Self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes: Group-based versus individual education. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trails.

AIM: Patient education is an essential component of the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The present meta-analysis was aimed at verifying the efficacy of group-based versus individual education for self-management in patients with T2DM. DATA SYNTHESIS: A Medline and Embase search up to January 1st, 2021, was performed, including Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) with duration>6 months, enrolling patients with T2DM and comparing individual-based with group-based educational programs. The primary outcome was endpoint HbA1c; secondary endpoints were lipid profile, body weight, blood pressure, patients' adherence/knowledge, and quality of life. The weighed difference in means (WMD) and Mantel-Haenzel Odds Ratio (MH-OR), with 95% Confidence Interval (CI), were calculated. We retrieved 14 RCT. No significant between-group difference in HbA1c (WMD -0.39[-0.89; 0.09] mmol/mol, p = 0.11) was observed. At metaregression analyses, longer trial duration, higher baseline mean age and duration of diabetes, and lower baseline HbA1c were correlated with greater efficacy of group-based programs in reducing HbA1c. When analyzed separately, trials excluding insulin-treated patients showed a significant reduction of HbA1c in favor of group education. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T2DM, group education has similar efficacy as individual education on glucose control. Group programs are associated with an improved quality of life and patients' knowledge. PROSPERO AND OSF REGISTRATION: ID243149.

Comparison between different types of exercise training in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and network metanalysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIM: Aim of the present meta-analysis and network metanalysis (NMA) is the assessment of the effects of physical exercise on glucose control and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes. DATA SYNTHESIS: This metanalysis includes all available trials exploring the effects of different exercise modalities in type 2 diabetes, with a duration of ≥3 months. The standardized difference in means (SDM) with 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated. Data were analyzed using MetaXL and Rev Man 5.0. Primary endpoint was the effect of exercise versus no exercise on HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at endpoint. Secondary endpoints were body weight and fat, waist circumference, and blood pressure. A comparison of different exercise training modalities (aerobic, resistance and combined) for the same endpoints was also performed, choosing 'no exercise' as the reference for indirect comparisons. We included 25 trials fulfilling all inclusion criteria. Physical exercise versus no exercise produced a small, but significant, improvement of HbA1c, body fat, and systolic blood pressure at endpoint (-0.3 [-0.1;-0.4]%, -1.44 [-2.22, -0.66]%, and -5.6 [-9.5, -1.6] mmHg, respectively). Combined, supervised aerobic and resistance exercise were associated with a significantly greater reduction of HbA1c (SDM, -0.4 [-0.6;-0.3], -0.2 [-0.4;-0.1], and -0.2 [-0.3;-0.1]%, respectively), but not of FPG, in comparison with no exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Physical exercise produces small, but detectable, advantages on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors and should be suggested in type 2 diabetes. Combined aerobic/resistance training seems to be superior to aerobic training alone, but differences are small and the reliability of supporting evidence limited.