Traumatic Life Events, Violence, and Obesity: A Cross-Sectional Study from 408 Patients Enrolled in a Bariatric Surgery Program.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a chronic disease that increases cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity and mortality, decreases quality of life, and increases health care costs. While the role of lifestyle behavioral factors in the development of obesity is well established, the role of traumatic life events, including violence, is unclear. The purpose of this study was to describe situations of traumatic life events reported by patients undergoing a bariatric surgery program, with a particular focus on sexual violence and its clinical correlates. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, patients with grade II or III obesity, admitted to our digestive surgery department for bariatric surgery from August 01, 2019, to December 31, 2020, underwent a structured interview by a trained psychologist to describe the history of traumatic life events self-reported by the patients. The primary endpoint was the presence of a history of sexual violence (SV). Multivariate logistic regressions were applied to identify independent risk factors for SV. RESULTS: Of the 408 patients interviewed, 87.1% reported at least one traumatic life event and 33.1% reported having had an SV in the past. Female gender (aOR = 7.44, 95% confidence interval: 3.85-15.73; p < 0.001) and higher body mass index (1.05, 1.02-1.08; p = 0.002) were associated with an increased risk of SV. Male gender was associated with a higher risk of difficulties including sports cessation, depression, and work-related distress. CONCLUSION: In the context of obesity, psychosocial trauma is characterized by a high frequency and several gender specificities that must be taken into account in the management of these patients.

Semaglutide as a potential treatment for obesity in Smith-Kingsmore syndrome (SKS) patients: A mosaic mutation case report.

We present for the first-time efficacy and tolerability of GLP-1-RA (Semaglutide) in Smith-Kingsmore syndrome (SKS). SKS is a rare genetic disorder characterized by intellectual disability, macrocephaly, seizures and distinctive facial features due to MTOR gene mutation. We present a 22-year-old woman with mosaic SKS and severe obesity (Body Mass Index ≥40 kg/m²), treated with semaglutide. She achieved a 9 kg (7.44%) weight loss over 12 months without adverse effects.This case highlights semaglutide's potential in managing obesity in SKS patients, emphasizing the need for further research in this rare genetic disorder.

Semaglutide 2.4 mg/wk for weight loss in patients with severe obesity and with or without a history of bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the effectiveness of semaglutide 2.4 mg in patients with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 ) who had previously undergone bariatric surgery (BS) but failed to achieve satisfactory weight loss or experienced weight regain compared with patients without a history of BS with similar BMI. METHODS: The authors analyzed data from 129 patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 , including 39 with (BS+) and 90 without (BS-) a history of BS. The patients received semaglutide treatment for 24 weeks starting at 0.25 mg/wk and gradually increasing to reach a final dose of 2.4 mg/wk. The treatment outcomes were assessed based on the percentage of weight loss, changes in BMI, and waist circumference. RESULTS: Semaglutide treatment resulted in significant 9.1% weight loss in the BS+ group, with no significant difference in weight loss between the BS+ and BS- groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first, to the authors' knowledge, to compare the effectiveness of semaglutide treatment in patients with versus those without a history of BS, providing valuable evidence of its efficacy. By focusing on individuals with severe obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2 and associated comorbidities), it fills a gap in the current literature and highlights the potential of semaglutide 2.4 mg as a treatment option for this specific population.

Global healthcare pathway of people living with diabetes prior to wounding is associated with a decreased risk of amputation.

AIMS: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) has a poor prognosis and high amputation rate. We previously used the French National Health Data System (Système National des Données de Santé: SNDS) to analyze the impact of deprivation and healthcare access on DFU prognosis. The purpose of this ancillary study was to explore the relationship between the global care pathway (care consumption) the year before and after DFU and the risk of amputation. METHODS: We conducted a study based on a cohort from the SNDS. The data came from a region of France and subjects living with a complication of DFU. We looked at care consumption one year before and one year after wound onset. Risk of amputation was calculated one year after DFU onset. RESULTS: Data were extracted for 6,642 patients. Subjects with DFU had a better prognosis regarding amputation risk when they are taking cardiovascular, antibiotic, neurological, drugs. A consultation with an ophthalmologist was also linked to a better prognosis: HR = 0.71 IC95 (0.499-0.995) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: People with the best diabetes follow-up, even with several comorbidities, appear to have a better prognosis for their DFU. This highlights the importance of global healthcare and the care pathway in this chronic disease.

