-2.10), respectively, and significant differences were found in terms of age, sex, racial, ethnic, and regional distributions among the diagnoses. Between 2008 through 2009 and 2018 through 2019, a significant increase in POSID was noted among Asians (from 6.26 [95% CI, 5.28-7.36] to 11.80 [95% CI, 10.40-13.34]) driven by changes in VKC. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that age older than 5 years (OR, 2.57-3.75; 95% CI, 2.17-4.34), male sex (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.26-1.50), Asian descent (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 2.70-3.60), and Black or African American descent (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.55) were associated with POSID development. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an estimated prevalence of POSID and its 3 common subtypes in the United States, with important epidemiologic differences among them. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.