Integrating Precision Medicine into Medical Dermatology Clinical Practice: An Expert Consensus Panel.

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine utilizes an individual’s genomics to improve diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. The joint American Academy of Dermatology and National Psoriasis Foundation 2019 guidelines recognized the need to identify biomarkers that can predict the optimal biologic agent for an individual patient. This paper examines the current state of precision medicine in dermatology and how its use can improve outcomes in psoriasis. METHODS: A search of PubMed/MEDLINE using the terms precision medicine, personalized medicine, biomarkers, genomics, and dermatology was performed to identify relevant publications. An expert consensus panel was then convened to assign levels of evidence to each article using strength of recommendation taxonomy and create consensus statements requiring a two-thirds supermajority for agreement utilizing a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS: Thirteen articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria and were assigned levels of evidence. The panel created 10 consensus statements on how precision medicine can improve patient outcomes, all of which received a unanimous (6/6) vote. CONCLUSION: Choosing a biologic medication for psoriasis often relies on patient preference, provider preference, and a trial-and-error approach. Utilizing precision medicine tests such as Mind.Px can help providers identify biomarkers unique to a patient’s pathophysiology and choose the optimal medication through a targeted and evidence-based approach. Zakria D, Brownstone N, Armstrong AW, et al. Integrating precision medicine into medical dermatology clinical practice: an expert consensus panel. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(6):588-593. doi:10.36849/JDD.7432.

Effect of Costimulatory Blockade With Abatacept After Ustekinumab Withdrawal in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: The PAUSE Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Psoriasis relapse may involve compensatory T-cell activation pathways in the presence of CD28-CD80/CD86 blockade with abatacept. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether costimulatory signaling blockade with abatacept prevents psoriasis relapse after ustekinumab withdrawal. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Psoriasis Treatment with Abatacept and Ustekinumab: a Study of Efficacy (PAUSE), a parallel-design, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, was conducted at 10 sites in the US and Canada. Participant enrollment opened on March 19, 2014, and concluded on April 11, 2016. Participants were adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and received ustekinumab in a lead-in phase. Those who responded to ustekinumab at week 12 were randomized 1:1 to either the continued with ustekinumab group (ustekinumab group) or the switched to abatacept group (abatacept group). Treatment was discontinued at week 39, and participants were followed up for psoriasis relapse until week 88. Statistical analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and safety samples from May 3, 2018, to July 6, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received subcutaneous ustekinumab at weeks 0 and 4 (45 mg per dose for those ≤100 kg; 90 mg per dose for those >100 kg). Participants randomized to the abatacept group at week 12 received subcutaneous abatacept, 125 mg weekly, from weeks 12 to 39 and ustekinumab placebo at weeks 16 and 28. Participants randomized to the ustekinumab group received ustekinumab at weeks 16 and 28 and abatacept placebo weekly from weeks 12 to 39. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the proportion of participants with psoriasis relapse (loss of ≥50% of the initial Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement) between weeks 12 and 88. Secondary end points included time to psoriasis relapse, proportion of participants with psoriasis relapse between weeks 12 and 40, and adverse events. The psoriasis transcriptome and serum cytokines were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 108 participants (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [12.1] years; 73 [67.6%] men) were treated with open-label ustekinumab; 91 were randomized to blinded treatment. Similar proportions of participants in the abatacept group and the ustekinumab group relapsed between weeks 12 and 88 (41 of 45 [91.1%] vs 40 of 46 [87.0%]; P = .41). Median time to relapse from the last dose of ustekinumab was similar between groups as well: 36 weeks (95% CI, 36-48 weeks) in the abatacept group vs 32 weeks (95% CI, 28-40 weeks) in the ustekinumab group. Similar numbers and rates of adverse events occurred. Abatacept did not maintain suppression of the pathogenic IL-23-mediated psoriasis molecular signature in lesions after ustekinumab withdrawal, and serum IL-19 levels increased. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This parallel-design, double-blind randomized clinical trial found that abatacept did not prevent psoriasis relapse that occurred after ustekinumab withdrawal because it did not completely block the pathogenic psoriasis molecular pathways that led to relapse. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01999868.

From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: Treatment targets for plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: An urgent need exists in the United States to establish treatment goals in psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: We aim to establish defined treatment targets toward which clinicians and patients with psoriasis can strive to inform treatment decisions, reduce disease burden, and improve outcomes in practice. METHODS: The National Psoriasis Foundation conducted a consensus-building study among psoriasis experts using the Delphi method. The process consisted of: (1) literature review, (2) pre-Delphi question selection and input from general dermatologists and patients, and (3) 4 Delphi rounds. RESULTS: A total of 25 psoriasis experts participated in the Delphi process. The most preferred instrument was body surface area (BSA). The most preferred time for evaluating patient response after starting new therapies was at 3 months. The acceptable response at 3 months postinitiation was either BSA 3% or less or BSA improvement 75% or more from baseline. The target response at 3 months postinitiation was BSA 1% or less. During the maintenance period, evaluation every 6 months was most preferred. The target response at every 6 months maintenance evaluation is BSA 1% or less. LIMITATIONS: Although BSA is feasible in practice, it does not encompass health-related quality of life, costs, and risks of side effects. CONCLUSION: With defined treatment targets, clinicians and patients can regularly evaluate treatment responses and perform benefit-risk assessments of therapeutic options individualized to the patient.