Renal function is highly associated with podiatric risk in diabetic patients.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is correlated with the incidence of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Furthermore, the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has proposed a classification of the risk factors for DFU. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the IWGDF risk classification and the glomerular filtration rate level estimated by the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration formula (eGFR). Methods: We conducted a prospective multicentric study. Patients were recruited from either diabetology or nephrology departments. The secondary objectives were to determine this relationship after excluding people on dialysis and to identify the factors associated with podiatric risk. Results: Four hundred and eighty-six patients were included, with a mean age of 64.2 years (±15.7) and a mean diabetes duration of 15.7 years (±12.1). Based on the IWGDF classification, 53.5% of the population were in podiatric stage 0, 11.7% in stage 1 and 34.8% in stage 2 or 3. The mean eGFR level was significantly lower in patients with podiatric risk ≥2 (36.8 ± 33.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 71.9 ± 35.3 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < .0001) and a significant association was found between the eGFR and the podiatric risk. This association remained significant after the exclusion of the hemodialysis patients. After receiver operating characteristic analysis, a cutoff of 45 ± 11 mL/min/1.73 m2 (area under the curve 0.76) was found discriminant to define a group of CKD patients at higher risk for podiatric stage ≥2. Conclusion: eGFR levels are linked to podiatric stages in diabetes mellitus. Patients with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and dialysis patients should be carefully managed in collaboration with diabetic foot specialized centers.

Social Deprivation, Healthcare Access and Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Narrative Review.

The diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common and serious complication of diabetes. There is also a strong relationship between the environment of the person living with a DFU and the prognosis of the wound. Financial insecurity seems to have a major impact, but this effect can be moderated by social protection systems. Socioeconomic and socio-educational deprivations seem to have a more complex relationship with DFU risk and prognosis. The area of residence is a common scale of analysis for DFU as it highlights the effect of access to care. Yet it is important to understand other levels of analysis because some may lead to over-interpretation of the dynamics between social deprivation and DFU. Social deprivation and DFU are both complex and multifactorial notions. Thus, the strength and characteristics of the correlation between the risk and prognosis of DFU and social deprivation greatly depend not only on the way social deprivation is calculated, but also on the way questions about the social deprivation-DFU relationship are framed. This review examines this complex relationship between DFU and social deprivation at the individual level by considering the social context in which the person lives and his or her access to healthcare.

Narrative Review of the Relationship Between CKD and Diabetic Foot Ulcer.

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are 2 significant complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). Up to 40% of patients with DM are expected to also develop CKD, and 19% to 34% will suffer from DFU during their lifetimes. However, data on the link between podiatric risk and the extent of CKD are scarce. Neuropathy, a key element of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) classification, nevertheless appears to be related to the CKD stage. The incidence of DFU and its poor evolution also appear to be linked to the stage of CKD, with mortality reaching its peak in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Whatever, the decrease in the rate of diabetic foot amputation observed worldwide, especially for major amputations, is also observed in patients with ESRD. Specific actions taken for patients undergoing dialysis seems to improve the DFU prognosis. CKD and DFU share a number of elements of pathophysiology, the first of which is peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Uremic neuropathy and nutritional status also seem to create a link between the development of the 2 complications. This literature review provides an update on the complex and dynamic relationship between DFU and CKD. It examines the epidemiologic link between CKD and diabetic foot risk, CKD and DFU occurrence, and CKD and DFU prognosis. It focuses on the pathophysiological links between these 2 complications. Finally, it highlights the actions taken to improve management in the ESRD population that have reduced the rate of major amputations in this population by more than half.

