Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-life Data on Liver Disease, Treatment and Prognosis.

Background and Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) have common features and differences. This real-life study investigated their characteristics, treatment modalities, and prognoses. Methods: This retrospective comparative study was performed in 1,075 patients seen at one tertiary center between January 2008 and December 2020. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Subclassification of iCCAs after histological and radiological review, and molecular profiling was performed. Results: HCCs patients were more likely to have early-stage disease than iCCA patients. iCCA patients were more likely to be female, especially those patients without cirrhosis (43% vs. 17%). Cirrhosis was prominent among HCC patients (89% vs. 34%), but no difference in underlying liver disease among cirrhotic patients was found. OS of HCC patients was 18.4 (95% CI: 6.4, 48.3) months, that of iCCA patients was 7.0 (95% CI: 3.4, 20.1) months. OS of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer C HCC patients was 7.8 (95% CI: 4.3, 14.2) months, that of advanced/metastatic iCCA patients was 8.5 (95% CI: 5.7, 12.3) months. In patients treated with sorafenib, OS was longer in HCC patients who received subsequent tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. No significant OS difference was found between iCCA patients with and without cirrhosis or according to histological subtype. A targetable molecular alteration was detected in 50% of the iCCA patients. Conclusions: In this French series, cirrhosis was common in iCCA, which showed etiological factors comparable to those of HCC, implying a distinct oncogenic pathway. Both entities had a dismal prognosis at advanced stages. However, systemic therapies sequencing in HCC and molecular profiling in iCCA offer new insights.

Risk factors associated with preterm birth in singletons born after IVF: a national cohort study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the risk factors for prematurity other than intrauterine growth restriction in singletons after IVF? DESIGN: Data were collected from a national registry, based on an observational prospective cohort of 30,737 live births after assisted reproductive technology (fresh embryo transfers: n = 20,932 and frozen embryo transfer [FET] n = 9805) between 2014 and 2015. A population of not-small for gestational age singletons conceived after fresh embryo transfers and FET, and their parents, was selected. Data on a number of variables were collected, including type of infertility, number of oocytes retrieved and vanishing twins. RESULTS: Preterm birth occurred in 7.7% (n = 1607) of fresh embryo transfers and 6.2% (n = 611) of frozen-thawed embryo transfers (P < 0.0001; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.34 [1.21-1.49]). Endometriosis and vanishing twin increased the risk of preterm birth after fresh embryo transfer (P < 0.001; aOR 1.32 and 1.78, respectively). Polycystic ovaries or more than 20 oocytes retrieved also increased preterm birth risk (aOR 1.31 and 1.30; P = 0.003 and P = 0.02, respectively); large oocyte cohort (>20) was no longer associated with the risk of prematurity in FET. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis remains a risk for prematurity even in the absence of intrauterine growth retardation, which suggests a dysimmune effect. Large oocyte cohorts obtained by stimulation, without clinical polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosed before attempts, do not affect FET outcomes, reinforcing the idea of a phenotypic difference in the clinical presentation of polycystic ovary syndrome.