Treatment of refractory necrobiotic xanthogranulomas with extracorporeal photopheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Necrobiotic xanthogranuloma (NXG) is a disease of fibrotic or telangiectatic granulomatous papules and nodules that can ultimately progress into ulcerated plaques. Although the exact cause of NXG is unknown, it most often occurs in patients with paraproteinemia secondary to a hematologic disease. Consequently, therapy for NXG is targeted at treating the underlying hematologic disease, and subsequent paraproteinemia, with alkylating agents, antimetabolites, radiation, and/or immunosuppressive agents. Cases refractory to these therapies often have poor outcomes. We report the successful treatment of two patients with refractory NXG with two different modalities: extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). The first case shows a patient without paraproteinemia who had success with ECP and IVIG, and the second is a patient with paraproteinemia treated effectively with IVIG. The beneficial response of our patients to IVIG, as well as ECP, shows that they may be an effective treatment option for refractory NXG.

Therapeutic hotline. Abatacept: our experience of use in two patients with refractory psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

The B7 family of molecules on antigen presenting cells (APCs) regulate T cell activation. They deliver stimulatory signals through CD28 and inhibitory signals through CD152, or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4). CTLA4Ig (abatacept) is a soluble chimeric protein consisting of the extracellular domain of human CD152 linked to the modified Fc portion of human IgG1. By binding to B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) molecules on APCs, CTLA4Ig blocks the CD28-mediated costimulatory signal for T cell activation. Success with abatacept has been noted in psoriasis. Abatacept was administered to two patients with refractory psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis after the patients had failed all conventional treatment methods. Both patients experienced very brief improvement in disease. The improvement, however, was not continued, and both patients were taken off the medication. The small patient population limits the extrapolation of the present authors' results to the larger population. Furthermore, the present authors' patients have very severe, refractory disease and do not adequately represent the majority of psoriasis patients. Although the present authors' patients demonstrated brief response to drug, this response was not sustained. No adverse events were reported in the present authors' patients.

Reductions in healthcare resource utilization in psoriatic arthritis patients receiving etanercept therapy: results from the educate trial.

The Experience Diagnosing, Understanding Care, and Treatment with Enbrel (EDUCATE) trial is a phase IV, 24-week, multicenter, open-label study of etanercept 50 mg weekly in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in community dermatology clinics. In this study, patients with active PsA and moderate to severe plaque psoriasis have measurable uses of healthcare resources at baseline, reflecting a burden of illness. Etanercept significantly reduced healthcare resource utilization, absenteeism, and caregiver assistance in PsA patients after 24 weeks of treatment. These results could translate into savings on both direct and indirect costs and improvements in health-related quality of life for patients with PsA.

Use of etanercept for psoriatic arthritis in the dermatology clinic: the Experience Diagnosing, Understanding Care, and Treatment with Etanercept (EDUCATE) study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of etanercept to treat psoriatic arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,122 patients who had active psoriatic arthritis were enrolled in a Phase 4, non-randomized, open-label, single-arm, 24-week study. These patients had clinically stable, plaque psoriasis involving >or=10% body surface area and joint disease (either >or=two swollen and >or=two tender/painful joints for >or=3 months, or >or=one joint with sacroiliitis or spondylitis). They received etanercept therapy 50 mg subcutaneously once weekly for 24 weeks. RESULTS: After 24 weeks of treatment, 865 patients (77.1%; 95% CI: 74.64-79.55%) achieved a 'mild or better' score on the physician global assessment of psoriasis and were improved from baseline. Mean improvement in body surface area involvement was 16.9 percentage points (15.89-17.91). Patient global assessment of psoriasis, joint pain, and joint disease scores were improved by means of 2.2 (2.15-2.34), 2.7 (2.53-2.84), and 1.5 (1.39-1.55), respectively. Thirty-five patients (3.1%) experienced at least one serious adverse event. No patient died during the study. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the effectiveness and tolerability of etanercept treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis being treated at dermatology clinics.

Neonatal lupus erythematosus.

Neonatal lupus Erythematosus (NLE) is a disorder characterized by maternal autoantibodies against RNA protein complex, Ro/SSA or SSB/La. These maternal IgG antibodies cross the placenta and potentially lead to fetal tissue damage and the clinical manifestations NLE. NLE is uncommon, affects females more than males, has no race predilection, and involves multiple organs. It has cutaneous manifestations similar to subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). In addition to skin findings, patients with NLE have a significant risk of congenital heart block (CHB), a potentially fatal complication. Less frequently, hematologic and hepatic abnormalities occur. Approximately half of the reported cases have skin disease and half have CHB. Approximately 10% have both CHB and skin findings. The cutaneous, hematologic, and hepatic abnormalities are transient, clearing by 6 months of age. However, CHB is permanent and requires a pacemaker in many cases. The disorder results from the passive transfer of maternal autoantibodies, anti-RoSSA and anti-La/SSB. Sontheimer and McCauliffe reviewed the pathogenic role of anti-Ro antibody in NLE lesions and summarize evidence supporting its pathogenic role. Additional evidence suggests the possibility that Ro-antigen-specific T-cells may be present in SCLE patients and have the capacity to cause direct injury to the skin. McCuistion and Schoch first suggested this hypothesis in 1954 when they described an infant with LE skin findings born to a mother with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Since this initial observation, a number of researchers have documented the role of maternal autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of this disorder. The true incidence of NLE is not known; however, it is known that NLE accounts for approximately 80% of all cases of CHB, and the incidence of CHB is 1 per 20,000 live births. Therefore, it can be assumed that the incidence of NLE is at least 1 per 12,500 live births.

Cutaneous manifestations of gastrointestinal diseases.

Prompt recognition of cutaneous diseases or manifestations associated with the gastrointestinal tract may be lifesaving at times, and may lead to early preventive intervention to decrease risk of malignancy.