Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls.

OBJECTIVE: Cepstrum-based voice measures, such as smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS), are influenced by voice sound pressure level (SPL) in vocally healthy adults. Since it is unclear if similar effects hold in voice disordered adults and how these interact with natural fundamental frequency (fo) changes, this study examines voice SPL and fo effects on CPPS in women with vocal hyperfunction and vocally healthy controls. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective matched case-control study. METHODS: Fifty-eight women with vocal hyperfunction were individually matched with 58 vocally healthy women for occupation and approximate age. The patient group comprised women exhibiting phonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction associated with vocal fold nodules (n = 39) or polyps (n = 5), and nonphonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction associated with primary muscle tension dysphonia (n = 14). All participants sustained the vowel /a/ at soft, comfortable, and loud loudness conditions. Voice SPL, fo, and CPPS (dB) were computed from acoustic voice recordings using Praat. The effects of loudness condition, measured voice SPL, and fo on CPPS were assessed with linear mixed models. Pairwise correlations among voice SPL, fo, and CPPS were assessed using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Increasing voice SPL correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with higher CPPS in both patient (r2 = 0.53) and normative groups (r2 = 0.45). fo had statistically significant effects on CPPS (P < 0.001), but with a weak relation for the patient (r2 = 0.02) and control groups (r2 = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In women with and without voice disorder, CPPS is highly affected by the individual's voice SPL in vowel phonation. Future studies could investigate how these effects should be controlled for to improve the diagnostic value of acoustic-based cepstral measures.

Do Standard Instrumental Acoustic, Perceptual, and Subjective Voice Outcomes Indicate Therapy Success in Patients With Functional Dysphonia?

OBJECTIVES: The validity and sensitivity to change of instrumental acoustic measurements in patients with functional dysphonia have been controversially discussed. This work examines combined voice therapy effects on standard acoustic measurements, and if these agree with perceptual and subjective voice outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients (26 women, 13 men) aged 20-70 years (mean: 46.3, standard deviation 12.8) with functional dysphonia were investigated before and after combined voice therapy. Instrumental parameters included mean and range of speaking fundamental frequency (fo) and intensity (SPL (dBA)); maximum SPL and mean fo of calling voice; minimum, maximum, range of singing voice fo and SPL, jitter (%), and the Dysphonia Severity Index. Voice Handicap Index-9 international was used for subjective and Grading-Roughness-Breathiness-Asthenia-Strain scale for perceptual assessment. Differences were investigated by Wilcoxon signed ranks test and coherences by Spearman rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: After treatment, the speaking voice fo range (7-8.13 semitones) and SPL range (12.9-14.85 dB(A)) were significantly larger (P < 0.05). Both parameters were highly correlated (P < 0.001). Subjective symptoms were significantly reduced from a mean Voice Handicap Index-9 international of 15.6-8.6, and all perceptual Grading-Roughness-Breathiness-Asthenia-Strain scale parameters were significantly improved (G: 1.05-0.51) after therapy (P < 0.05). These findings were not associated with any acoustic parameter (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly improved subjective and perceptual findings verify positive combined voice therapy effects in patients with functional dysphonia. The larger fo and SPL speaking voice range after treatment indicate an altered voice technique. These instrumental measures may be clinical indicators of therapy success and transfer effects.