ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Informed by Minority Stress Theory, to investigate disparities in pain intensity, interference, and care in patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) based on demographic features. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Outpatient SCI clinics in 2 academic medical centers in the northwestern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Sample of 242 SCI clinic patients who endorsed SCI-related pain, were ≥18-years-of-age, English-fluent, not diagnosed with bipolar or psychotic disorders, and able to make their own medical decisions. Participants were 74.8% men, an average of 48.5 years (range 18.1-89.8 years), 76.2% White, 31.9% privately insured, and 64.7% making <$50,000 per year. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Exploratory analyses of screening data from a randomized controlled trial for pain treatment. Primary outcomes included pain intensity, pain interference, and the patient report of recommended pain treatments by a medical provider, tried by the patient, or that the patient would be willing to try. RESULTS: More treatments recommended was associated with younger age (ρ=-0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.01 to -0.27, P=.03) and private insurance (ρ=-0.15, 95% CI: 0.02-0.27, P=.03), whereas more treatments tried was associated with private insurance alone (ρ=0.20, 95% CI: 0.07-0.32, P=.003). Number of treatments willing to be tried was associated with lower income (ρ=-0.15, 95% CI: -0.02 to -0.28, P=.03). SCI patients of color (PoC) reported higher pain intensity (Cohen's d=0.41, 95% CI: 0.11-0.71) and greater odds of receiving psychotherapy for pain (odds ratio: 7.12, 95% CI: 1.25-40.46) than their White peers. CONCLUSIONS: These exploratory findings indicate differences in SCI-related pain intensity based on identifying as PoC, and differences in SCI-related pain treatment modalities based on identifying as PoC, age, insurance type, and income. Further work exploring differences in SCI-related pain care based on patient social identities is warranted.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at 12-months post-moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Setting: Four inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals enrolled in the TBI Model Systems with moderate to severe TBI, admitted to inpatient rehabilitation, and able to ambulate without physical assistance from another person. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal cohort study. MVPA was measured by having participants wear an ActiGraph GT3X on their wrist for 7 consecutive days. MAIN ANALYSES: We used multivariate regression to predict minutes per week of MVPA at 12 months after TBI. Three classes of predictors were entered hierarchically-demographic and clinical variables (age, sex, body mass index, education, TBI severity, neighborhood walkability score, and self-reported preinjury physical activity [PA] level), baseline TBI-related comorbid conditions (eg, measures of sleep, pain, mood, fatigue, and cognition), and intention to exercise and exercise self-efficacy assessed approximately 1 week after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. RESULTS: 180 participants (ages 17.7-90.3 years) were enrolled, and 102 provided at least 5 days of valid accelerometer data at 12 months. At 12 months, participants recorded an average of 703 (587) minutes per week of MVPA. In univariate and multivariate analyses, age was the only significant predictor of 12-month MVPA (r = -0.52). A sharp decline in MVPA was observed in the tertile of participants who were over the age of 61. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with TBI are at elevated risk of being physically inactive. Assuming PA may enhance health after TBI, older adults are a logical target for prevention or early intervention studies. Studies with longer outcomes are needed to understand the trajectory of PA levels after TBI.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is prevalent, yet sub-optimally treated among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). We propose that exercise training may be a promising approach for treating depression in persons with MS who have MDD. Our primary hypothesis predicts a reduction in depression severity immediately after an exercise training intervention compared with minimal change in an attention control condition, and the reduction will be maintained during a follow-up period. METHODS: This study involves a parallel-group, assessor-blinded RCT that examines the effect of a 4-month home-based exercise training intervention on depression severity in a sample of persons with MS who have MDD based on the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview. The primary outcomes of depression severity are the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Participants (N = 146) will be recruited from within 200 miles of the University of Illinois at Chicago and randomized (1:1) into either a home-based exercise training condition or control condition with concealed allocation. The exercise training and social-contact, attention control (i.e., stretching) conditions will be delivered remotely over a 4-month period and supported through eight, 1:1 Zoom-based behavioral coaching sessions guided by social-cognitive theory and conducted by persons who are uninvolved in screening, recruitment, random assignment, and outcome assessment. We will collect outcome data at 0, 4 and 8 months using treatment-blinded assessors, and data analyses will involve intent-to-treat principles. DISCUSSION: If successful, the proposed study will provide the first Class I evidence supporting a home-based exercise training program for treating MDD in persons with MS. This is critical as exercise training would likely have positive secondary effects on symptoms, cognition, and quality of life, and provide a powerful, behavioral approach for managing the many negative outcomes of MDD in MS. The program in the proposed research is accessible and scalable for broad treatment of depression in MS, and provides the potential for integration in the clinical management of MS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on September 10, 2021 at clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT05051618. The registration occurred before we initiated recruitment on June 2, 2023.