Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Front Immunol ; 12: 655958, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33968057

ABSTRACT

Programmed cell death ligand 1(PDL-1) is known for its inhibitory effect on the cellular immune response. Even though it is expressed on the surface of mast cells, its role in allergic diseases is unknown. We analyzed the effects of PD-L1 blockade in a murine model of active cutaneous anaphylaxis (ACA). C57BL/6 mice were sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). Blood samples were collected to measure specific immunoglobulins. The mice were divided into six groups that underwent the active cutaneous anaphylaxis procedure. Group 1 (negative control) received 50 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) subcutaneously, and the other five groups were sensitized with 50 µg of OVA subcutaneously. Group 2 was the positive control, and the others received the anti-PD-L1 antibody or its isotype during sensitization (groups 3 and 4) or during the challenge (groups 5 and 6). All animals that underwent ACA on the ears with OVA and PBS were sacrificed, and the reaction was evaluated by extravasation of Evans blue (measured by spectrophotometry) and histological analysis of the collected fragments. Anti-PD-L1 blockade during the sensitization phase led to a reduction in specific IgE and IgG1 levels, allergic reaction intensity at the ACA site, and mast cell degranulation in the tissue. There was no significant biological effect of anti-PD-L1 administration on the challenge phase. PD-L1 blockade during allergen sensitization inhibited the synthesis of specific IgE and IgG1 and decreased mast cell activation in this murine model of anaphylaxis.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Antibody Formation/immunology , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , Mast Cells/immunology , Skin Diseases/etiology , Animals , Antibody Specificity/immunology , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Disease Models, Animal , Immunization , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunophenotyping , Mast Cells/metabolism , Mice
2.
Arq. Asma, Alerg. Imunol ; 2(4): 467-471, out.dez.2018. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1381054

ABSTRACT

Relato de caso ilustrando como a tomografia computadorizada por emissão de pósitrons (PET-CT) pode ser um biomarcador dos casos agressivos de mastocitose.


Case report showing that positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) may be a biomarker of aggressive mastocytosis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mastocytosis, Systemic , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Biomarkers , Research Report
3.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 38(3): 497-504, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30007466

ABSTRACT

Mast cell activation disorders (MCADs) consist of episodic systemic symptoms due to mast cell mediator release. Diagnosis is based on clinical presentation and determination of high levels of tryptase or histamine. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) and postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) frequently coexist. It has been described that individuals with these syndromes can even present symptoms compatible to MCADs, which could represent a new specific phenotype. Preliminary genetic data suggest a role for tryptase in the pathogenesis of MCADs, EDS, and POTS association. Studies with larger samples evaluating clinics, genetics, and histopathology are required to define the real correlation between these 3 clinical entities.


Subject(s)
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome/epidemiology , Mast Cells/immunology , Mastocytosis/epidemiology , Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome/epidemiology , Cytokines/metabolism , Histamine/metabolism , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome/genetics , Primary Dysautonomias , Tryptases/blood , Tryptases/genetics
4.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol ; 54(3): 375-385, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27277133

ABSTRACT

Due to the increase in utilization of chemotherapies and antibodies, drug hypersensitivity reactions have increased dramatically worldwide, preventing the use of first-line therapies and impacting patients' survival and quality of life. Some of the more frequently used medications in cancer include taxanes for ovarian, lung, breast, and prostate cancers. Monoclonal antibodies are used in the treatment of neoplastic, autoimmune, and inflammatory diseases, and their clinical applications are becoming broader. Monoclonal antibody targets include CD20, HER-2, EGFR, IL-6 receptor, TNF-α, CD30, VEGF-A, IgE, and more, and examples of immune-mediated and inflammatory diseases that respond to monoclonal antibodies include rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, Wegener's granulomatosis, microscopic polyangiitis, ankylosing spondylitis, plaque psoriasis, and asthma. Neoplastic diseases include non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and colorectal, breast, gastric, and lung cancer. The clinical presentation of drug hypersensitivity reactions ranges from mild cutaneous reactions to life-threatening symptoms including anaphylaxis. Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) has become a groundbreaking approach to the management of immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions IgE and non-IgE mediated. It is the only effective procedure that enables sensitized patients to receive the full treatment dose safely, thus representing an important advance in the patients' treatment and prognosis. The aim of this review is to provide an update on hypersensitivity reactions to commonly used monoclonal and taxanes, their clinical presentations, diagnosis, and the use of RDD for their management.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Inflammation/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Autoimmune Diseases/therapy , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Humans , Inflammation/therapy , Taxoids/therapeutic use
5.
J Asthma Allergy ; 10: 293-301, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29158683

ABSTRACT

Clinical studies in asthma are not able to clear up all aspects of disease pathophysiology. Animal models have been developed to better understand these mechanisms and to evaluate both safety and efficacy of therapies before starting clinical trials. Several species of animals have been used in experimental models of asthma, such as Drosophila, rats, guinea pigs, cats, dogs, pigs, primates and equines. However, the most common species studied in the last two decades is mice, particularly BALB/c. Animal models of asthma try to mimic the pathophysiology of human disease. They classically include two phases: sensitization and challenge. Sensitization is traditionally performed by intraperitoneal and subcutaneous routes, but intranasal instillation of allergens has been increasingly used because human asthma is induced by inhalation of allergens. Challenges with allergens are performed through aerosol, intranasal or intratracheal instillation. However, few studies have compared different routes of sensitization and challenge. The causative allergen is another important issue in developing a good animal model. Despite being more traditional and leading to intense inflammation, ovalbumin has been replaced by aeroallergens, such as house dust mites, to use the allergens that cause human disease. Finally, researchers should define outcomes to be evaluated, such as serum-specific antibodies, airway hyperresponsiveness, inflammation and remodeling. The present review analyzes the animal models of asthma, assessing differences between species, allergens and routes of allergen administration.

6.
Curr Pharm Des ; 22(45): 6870-6880, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27784245

ABSTRACT

Chemotherapies drugs and monoclonal antibodies are key components of the treatment of cancer patients and patients with chronic inflammatory conditions to provide increase in life expectancy and quality of life. Their increased use has lead to an increase in drugs hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) worldwide. DHR to those agents prevented their use and promoted the use of second line therapies to protect patients' hypersensitive reactions and anaphylaxis. Second line medications may not fully address the patients' medical condition and it is desirable to keep patients on first line therapy. Drug hypersensitivity symptoms can range from mild cutaneous reactions to life-threatening anaphylaxis. Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) is a novel approach to the management of drug hypersensitivity reactions which are IgE and non-IgE mediated. Through the diferent desensitization protocols patients can receive the full dose of the medications that they have presented a hypersensitive reaction and been protected against anaphylaxis. This review looks at the current literature on hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to chemotherapy drugs and monoclonal antibodies and the potential use of RDD for their management.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/immunology , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Desensitization, Immunologic , Drug Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...