Effects of social deprivation and healthcare access on major amputation following a diabetic foot ulcer in a French administrative area: Analysis using the French claim data.

AIM: The link between social deprivation and the development of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is still widely debated. The study objective was to evaluate the relationship between lower limb amputation, social deprivation level, and inequalities in access to care service among people with DFU. This regional pilot study was conducted at the living area level and based on the French National Health Data System (SNDS). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using hospital and primary care claim data in the Languedoc-Roussillon region. DFUs were determined using an original algorithm of care consumption or hospital diagnosis. The primary end point was amputation at 1 year. Secondary end points were mortality at 1 year and impact of potential access to care on amputation. RESULTS: We included 15,507 people from 2015 to 2017. Amputation and mortality rates were 17.5 and 117 per 1000 person-years. The least precarious living areas showed better prognoses (relative risk = 0.46; 95% CI 0.27-0.66). Territorial accessibility to a private-practice nurse, unlike physician accessibility, was associated with better results on major outcomes (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This is the first study using SNDS to study the care pathway of DFU management within and outside the hospital. High social deprivation in a living areas seems to be associated with more major amputations after a DFU.

Covid-19 lockdown showed a likely beneficial effect on diabetic foot ulcers.

AIMS: During the Covid-19 epidemic, many countries imposed population lockdown. This study aimed to analyse diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) evolution of outpatients between the lockdown period and 1 month after its end. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational, single-centre study without modification of care. All patients who followed up for a DFU in the study centre between 15 April 2020 and 11 May 2020 were included. The baseline assessment occurred 4 weeks after the beginning of lockdown and the follow-up visit 4-6 weeks after easing of lockdown. The primary analysis was based on the Site, Ischaemia, Neuropathy, Bacterial infection, Area, Depth (SINBAD) classification. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included, median 69.4 years, and 25 were followed-up at easing of lockdown. The median SINBAD score was 2 (interquartile range 1; 3) at inclusion and 1 (1; 2) at easing of lockdown, with a mean change of -0.32 (95% confidence interval -0.93; 0.29). Seventy-two percent of the population had a stable or improved score between the two visits. The proportion of patients using off-loading footwear was higher among those whose SINBAD score improved compared to those whose score worsened or remained stable (72%, 44% and 28%, respectively). Diabetes type was linked to DFU prognosis. Five patients (20%) were hospitalized during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Lockdown appears to have had a positive effect on DFU if patients remain under the care of their expert wound centre. We believe this effect is related to better compliance with offloading. The wide use of tele-medicine seems relevant for the follow-up of DFU.

Predictors of hospital discharge and mortality in patients with diabetes and COVID-19: updated results from the nationwide CORONADO study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This is an update of the results from the previous report of the CORONADO (Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and Diabetes Outcomes) study, which aims to describe the outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with diabetes hospitalised for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: The CORONADO initiative is a French nationwide multicentre study of patients with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19 with a 28-day follow-up. The patients were screened after hospital admission from 10 March to 10 April 2020. We mainly focused on hospital discharge and death within 28 days. RESULTS: We included 2796 participants: 63.7% men, mean age 69.7 ± 13.2 years, median BMI (25th-75th percentile) 28.4 (25.0-32.4) kg/m2. Microvascular and macrovascular diabetic complications were found in 44.2% and 38.6% of participants, respectively. Within 28 days, 1404 (50.2%; 95% CI 48.3%, 52.1%) were discharged from hospital with a median duration of hospital stay of 9 (5-14) days, while 577 participants died (20.6%; 95% CI 19.2%, 22.2%). In multivariable models, younger age, routine metformin therapy and longer symptom duration on admission were positively associated with discharge. History of microvascular complications, anticoagulant routine therapy, dyspnoea on admission, and higher aspartate aminotransferase, white cell count and C-reactive protein levels were associated with a reduced chance of discharge. Factors associated with death within 28 days mirrored those associated with discharge, and also included routine treatment by insulin and statin as deleterious factors. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In patients with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19, we established prognostic factors for hospital discharge and death that could help clinicians in this pandemic period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04324736.