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Quality of Life , Exercise , Exercise Therapy , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: Examine demographics, injury characteristics, objective measures of social isolation and health factors that are associated with perceived social isolation (PSI) among Veterans with spinal cord injury and disorders (SCI/D). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: The Veterans Health Administrations (VHA) SCI/D system of care. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans with SCI/D who have used the VHA health care system. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. OUTCOMES MEASURES: We assessed unadjusted associations of high PSI (above population mean) vs low (normative/below population mean), and multivariable logistic regression for independent associations with PSI. RESULTS: Out of 1942 Veterans with SCI/D, 421 completed the survey (22% response rate). Over half (56%) had PSI mean scores higher than the general population. Among the objective measures, having a smaller social network size was associated with increased odds of high PSI (OR 3.59, P < .0001); additionally, for health factors, having depression (OR 3.98, P < 0.0001), anxiety (OR 2.29, P = 0.009), and post-traumatic stress (OR 2.56, P = 0.003) in the previous 6 months, and having 4 or more chronically occurring secondary conditions (OR 1.78, P = 0.045) was associated with increased odds of high PSI. The most commonly identified contributors to feelings of PSI included mobility concerns (63%), having a SCI/D (61%), and concerns about being a burden on others (57%). CONCLUSIONS: Factors such as social network size may be used to identify individuals with SCI/D at risk for PSI. Additionally, by identifying mental health problems, presence of multiple chronically occurring secondary conditions, and Veteran-identified contributors of PSI, we can target these factors in a patient-centered interventions to identify and reduce PSI.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCI/D) are at increased risk for experiencing loneliness and social isolation. The aim is to describe facilitators identified by individuals living with SCI/D to alleviate loneliness and perceived social isolation. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Descriptive qualitative design using in-depth interviews with veterans with SCI/D (n = 23). Descriptive statistics was used to calculate demographic and injury characteristics. Audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim transcripts were coded and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) six thematic analysis phases. RESULTS: Participants were male (70%), white (78%), and not currently married (35%), with an average age of 66 years (42-88). Participants had paraplegia (61%), with traumatic etiology (65%) and were injured 14 years (1-45) on average. Eight themes were identified by participants living with SCI/D that described facilitators to alleviate loneliness and perceived social isolation. (a) Engage in/pursue interests; (b) Interact with/spend time with others; (c) Embrace acceptance; (d) Take part in reciprocity; (e) Find a purpose/accomplish goals; (f) Get out of residence, get outside; (g) Connect with SCI/D community/SCI/D peers; and (h) Seek help from (mental) healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Individuals with SCI/D identified facilitators to alleviate loneliness that encompasses changes in ways of thinking, actions to expand participation in life, and efforts focused on involving others. Findings can be used to guide healthcare delivery and develop interventions to target feelings of loneliness and social isolation in persons with SCI/D, which may be particularly impactful if they involve reciprocal interactions with peers with SCI/D. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Subject(s)
Loneliness , Qualitative Research , Social Isolation , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Loneliness/psychology , Spinal Cord Injuries/psychology , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Social Isolation/psychology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Veterans/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify variables independently associated with moderate to high loneliness in individuals living with Spinal Cord Injuries or Disorders (SCI/D). DESIGN: A cross-sectional, national survey of a random sample of community-dwelling Veterans with SCI/D in the United States. Survey methodology was used to collect data on demographic and injury characteristics, general health, chronic and SCI-secondary conditions, and loneliness. SETTING: The VHA SCI/D System of Care including 25 regional SCI/D Centers (or Hubs). PARTICIPANTS: Among 2466 Veterans with SCI/D, 592 completed surveys (24%). Most participants were men (91%), white (81%), not currently married (42%), had tetraplegia (33%), and on average injured for 18 years at the time of data collection (N=562). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The dependent variable, loneliness, was collected using the UCLA-3 instrument. Loneliness was dichotomized into never/low loneliness and moderate/high loneliness (UCLA score ≥ 4). RESULTS: Bivariate analyses assessed unadjusted associations in demographics, injury characteristics, chronic disease, and SCI-secondary conditions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with moderate/high loneliness. Participants had a mean loneliness score of 5.04, SD=1.99. The point prevalence of moderate to high loneliness was 66%. Lower duration of injury, paraplegia, being unmarried, being in fair/poor general health, having dysfunctional sleep, and having a diagnosis of bowel dysfunction were each independently associated with greater odds of moderate/high loneliness. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that interventions to reduce/manage loneliness in the Veteran SCI/D population should focus on those who are more newly injured, have paraplegia, currently unmarried, have bowel problems, and experience dysfunctional sleep.
