On the role of arbitration of discordant double readings of screening mammography: experience from two Italian programmes.

PURPOSE: The authors sought to assess the role of arbitration by a third reader of discordant double readings to reduce the rate of recalls to diagnostic assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 7,660 double readings of screening examinations were considered. Discordant recalls were arbitrated by an expert reader (negative/positive). Diagnostic assessment was performed irrespective of arbitration results, and its outcome was used as reference standard for the study purpose. Assuming that negative arbitration would deny recall, its impact was assessed in terms of reduced recall rate and reduced cancer detection rate. Cost analysis of introducing arbitration was performed according to these results. RESULTS: Recalls at double reading were 528 (6.8%), of which 230 (43.5%) were concordant and 298 (56.5%) were discordant. The latter underwent arbitration, which was negative in 216 (72.4%) and positive in 82 (27.6%) cases, respectively. Overall, 49 cancers were detected (6.39 ‰ screened, 9.2% recalled): 43 cancers were detected among concordant (5.6 ‰ screened, 18.6% concordant) and six among discordant recalls (0.7 ‰ screened, 2.0% discordant). Six cancers were observed among arbitrated cases: five (6%) in positive and one (4.6 ‰) in negative arbitrations. Negative arbitration would have spared 216 assessment procedures (2.8% absolute, 40.9% relative reduction of recall rate) while missing one cancer case (0.13 ‰ absolute, 2.0% relative reduction of cancer detection rate). Arbitration cost was 74 euro, whereas 216 spared assessment procedures would have cost 14,558.4-23,346 euro. CONCLUSIONS: Arbitration is a cost-effective procedure that could be employed as a first measure to counterbalance excess recall rate observed in a double-reading scenario.

Paroxysmal episodic central thermoregulatory failure.

A 51-year-old man presenting with paroxysmal attacks of unilateral sweating for 1 year was studied. Clinical and laboratory findings made the diagnosis of Shapiro or Harlequin syndrome unlikely. The onset of the sweating "crisis" was immediately followed by a progressive decrease in rectal and skin temperature, lasting for about 2 hours. This indicated that hypothermia was related to an abnormal downward shift of the thermoregulatory set point and a delayed effect of mechanisms blocking heat dissipation.

The cardiovascular effects of metoclopramide in multiple system atrophy and pure autonomic failure.

Metoclopramide (MCP), a central and peripheral dopaminergic blocker with cholinergic activity, has been proposed to treat orthostatic hypotension (OH) on the basis that it could antagonize the vasodilator and natriuretic effects of dopamine. The authors evaluated cardiovascular responses to MCP in 11 subjects with OH: 6 with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and 5 with pure autonomic failure (PAF), along with 6 healthy control subjects. Supine blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and breathing were continuously monitored before, during, and after MCP infusion. The pre-MCP head-up tilt test was tolerated at 65 degrees for 10 minutes in all subjects except in one with PAF, who tolerated 30 degrees for only 5 minutes. Tilting confirmed the OH in patients with MSA (change in mean arterial pressure [deltaMAP] = -31 +/- 13 mm Hg) and PAF (AMAP = -34 +/- 8 mm Hg). Infusion of MCP was given in four 5-mg doses every 5 minutes, with the subject in a supine position. Infusion of MCP induced the following effects: (1) A transient hypotensive effect occurred after each infusion in both patients and control subjects, the fall in MAP being counteracted by an increase in HR in control subjects but not in patients; this acute MAP fall was mo resevere in patients. (2) A progressive reduction of MAP occurred during the test,which never returned to preinfusion levels in patients; this effect was so pronounced in two PAF patients as to prevent them from receiving the last dose. Post-MCP tilting was tolerated in control subjects but in only in 5 MSA patients and 4 PAF patients. In those patients who tolerated the test, the MAP fall was similar to, or worse than, that before MCP (MSA: deltaMAP = -28 +/- 16 mm Hg; PAF: deltaMAP = -38 +/- 16 mm Hg). The cardiovascular effect of MCP in normal subjects was a transient hypotension counterbalanced by reflex tachycardia. The lack of an HR increase and the progressive fall in supine BP in MSA and PAF patients, together with worsening orthostatic tolerance after MCP infusion, are effects that should strongly discourage the use of this drug in the treatment of OH.