Level of agreement between cardiac output measurements using Nexfin® and thermodilution in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

Morbidly obese patients are at increased risk of intra-operative haemodynamic instability, which may necessitate intensive monitoring. Non-invasive monitoring is increasingly used to measure cardiac output; however, it is unknown whether the weight-based algorithm utilised in these devices is applicable to patients with morbid obesity. We compared the level of agreement and trending ability of non-invasive cardiac output measurements (Nexfin® ) with the gold-standard thermodilution technique in 30 morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean (SD) bias of 0.60 (1.62) l.min-1 (limits of agreement -2.67 to 3.86 l.min-1 ) and the precision error was 46%. Polar plot analysis resulted in an angular bias of 2.61°, radial limits of agreement of -60.08° to 49.82° and angular concordance rate was 77%. Both agreement and trending were outside the Critchley criteria for the comparison of cardiac output devices with a gold-standard. Nexfin has an unacceptable level of agreement compared with thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in morbidly obese patients.

Minimally invasive intraoperative estimation of left-ventricular end-systolic elastance with phenylephrine as loading intervention.

BACKGROUND: Left-ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) is an index of cardiac contractility, but the invasive nature of its assessment has limited perioperative application. We explored the feasibility of a minimally invasive method of Ees estimation for perioperative assessment of cardiac function and evaluated the suitability of phenylephrine as a loading intervention. METHODS: In 17 surgical patients, Ees was determined as the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation, which was obtained from non-invasive or invasive continuous arterial pressure measurements and left-ventricular volume determinations using transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE). Ees was determined using as loading interventions preload reduction by inferior vena cava compression (IVCC) and afterload increase by phenylephrine administration. RESULTS: Median invasive Ees determined with phenylephrine estimated 1.05 (0.59-1.21) mm Hg ml(-1) and with IVCC 0.58 (0.31-1.13) mm Hg ml(-1). Bland-Altman analysis to evaluate the level of agreement between minimally invasive and invasive Ees estimation revealed a bias of -0.03 (0.12) mm Hg ml(-1) with limits of agreement from -0.27 to 0.21 mm Hg ml(-1) and the percentage error was 33%. Agreement between Ees obtained with phenylephrine and IVCC revealed a bias of 0.15 (0.69) mm Hg ml(-1) with limits of agreement from -1.21 to 1.51 mm Hg ml(-1) and a percentage error of 149%. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to determine Ees combining continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurements and left-ventricular volume determinations with TOE. However, administration of phenylephrine cannot substitute IVCC as a loading intervention, indicating that estimation of Ees in the intraoperative setting remains a challenge.