Subject(s)
Loneliness , Spinal Cord Injuries , Veterans , Humans , Male , Loneliness/psychology , Female , Spinal Cord Injuries/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Veterans/psychology , Aged , Spinal Cord Diseases/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The development of depression after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) can be used to treat post-TBI depression, but the symptoms response is poorly described. OBJECTIVE: This secondary analysis assessed: (1) the trajectory of depression symptoms up to 12 sessions of CBT, (2) which depressive symptom clusters were responsive to in-person and phone CBT, and (3) whether interim depression thresholds predict 16-week treatment response. METHOD: This secondary analysis of the IRB-approved Life Improvement Following Traumatic Brain Injury trial included 100 adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) within ten years of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury from throughout the US. We used a combination of descriptive, graphical, and diagnostic accuracy methods. RESULTS: Cardinal and cognitive-affective symptom clusters improved most from CBT over 16 weeks. At 8 and 16 weeks, the most responsive individual symptoms were anhedonia, depressed mood, and fatigue; the least responsive were sleep and appetite. PHQ-9 thresholds with a Negative Predictive Value greater than 0.7 for sessions 6, 7, and 8 were, respectively: >15, >10, and >9. CONCLUSION: In-person and phone CBT led to similar symptom responses during treatment. Additionally, using PHQ-9 thresholds for predicting intervention response within eight sessions may help identify the need for treatment adjustments.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major , Adult , Humans , Depression/etiology , Depression/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: (1) Adapt evidence-based hypnosis-enhanced cognitive therapy (HYP-CT) for inpatient rehabilitation setting; and (2) determine feasibility of a clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of HYP-CT intervention for pain after spinal cord injury (SCI). STUDY DESIGN: Pilot non-randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: English-speaking patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation after SCI reporting current pain of at least 3 on a 0-10 scale. Persons with severe psychiatric illness, recent suicide attempt or elevated risk, or significant cognitive impairment were excluded. Consecutive sample of 53 patients with SCI-related pain enrolled, representing 82% of eligible patients. INTERVENTION: Up to 4 sessions of HYP-CT Intervention, each 30-60 minutes long. METHODS: Participants were assessed at baseline and given the choice to receive HYP-CT or Usual Care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant enrollment and participation and acceptability of intervention. Exploratory analyses examined the effect of intervention on pain and cognitive appraisals of pain. RESULTS: In the HYP-CT group, 71% completed at least 3 treatment sessions and reported treatment benefit and satisfaction with the treatment; no adverse events were reported. Exploratory analyses of effectiveness found pre-post treatment pain reductions after HYP-CT with large effect (P<.001; ß=-1.64). While the study was not powered to detect significant between-group differences at discharge, effect sizes revealed decreases in average pain (Cohen's d=-0.13), pain interference (d=-0.10), and pain catastrophizing (d=-0.20) in the HYP-CT group relative to control and increases in self-efficacy (d=0.27) and pain acceptance (d=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to provide HYP-CT to inpatients with SCI, and HYP-CT results in substantial reductions in SCI pain. The study is the first to show a psychological-based nonpharmacologic intervention that may reduce SCI pain during inpatient rehabilitation. A definitive efficacy trial is warranted.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Inpatients/psychology , Feasibility Studies , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Pain , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the cross-sectional and temporal relationships between minutes per week of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) as measured by a wrist-worn accelerometer and secondary conditions in the first year after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Four inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N = 180) with moderate-severe TBI enrolled in the TBI Model Systems Study. INTERVENTIONS: Participants wore a wrist accelerometer for 7 days immediately post discharge, and for 7 consecutive days at 6- and 12-months post injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Minutes per week of MVPA from daily averages based on wrist worn accelerometer. Secondary conditions included depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), fatigue (PROMIS Fatigue), Pain (Numeric Rating Scale), Sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), and cognition (Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone). RESULTS: At baseline, 6 and 12 months, 61%, 70% and 79% of the sample achieved at least 150 minutes per week of MVPA. The correlations between minutes of MVPA between baseline, 6 and 12 months were significant (r = 0.53-0.73), as were secondary conditions over these time points. However, no significant correlations were observed between minutes of MVPA and any secondary outcomes cross-sectionally or longitudinally at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Given the robust relationships physical activity has with outcomes in the general population, further research is needed to understand the effect of physical activity in individuals with moderate-severe TBI.
Subject(s)
Aftercare , Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Adult , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Prospective Studies , Patient Discharge , Exercise , FatigueABSTRACT
Our goal was to test the effectiveness of collaborative care (CC) versus usual care (UC) to improve treatment of pain, depression, physical inactivity, and quality of life in outpatients with spinal cord injury (SCI). We conducted a single blind parallel group randomized controlled trial. The setting was two outpatient SCI rehabilitation clinics within a large academic medical center. Participants were 174 outpatients who were on average 47.7 years old, 76% male, 76% white, 8% Hispanic, 47% tetraplegic, 95% more than 1 year post-SCI, and 45% on Medicare. The intervention consisted of a mental health-trained collaborative care manager (CM) integrated into two SCI rehabilitation medicine clinics and supervised by content experts in pain and mental health treatment. The CM provided assessment, medical care coordination, adherence support, outcome monitoring, and decision support along with brief psychological interventions to the patients via up to 12 in-person or telephone sessions. Among all participants, 61% chose to focus on pain; 31% on physical activity and 8% on depression. The primary outcome was quality of life as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF at the end of treatment (4 months). Secondary outcomes were quality of life at 8 months and pain intensity and interference, depression severity, and minutes per week of moderate to vigorous physical activity at 4 and 8 months. A total of 174 participants were randomized 1:1 to CC (n = 89) versus UC (n = 85). The primary analysis, a mixed-effects linear regression adjusting for time since injury and sex, revealed a non-significant trend for greater improvement in quality of life in CC versus UC at 4 months (p = 0.083). Secondary analyses showed that those receiving CC reported significantly greater improvement in pain interference at 4- and 8-months and in depression at 4-months, but no significant effect on physical activity. We conclude that in an outpatient SCI care setting, CC is a promising model for delivering integrated medical and psychological care and improving management of common, chronic, disabling conditions such and pain and depression.
Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Spinal Cord Injuries , United States , Humans , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Female , Outpatients , Depression/etiology , Depression/therapy , Single-Blind Method , Medicare , Exercise , Pain , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/psychologyABSTRACT
Early, acute pain following spinal cord injury (SCI) is common, can negatively impact SCI rehabilitation, and is frequently not responsive to biomedical treatment. Nonpharmacological interventions show promise in reducing pain for individuals with SCI. However, most psychological interventions rely heavily on verbal interaction between the individual being treated and the clinician, making them inaccessible for individuals with impaired verbal output due to mechanical ventilation. This case study aims to describe the adaptation and implementation of hypnotic cognitive therapy (HYP-CT) intervention for early SCI pain in the context of mechanical ventilation dependence and weaning. The participant was a 54-year-old male with C2 AIS A SCI requiring mechanical ventilation. Four sessions of HYP-CT were provided during inpatient rehabilitation with assessment prior to intervention, after the intervention sessions, and prior to discharge. The participant reported immediate reductions in pain intensity following each intervention session. Overall, he reported increases in self-efficacy and pain acceptance. He did not report any negative treatment effects and thought the intervention provided support during mechanical ventilation weaning. During treatment, he discontinued opioid pain medications and reported actively using intervention strategies. Our results support the potential for early, hypnotic cognitive therapy for individuals with SCI experiencing pain or distress while dependent on mechanical ventilation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Skills to manage the chronic effect of stroke are often not sufficiently addressed in early stroke rehabilitation. OBJECTIVES: The study evaluated the feasibility of conducting a trial testing the efficacy of telehealth self-management support early in stroke recovery. METHODOLOGY: Process, resources, and scientific feasibility was assessed for a randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of motivational interviewing and a group-based self-management program to treatment-as-usual with first-time stroke patients. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, effect sizes, and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen stroke patients were enrolled, and 10 completed the study (intervention n = 6). 100% attendance was achieved with technical support, reminders, and schedule flexibility. Participants were satisfied with the intervention and reported emotional benefits and gain of new insights. Perceived recovery showed moderate effect (r = 0.54). CONCLUSION: The findings support the feasibility of an efficacy trial as well as the potential benefit of integrating telehealth self-management support early in stroke rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Self-Management , Stroke Rehabilitation , Stroke , Telemedicine , Humans , Feasibility Studies , Stroke/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate associations between depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment among individuals with complicated mild to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) 1 year after injury. SETTING: Multiple inpatient rehabilitation units across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 498 adults 16 years and older who completed inpatient rehabilitation for complicated mild to severe TBI. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional observational cohort study. MAIN MEASURES: Assessments of depression (Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life [TBI-QOL] Depression) and anxiety (TBI-QOL Anxiety) as well as a telephone-based brief screening measure of cognitive functioning (Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone [BTACT]). RESULTS: We found an inverse relationship between self-reported depression symptoms and the BTACT Composite score (ß = -0.18, P < .01) and anxiety symptoms and the BTACT Composite score (ß = -0.20, P < .01). There was no evidence this relationship varied by injury severity. Exploratory analyses showed depression and anxiety were negatively correlated with both BTACT Executive Function factor score and BTACT Memory factor score. CONCLUSIONS: Both depression and anxiety have a small but significant negative association with cognitive performance in the context of complicated mild to severe TBI. These findings highlight the importance of considering depression and anxiety when interpreting TBI-related neuropsychological impairments, even among more severe TBI.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Quality of Life , Adult , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/psychology , Cognition , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/etiology , Neuropsychological TestsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on societal participation in people with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective cohort. SETTING: National TBI Model Systems centers, United States. PARTICIPANTS: TBI Model Systems enrollees (N=7003), ages 16 and older and 1-30 years postinjury, interviewed either prepandemic (PP) or during the pandemic (DP). The sample was primarily male (72.4%) and White (69.5%), with motor vehicle collisions as the most common cause of injury (55.1%). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The 3 subscales of the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective: Out and About (community involvement), Productivity, and Social Relations. RESULTS: Out and About, but not Productivity or Social Relations, scores were appreciably lower among DP participants compared to PP participants (medium effect). Demographic and clinical characteristics showed similar patterns of association with participation domains across PP and DP. When their unique contributions were examined in regression models, age, self-identified race, education level, employment status, marital status, income level, disability severity, and life satisfaction were variably predictive of participation domains, though most effects were small or medium in size. Depression and anxiety symptom severities each showed small zero-order correlations with participation domains across PP and DP but had negligible effects in regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the effect of COVID-19 on participation levels in the general population, people with TBI reported less community involvement during the pandemic, potentially compounding existing postinjury challenges to societal integration. The pandemic does not appear to have altered patterns of association between demographic/clinical characteristics and participation. Assessing and addressing barriers to community involvement should be a priority for TBI treatment providers. Longitudinal studies of TBI that consider pandemic-related effects on participation and other societally linked outcomes will help to elucidate the potential longer-term effect the pandemic has on behavioral health in this population.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , COVID-19 , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Examine considerations and perceived barriers to return to driving, and their association with psychosocial outcomes among adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who were not driving. METHODS: 174 adults with moderate-to-severe TBI enrolled in the TBI Model System participated in this cross-sectional study. All participants were drivers prior to their TBI. Outcome measures included the Barriers to Driving Questionnaire, Disability Rating Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7, and Satisfaction With Life Scale. Descriptive analyses examined considerations and barriers to driving, including differences associated with demographic characteristics. Moderation analyses investigated the extent to which disability moderated the relationship between barriers and psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: Social barriers were the most strongly endorsed domain, whereas physical barriers were endorsed least. The profile of endorsements differed for men and women, and for Black and White participants, on both theoretical considerations in returning to drive and experiences of barriers in doing so. Disability level moderated the relationship between barriers to driving and depression and life satisfaction, but not anxiety. CONCLUSION: The experience of barriers to driving is differentially associated with psychosocial outcomes among nondriving adults with TBI. Adults with low disability appear to be at risk for distress, even compared to other nondrivers.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Brain Injuries , Adult , Male , Humans , Female , Brain Injuries/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Anxiety/etiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence, severity, and correlates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) assessed before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data collected through the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) network at 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 years post TBI. SETTING: United States-based TBIMS rehabilitation centers with telephone assessment of community residing participants. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (72.4% male; mean age, 47.2 years) who enrolled in the TBIMS National Database and completed mental health questionnaires prepandemic (January 1, 2017 to February 29, 2020; n=5000) or during pandemic (April 1, 2022 to June 30, 2021; n=2009) (N=7009). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire. RESULTS: Separate linear and logistic regressions were constructed with demographic, psychosocial, injury-related, and functional characteristics, along with a binary indicator of COVID-19 pandemic period (prepandemic vs during pandemic), as predictors of mental health outcomes. No meaningful differences in depression, anxiety, or suicidal ideation were observed before vs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Correlations between predictors and mental health outcomes were similar before and during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our predictions, the prevalence, severity, and correlates of mental health conditions were similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results may reflect generalized resilience and are consistent with the most recent findings from the general population that indicate only small, transient increases in psychological distress associated with the pandemic. While unworsened, depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation remain prevalent and merit focused treatment and research efforts.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , COVID-19 , Suicide , Adult , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Female , Suicidal Ideation , Pandemics , Depression/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Independent Living , Rehabilitation Research , COVID-19/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/rehabilitation , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Perceived social isolation and loneliness are understudied in individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCI/D). The few existing studies reported that they are common, yet poorly treated, in persons with SCI/D. We developed an intervention called Caring Connections (CC) aimed at reducing loneliness and perceived social isolation in persons with SCI/D. CC is a peer-based, recurrent letter writing programme designed to provide moments of positivity. We will conduct and evaluate a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess changes in loneliness and social isolation outcomes between the CC intervention and control conditions in community-dwelling individuals with SCI/D. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RCT to compare outcomes of community-dwelling individuals with SCI/D undergoing the CC intervention to an attention control group (receiving informational materials on life domains important to a good quality of life). Eligible participants include adults with chronic SCI/D who have been injured for >1 year. The primary outcome is loneliness, measured using the UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) 3-item Loneliness Scale. Other outcomes include perceived social isolation and social support. A post-trial process evaluation will assess perceived benefits, negative impacts and satisfaction with the intervention, and areas for improvement. We will test the hypotheses of reduced loneliness and perceived social isolation in the CC intervention arm from baseline to 6 months and will also measure the magnitude of effect (difference between CC arm and attention control arm). We will use generalised linear models for repeated measures. We will assume a one-tailed, α=0.05 level of significance for comparisons. Process outcomes will be analysed using mixed methods, including frequencies for the rating items and thematic analysis for open-ended item responses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received Hines Veterans Affairs Institutional Review Board approval (#1673654). Findings will be disseminated widely through healthcare organisations, peer-reviewed publications and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05295108.
Subject(s)
Loneliness , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Adult , Social Isolation , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Social Support , Independent Living , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
Objective: To examine the association between anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, and life satisfaction 1 year after SCI. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the SCIRehab Project. A linear regression model estimated the association between anxiety symptoms and life satisfaction and tested the moderating effect of depression symptoms on the association between anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms with an interaction term. Setting: Six rehabilitation facilities across the United States. Participants: A total to 940 persons older than 12 years who received inpatient spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation between 2007 and 2009 were followed up 1 year post injury (n=940). Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Life satisfaction 1 year after SCI measured via the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Results: Unadjusted analyses showed anxiety symptoms were associated with decreased life satisfaction for individuals with SCI. In adjusted analyses, anxiety symptoms were not associated with life satisfaction. In adding an interaction term, anxiety symptoms were associated with 2 points lower life satisfaction holding the other variables constant (P=.02). There was a moderating effect of depression symptoms on the association between anxiety symptoms and life satisfaction. Persons with anxiety symptoms had lower life satisfaction scores at lower levels of depression symptoms but higher life satisfaction scores at higher levels of depression symptoms than persons with no anxiety. Conclusions: In clinical settings, both anxiety and depression symptoms should be monitored, measured, and treated together to optimally improve life satisfaction for persons with SCI. Prioritizing interventions known to have transdiagnostic effects may achieve the best results.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Determine anxiety trajectories and predictors up to 10 years posttraumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal, observational study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: 2836 participants with moderate to severe TBI enrolled in the TBI Model Systems National Database who had ≥2 anxiety data collection points (N=2836). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at 1, 2, 5, and 10-year follow-ups. RESULTS: Linear mixed models showed higher GAD-7 scores were associated with Black race (P<.001), public insurance (P<.001), pre-injury mental health treatment (P<.001), 2 additional TBIs with loss of consciousness (P=.003), violent injury (P=.047), and more years post-TBI (P=.023). An interaction between follow-up year and age was also related to GAD-7 scores (P=.006). A latent class mixed model identified 3 anxiety trajectories: low-stable (n=2195), high-increasing (n=289), and high-decreasing (n=352). The high-increasing and high-decreasing groups had mild or higher GAD-7 scores up to 10 years. Compared to the low-stable group, the high-decreasing group was more likely to be Black (OR=2.25), have public insurance (OR=2.13), have had pre-injury mental health treatment (OR=1.77), and have had 2 prior TBIs (OR=3.16). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial minority of participants had anxiety symptoms that either increased (10%) or decreased (13%) over 10 years but never decreased below mild anxiety. Risk factors of anxiety included indicators of socioeconomic disadvantage (public insurance) and racial inequities (Black race) as well as having had pre-injury mental health treatment and 2 prior TBIs. Awareness of these risk factors may lead to identifying and proactively referring susceptible individuals to mental health services.
Subject(s)
Anxiety , Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Humans , Prospective Studies , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/rehabilitation , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Rehabilitation CentersABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the treatment of sleep apnea may improve stroke recovery but is limited by poor adherence. We evaluated baseline features and psychosocial factors associated with CPAP adherence among stroke patients enrolled in a pilot study of an intensive CPAP adherence protocol initiated during inpatient rehabilitation. PATIENTS/METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study, we compared participants adherent to CPAP (≥4 h for ≥70% of nights over 3 months) to non-adherent participants. Using mixed methods, we quantitatively compared baseline demographic and stroke-related factors associated with adherence and qualitatively compared facilitators and barriers to adherence. RESULTS: There were 32 adherent and 20 non-adherent participants. Quantitative analysis revealed more severe stroke, aphasia and white race were associated with adherence. Adherent compared to non-adherent participants also had fewer early CPAP complaints, especially claustrophobia. In a thematic qualitative analysis, facilitators of adherence included improvement in sleep and stroke symptoms, confidence in CPAP use, and positive treatment expectations. Conversely, barriers to adherence included both potentially modifiable factors (lack of confidence in CPAP use, discomfort with a new health technology, and common CPAP-related complaints), and less modifiable factors (social stressors, sleep disturbance, and lack of home social support). DISCUSSION: Adherence programs for CPAP use after stroke should address modifiable barriers, with early desensitization to improve CPAP-related complaints and claustrophobia, and training to address perceived self-efficacy with CPAP. Future studies should explore individual goals and barriers associated with CPAP use among stroke survivors to improve long-term CPAP adherence. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02809430.